Fortnite

The Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the Intel Arc B370 sits near the very bottom of the performance hierarchy for Fortnite, ranking 2517th out of 2740 tested combinations. This places the combo in the 8th percentile of all tested systems, indicating that while the setup is functional, it delivers a gaming experience that is significantly below what most other configurations achieve. The data suggests a fundamental imbalance where the integrated-class GPU severely constrains the system, preventing the capable six-core CPU from demonstrating its potential in this Battle Royale title.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2517 out of 2740 is a stark indicator of its position. With 92% of tested combinations performing better, this is not a system aimed at competitive Fortnite play. The bottleneck is immediately apparent when examining the components: the Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor with a 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs, while the CPU sits in the 71st percentile. This massive disparity means the GPU is the limiting factor in nearly every scenario. The data shows that even at the lowest settings and resolution, the combo only achieves 104 FPS, which is playable but far from the high-refresh-rate territory competitive players seek. The rank reflects a system where the GPU’s capabilities, measured by a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, are akin to legacy discrete graphics cards from over a decade ago, placing it in direct competition with parts like the ATI Radeon HD 5770.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of running Fortnite at a playable frame rate?

A: Yes, but only at the lowest settings. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 104 FPS. At Medium settings, the average drops to 73 FPS, which remains playable, but High and Ultra settings fall to 57 and 37 FPS respectively, showing a steep decline in playability as graphical demands increase.

Q: What is the primary bottleneck in this system for Fortnite?

A: The Intel Arc B370 GPU is the definitive bottleneck. Its percentile ranking of 5th among all GPUs, contrasted with the CPU’s 71st percentile, shows a severe imbalance. The GPU’s integrated nature, with system-shared memory and a 25 W TDP, limits its performance, preventing the i5-11400F from being fully utilized in most gaming scenarios.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17177, which is nearly identical to its closest competitors. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7H12, 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U, and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-12450H. This indicates the CPU’s performance is solidly mid-pack, neither a standout nor a laggard.

Q: Is this GPU comparable to any dedicated graphics cards?

A: Benchmark data shows the Intel Arc B370 is most similar to legacy discrete GPUs. Its average score of 1184 places it within 1.4% of the AMD FirePro M2000 and within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon HD 7650M. This positions its raw compute performance alongside hardware from a much older generation.

Q: Can this system handle 4K resolution in Fortnite?

A: The data indicates 4K is not viable for this combo. At 3840x2160, even Low settings only yield an average of 35 FPS, and Medium settings produce 25 FPS. Ultra settings drop to a nearly unplayable 13 FPS average. The GPU’s limited fill rate and memory bandwidth are insufficient for such a high pixel count.

Q: What is the difference in performance between 1080p and 1440p?

A: The difference is substantial. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 104 at 1080p to 66 at 1440p, a reduction of 38 FPS. This trend continues across all presets, with the High preset seeing a drop from 57 to 36 FPS. The GPU struggles to maintain performance as the resolution increases, reinforcing its role as the primary limiter.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 104 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops the average to 66 FPS, a 36.5% reduction. At 3840x2160, Low settings yield only 35 FPS, a 66.3% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline suggests the GPU is overwhelmed by the increasing pixel count, as the integrated graphics processor with system-shared memory cannot keep up with the bandwidth demands of higher resolutions. For instance, the jump from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings results in a 27 FPS drop (73 to 46), while the jump from 1440p to 4K at the same settings results in a 21 FPS drop (46 to 25). The consistency of these drops indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, as the CPU’s performance is likely sufficient to handle the game’s logic at these frame rates. The data implies that users aiming for smoother gameplay should prioritize lower resolutions, as the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s capabilities across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system is most viable. Low settings deliver an average of 104 FPS, making for a smooth experience. Medium settings reduce this to 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 and a maximum of 84 FPS, showing some frame time variance. High settings drop the average to 57 FPS, while Ultra settings fall to 37 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 67 FPS, highlighting the significant impact of graphical presets on this GPU. At 2560x1440, performance becomes more constrained. Low settings average 66 FPS, which is playable, but Medium settings drop to 46 FPS (min 39, max 53). High settings average 36 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 24 FPS. The step from Low to Ultra at 1440p is a 42 FPS difference. At 3840x2160, the system struggles. Low settings average 35 FPS, Medium settings average 25 FPS (min 21, max 28), High settings average 19 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 13 FPS. The data shows that the combo is only capable of providing a consistently smooth experience at 1080p with Low or Medium settings. The minimum FPS figures for Medium settings across resolutions (62 at 1080p, 39 at 1440p, 21 at 4K) indicate that frame drops can be significant, especially at higher resolutions, which could impact gameplay fluidity in intense combat scenarios.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the user’s target resolution and tolerance for frame rate fluctuations. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance, with an average of 73 FPS and a minimum of 62 FPS. This ensures the frame rate stays above the 60 FPS threshold, providing a smooth experience without the significant visual downgrade of the Low preset. The Low preset, at 104 FPS average, is preferable for competitive play where maximum frame rate is prioritized, but it comes at the cost of visual fidelity. The High preset, at 57 FPS average, is playable but may feel less fluid, and Ultra is not recommended due to its 37 FPS average. For 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only option that delivers a consistently smooth experience, with an average of 66 FPS. The Medium preset, at 46 FPS average, is borderline, and its minimum of 39 FPS could lead to noticeable stutters. High and Ultra presets are not viable at this resolution. At 3840x2160, no preset provides a playable experience, with even Low settings averaging only 35 FPS. The data suggests that users should either stick to 1080p with Medium settings for a quality experience or drop to Low settings at 1080p for maximum performance. The GPU’s limitations make higher resolutions impractical.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-11400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Rocket Lake architecture, built on a 14 nm process. Its base clock is 2.60 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s benchmark scores show it is a capable mid-range part, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14340 and a single-core score of 2024. Its average benchmark score of 17177 places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, indicating it performs better than the majority of processors. However, in this specific Fortnite combo, the CPU’s role is diminished due to the GPU bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 104 FPS, which suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at this level. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5619 and the 8-thread score of 4691 indicate that the CPU has sufficient multi-threaded performance for modern game engines. The L3 cache of 12 MB and dual-channel DDR4 memory support provide adequate bandwidth for gaming. The data implies that the CPU is not the limiting factor, as its performance is far above the GPU’s, and the frame rates are primarily dictated by the graphics processor. The CPU’s 71st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 5th percentile ranking makes this imbalance clear. In a system with a more powerful GPU, this CPU would likely deliver significantly higher frame rates, as it has the headroom to handle more demanding graphics workloads.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with a TDP of only 25 W. The GPU features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units, along with 10 ray tracing cores. Its memory is system-shared, with bandwidth that is system dependent, which is a significant limitation for gaming. The GPU’s raw compute performance is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS for FP32, but its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to that of the ATI Radeon HD 5770, a discrete GPU from 2009, highlighting the Arc B370’s limited gaming capability. The GPU’s performance in Fortnite directly reflects these specifications. The pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s are insufficient for higher resolutions, as evidenced by the 4K results. The system-shared memory means the GPU must compete with the CPU for bandwidth, further reducing performance. The 25 W TDP and integrated nature of the GPU mean it has no dedicated memory or power delivery, limiting its ability to sustain high clocks under load. The data shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as its performance is consistently the limiting factor across all resolutions and settings. Its 5th percentile ranking, compared to the CPU’s 71st percentile, confirms that any upgrade to the graphics subsystem would yield the most significant performance improvements in Fortnite.