Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the Intel Arc B570 occupies a specific tier in the Greedfall performance hierarchy. The data places this combination at rank 2344 out of 2938 tested combos, situating it in the lower half of the database. This ranking reflects a pairing that can run the game, but it does so with measurable compromises at higher settings and resolutions. The following analysis breaks down the measured results, focusing on where the combo excels and where its limitations become apparent.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame of 2344 out of 2938 combos is a decisive data point. This positions the Ryzen 5 7400F + Arc B570 in the 21st percentile of tested systems for Greedfall, meaning roughly 79% of tested combinations deliver higher average frame rates. This is not a top-tier configuration for this title; it is a mid-to-low-tier setup that requires careful settings management to achieve smooth gameplay.

The ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU’s overall benchmark standing. The Intel Arc B570 has a percentileVsAllGpus of 65, which is moderate, but its performance in Greedfall specifically is dragged down by demanding presets. The CPU, meanwhile, has a percentileVsAllCpus of 83, showing strong synthetic processing power. The disparity between the CPU’s high percentile and the combo’s low in-game rank suggests the Arc B570 is the limiting factor in most scenarios, unable to fully translate the CPU’s capability into frame rate.

When compared to other components, the data shows the Ryzen 5 7400F is closely matched with its nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score of 32750 is within 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662). This indicates the CPU is not the source of the combo’s low ranking; it is performing as expected for its class. The bottleneck lies elsewhere, specifically in the GPU’s ability to handle Greedfall’s graphical load at higher settings.

The practical takeaway from the ranking is that this combo is best suited for 1080p gameplay at medium-to-high settings. Pushing to 1440p or 4K with higher presets will result in frame rates that fall below the threshold for comfortable action RPG play. The rank serves as a warning that expectations must be moderated; this is not a system for maxing out Greedfall at high resolutions.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the dominant component in determining this combo’s Greedfall performance. Its memory configuration includes 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. For a 2019 action RPG, this memory capacity is sufficient for texture loading at 1080p and 1440p, but the bus width and bandwidth become limiting factors at 4K where the data shows significant frame rate drops.

The GPU’s clock speeds are fixed at a base and boost of 2500 MHz. This constant clock rate, combined with 2304 shading units and 80 ROPs, provides a baseline compute capacity of 11.52 TFLOPS FP32. These specifications are moderate for the current market, and the benchmark results reflect that. In Greedfall, the GPU’s rasterization performance is the primary constraint; the data shows that moving from Low to Ultra settings at any resolution incurs a substantial FPS penalty, which is directly attributable to the GPU’s fill rate and shading power.

The Arc B570’s nearest rival by average benchmark score is the Intel Arc A750, with a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the B570 is essentially tied with its predecessor. This is a critical data point: the B570 does not offer a generational leap in raw performance over the A750. For Greedfall, this means users should expect similar results to the older card, regardless of the newer architecture.

The 10 GB VRAM is adequate for the game’s requirements at the tested settings, as no memory-related stutters or crashes are indicated in the measured FPS data. However, the GPU’s overall score of 20556 in the average benchmark, with a percentile of 65, confirms it is a mid-range part. The measured FPS in Greedfall aligns with this, showing that the GPU can handle Low settings at 4K (54 FPS) but falls to an unplayable 24 FPS at Ultra, demonstrating a clear performance ceiling.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Greedfall with this combo?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution. At this resolution, the combo achieves playable frame rates across all settings, with a Low preset hitting 130 FPS and High preset reaching 92 FPS.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Greedfall?

A: The data shows 4K is only viable at Low settings, where the average FPS is 54. At Medium settings, the FPS drops to 42, and at High it falls to 38. Ultra settings at 4K produce an average of 24 FPS, which is not smooth enough for an action RPG.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750 (20582). This indicates the two GPUs offer nearly identical raw performance, making the B570 more of a refresh than a significant upgrade.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this combo?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU has a high percentile rank of 83, while the combo’s in-game rank is only 2344 out of 2938. The GPU’s performance at higher settings and resolutions is what drags the combo down.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 90 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 41 FPS. This represents a drop of 49 FPS, or roughly 54% lower performance, when switching to the highest quality settings.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7400F keep up with the GPU in Greedfall?

A: Yes, the CPU’s synthetic benchmarks show it is more than capable. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 21765, which is strong for a 6-core part. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (130 FPS) suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, as the frame rate is high and not CPU-bound.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear guide for optimal settings. The primary goal is to maintain an average frame rate above 60 FPS for smooth gameplay. At 1920x1080, the High preset achieves 92 FPS, which is an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. The Medium preset offers 102 FPS, but the visual upgrade to High is worth the 10 FPS cost. The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target and not recommended.

For 2560x1440, the High preset yields 64 FPS, which is playable but not with much headroom. The Medium preset is safer, offering 71 FPS with a minimum of 60 FPS, ensuring consistent performance during combat. The Low preset at 90 FPS is smooth but sacrifices too much visual fidelity for the resolution. The Ultra preset at 41 FPS is not recommended for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the only viable option is the Low preset, which averages 54 FPS. This is playable but will have noticeable visual downgrades. The Medium preset averages 42 FPS, which is borderline, and the High and Ultra presets at 38 and 24 FPS respectively are not suitable for active gameplay. The data indicates that for the best experience, users should prioritize 1080p with High settings, as this provides the best balance of visual detail and frame rate stability without dipping below the 60 FPS threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The dataset provides specific average FPS figures for each resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low settings produce an average of 130 FPS, Medium produces 102 FPS with a minimum of 87 and a maximum of 117, High produces 92 FPS, and Ultra produces 59 FPS. This shows a clear degradation curve as settings increase, with the gap between High and Ultra being the most significant drop at 33 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings average 90 FPS, Medium averages 71 FPS with a range of 60 to 81, High averages 64 FPS, and Ultra drops to 41 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at High settings results in a drop from 92 to 64 FPS, a 28 FPS loss, indicating the GPU is becoming more stressed.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates become marginal for most presets. Low settings average 54 FPS, Medium averages 42 FPS, High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K is the only one with a recorded minimum (36 FPS) and maximum (48 FPS), showing significant variance. The data reveals that the arc B570 cannot maintain fluid gameplay at 4K with any preset above Low, and even Low is below the 60 FPS target.

The overall pattern shows that the GPU’s performance is heavily dependent on both resolution and settings. At 1080p, the combo is capable of high refresh rates. At 1440p, it is playable with adjustments. At 4K, it is only suitable for static scenes or less demanding games.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F provides the computational foundation for this combo. It is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which is beneficial for gaming workloads. Its synthetic performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21765 and a single-core score of 3072.

In Greedfall, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and AI, while the GPU renders the scene. The measured data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 130 FPS, which is a high frame rate that would stress the CPU’s single-thread performance. The CPU’s single-core benchmark score of 3072 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to feed the GPU at these frame rates.

The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i5-14600T, have an average score of 32707, a deltaPct of 0.1% over the 7400F. This indicates the 7400F is on par with other mid-range CPUs. The data suggests that in this combo, the CPU is waiting on the GPU to render frames, especially at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate is 24 FPS, which is far below what the CPU is capable of producing; the GPU is the sole limiting factor.

The CPU’s 65W TDP and 5nm process node are also relevant. The low power draw means less heat generation, allowing the CPU to maintain its boost clock of 4.70 GHz without thermal throttling, which is important for consistent frame times. The data confirms that the CPU is a solid partner for the Arc B570, providing ample processing power without becoming a liability.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. From 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 92 to 64, a 30% decrease. This is expected, as 1440p requires rendering more than 1.7 times the pixels of 1080p. The GPU’s fill rate becomes the limiting factor, as the shading units and ROPs are unable to maintain the same throughput.

Scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings, the FPS drops from 64 to 38, a 41% decrease. This is a steeper drop than the previous step, indicating that the GPU is hitting a memory bandwidth wall. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for the massive pixel count at 4K, causing the frame rate to plummet. At 4K Ultra, the FPS drops to 24, which is a 63% decrease from the 1440p Ultra score of 41.

The resolution scaling data points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see similar FPS across resolutions at the same settings. However, the data shows a consistent decline from 1080p to 4K, which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU’s strong benchmarks and high percentile (83) support this conclusion; it is not holding back the system.

The only exception to this scaling pattern is at Low settings, where the FPS drop from 1080p (130) to 1440p (90) is 31%, and from 1440p to 4K (54) is 40%. This shows that even at the lowest settings, where the GPU’s compute load is reduced, the memory bandwidth and ROP throughput still create a significant performance ceiling at higher resolutions. The data confirms that this combo is designed for 1080p play, with 1440p being a compromise, and 4K being largely unplayable except at minimal settings.