Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT pairing in Greedfall presents a study in generational balance. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread part from the 2000 series with Zen architecture, provides the foundational processing muscle, while the GPU, a 7nm RDNA 2.0 part, handles the visual heavy lifting. The data reveals a system that scales predictably across resolutions, but with a clear ceiling imposed by the processor at lower settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 2600’s specifications suggest a processor well-suited for a 2019 action RPG. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it offers ample parallelism for game logic and background tasks. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz are modest by modern standards, which is reflected in its benchmark scores. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1248 in multicore and 157.3 in singlecore. The single-threaded score, in particular, hints at the potential bottleneck in a game like Greedfall, which often relies on a few primary threads.

The benchmark data shows this CPU holds a 75th percentile ranking against all tested CPUs. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, which is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core i9-11900H, which is 0.5% faster. The AMD EPYC 9454 is 1.2% slower, and the Intel Xeon D-1746TER is 0.7% slower. These tight deltas indicate the Ryzen 5 2600 sits in a dense pack of mid-range performers. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 2239 is a key indicator; when coupled with the GPU's raw power, this becomes the limiting factor at lower resolutions and settings.

The CPU’s memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s and dual-channel DDR4 support are adequate for feeding the six cores. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache is another point of interest. In Greedfall, where the game world streams assets and AI routines run continuously, the cache hierarchy can influence frame pacing. The data suggests that while the CPU is not the star of this show, its role is pivotal. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 191 FPS, but this appears to be the practical ceiling for this CPU, as the GPU is not yet fully saturated at that point. The processor’s performance in PassMark's physics test (673) and integer math (44518) indicate it can handle the game's calculations, but the single-core throughput is what prevents higher frame rates beyond the 191 FPS mark.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is the clear performance driver in this configuration. Its RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 7nm process from TSMC, provides a substantial leap in efficiency and raw throughput over the CPU’s generation. The GPU’s base clock is 2150 MHz, with a boost clock of 2600 MHz and a game clock of 2495 MHz. This high-frequency design, combined with 2560 shading units, allows for impressive pixel and texture throughput. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is crucial for high-resolution textures in Greedfall.

The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its capability. A PassMark G3D score of 20700 places it in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (0.5% slower), AMD FirePro W7100 (0.6% slower), AMD FirePro D700 (0.7% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (1.1% slower). These are older or mobile parts, underscoring the 6750 XT's position as a strong desktop offering. The GPU’s compute score of 9550 and its DirectX 12 score of 80 in Passmark suggest it can handle the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API that Greedfall can leverage.

In the measured data, the GPU’s capability is evident in the scaling from Medium to High settings. At 1440p, the difference between Low (132 FPS) and High (94 FPS) is a 38 FPS drop, showcasing how the GPU’s workload increases with visual fidelity. The GPU has enough VRAM for all tested settings; the 12 GB capacity is not a limiting factor in these rows. The 64 ROPS and 160 TMUs are well-utilized in this title, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates. The GPU is the component that allows the system to push 4K at 56 FPS on High, a feat that would be impossible without its 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K clearly illustrates the shifting bottleneck between CPU and GPU. At 1080p Low, the system hits 191 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 132 FPS, a 31% reduction. At 4K Low, it falls to 79 FPS, another 40% reduction from 1440p. This steep decline at lower settings indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases. The CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at these frame rates, but the GPU's fill rate is being taxed.

However, the scaling pattern changes at higher settings. At 1080p Ultra, the system produces 87 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 60 FPS, a 31% reduction. At 4K Ultra, it falls to 36 FPS, a 40% reduction from 1440p. The relative percentage drops are similar across Low and Ultra settings, but the absolute values are much lower at Ultra. This suggests that at Ultra, the GPU is the sole limiting factor at all resolutions. The CPU has enough headroom to handle the game logic, but the GPU's workload increases linearly with resolution.

The data implies that at 1080p with Low or Medium settings, the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU is not fully saturated. The 191 FPS at 1080p Low is likely near the CPU's maximum frame output for this game. As the resolution increases, the GPU takes over as the bottleneck, and the FPS drops are more directly tied to the GPU's rendering capabilities. The 4K Medium result of 62 FPS (with a min of 53 and max of 71) shows that even at a moderate preset, the GPU is working hard. This system is best balanced at 1440p, where the CPU can still feed the GPU effectively, and the GPU has enough headroom to provide high frame rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear matrix of performance. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates. On Low settings, it averages 191 FPS. Medium settings reduce this to 150 FPS, with a minimum of 128 FPS and a maximum of 173 FPS. High settings yield 136 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 87 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 104 FPS, a 54% reduction, showing the significant cost of the Ultra preset's visual effects.

At 2560x1440, the performance is still strong but shows the expected decrease. Low settings average 132 FPS. Medium settings produce 104 FPS (min 88, max 120). High settings average 94 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 60 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 72 FPS, a 55% reduction. This resolution appears to be the sweet spot for this combo, as it offers high refresh rates on medium settings and a playable 60 FPS on Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is heavily taxed. Low settings average 79 FPS, making it playable. Medium settings drop to 62 FPS (min 53, max 71), which is still smooth. High settings average 56 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 36 FPS, which is not ideal for a fast-paced action RPG. The drop from Low to Ultra at 4K is 43 FPS, a 54% reduction. The min FPS of 53 at 4K Medium suggests occasional frame dips, but the overall experience remains fluid.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

This specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1705 out of 3703 tested combos in Greedfall. This places it in the 46th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 46% of the combinations in the database. The rank is a holistic measure that accounts for the entire performance envelope across all resolutions and settings.

The ranking is lower than one might expect given the GPU's individual percentile of 71. This discrepancy highlights the CPU's role in holding back the system. While the GPU is a top-tier performer, the CPU's 75th percentile ranking is dragged down in gaming scenarios by its single-core performance. The data suggests that pairing this GPU with a stronger CPU would yield a higher combo rank, as the GPU’s potential is not fully realized at 1080p. The combo's rank of 1705 indicates that while it is a capable system, there are many other pairings that offer better overall performance in this specific title. The GPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores are older or mobile parts, but the CPU's closest rivals include modern laptop chips, which may have better single-thread performance.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The ideal settings depend on the user's target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p users, the data points to High settings as the best balance. At 136 FPS, it provides a high-refresh-rate experience, while the jump to Ultra (87 FPS) costs 49 FPS for what is likely marginal visual improvement in a game like this. Medium settings at 150 FPS are also viable, but High offers a better visual-to-performance ratio.

For 1440p, Medium settings at 104 FPS offer the best experience for high-refresh monitors. High settings at 94 FPS are also excellent, providing a slightly better image with a minor FPS cost. Ultra at 60 FPS is perfectly playable for those who prioritize image quality over frame rate. The 1440p Medium row shows a min FPS of 88, ensuring a smooth experience. For 4K, Medium settings at 62 FPS (min 53) are the sweet spot. High at 56 FPS is acceptable, but the 4K Medium row offers a more consistent frame time. Ultra at 36 FPS should be avoided for action sequences. The data suggests that a 1080p High or 1440p Medium preset provides the most enjoyable experience, balancing visual fidelity with the high frame rates this hardware can deliver.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo achieves in Greedfall?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 191 at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Greedfall?

A: Yes, it can achieve 56 FPS at 4K High and 62 FPS at 4K Medium, but it drops to 36 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck at 1080p Low?

A: At 1080p Low (191 FPS), the CPU is likely the limiting factor, as the GPU is not fully saturated at that frame rate.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank among all tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1705 out of 3703 tested combinations, placing it in the 46th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU's single-core performance impact the frame rate?

A: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 2239 limits the maximum frame rate, especially at lower resolutions and settings, preventing higher FPS beyond the 191 FPS mark.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: Medium settings at 1440p provide 104 FPS with a minimum of 88 FPS, making it the best balance for smooth gameplay. High settings at 94 FPS are also a strong option.