Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers a remarkable performance profile in Fivem, with benchmark results indicating that the system is capable of extremely high frame rates across all tested configurations. The data shows a clear hierarchy where the CPU’s 16 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, provide ample processing power for the game’s multiplayer workloads, while the RTX 4090, with its 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 16,384 shading units, ensures that visual fidelity is never a bottleneck at lower resolutions. This pairing ranks 625th out of 3,005 tested combos, placing it in the top tier of systems evaluated for this title.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is a mobile processor built on the Panther Lake architecture using a 3 nm process node. Its configuration of 16 cores and 16 threads is notable for a mobile chip, and the benchmark data suggests that this core count is well-suited to Fivem’s demands, which often involve simulating numerous entities and player interactions simultaneously. The processor’s base clock of 2.10 GHz is modest, but the boost clock of 5.10 GHz allows for significant single-threaded headroom when needed. In Fivem, where frame pacing and responsiveness are critical, this boost capability likely helps maintain consistent performance during complex scenes. The CPU’s L3 cache of 18 MB (shared) and dual-channel LPDDR5X memory support with a bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s further contribute to its ability to feed the GPU with data without introducing stutter.

The processor’s benchmark scores reinforce its capability. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multicore score of 18,911 and a single-core score of 2,200.5, indicating strong performance in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 36,811 and single-thread score of 4,280 place it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, showing that it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. This is particularly relevant for Fivem, as the game’s server-side logic and client-side rendering can be sensitive to CPU throughput. The data shows that the Core Ultra X9 388H is not a limiting factor in this combo; instead, it provides a solid foundation for the RTX 4090 to operate at its full potential. The nearest rivals in CPU performance include the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, which scores a delta of -0.2% relative to this chip, and the Intel Core i9-13950HX, which is 0.3% behind. This suggests that the Ultra X9 388H is competitive with top-tier desktop and mobile parts, making it an excellent match for a high-end GPU like the RTX 4090.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve the highest frame rates in Fivem?

A: The data indicates that the highest average frame rate is achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where the system reaches 262 FPS. However, at 4K (3840x2160) with Low settings, it still maintains a very playable 96 FPS, showing that the combo is capable of high refresh rates even at higher resolutions.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H compare to its nearest CPU rival in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Core Ultra X9 388H has an average benchmark score of 44,466. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, scores 44,573, which is a delta of -0.2%, meaning the AMD chip is slightly faster by a negligible margin. The Intel Core i9-13950HX is 0.3% slower, with a score of 44,342.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 a significant performance upgrade over its nearest GPU rivals in this system?

A: The RTX 4090’s average benchmark score is 60,347. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60, scores 60,326, a delta of 0%, indicating virtually identical performance. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% faster, while the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% slower, showing that the 4090 sits in a close competitive cluster.

Q: What is the CPU’s position in the global performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 88% of processors tested. This places it firmly in the high-performance tier, suitable for demanding applications like Fivem.

Q: Does the combo’s rank in Fivem reflect its overall hardware strength?

A: The combo ranks 625th out of 3,005 tested combinations, which puts it in the top 20% of all systems tested for this game. This ranking is consistent with the high percentile scores of both the CPU and GPU, indicating that the hardware is well-matched for Fivem’s requirements.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-core performance impact the game’s frame rates?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,200.5 is strong, and the Passmark single-thread score of 4,280 supports this. In Fivem, which often relies on a primary thread for game logic, this high single-core performance helps ensure that frame rates remain stable, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data shows a clear trade-off between visual quality and frame rate across the four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 262 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. The Medium preset provides a substantial improvement in quality while still achieving 207 FPS, making it a balanced choice for most players. High settings at 1080p yield 165 FPS, which is still exceptionally smooth, while Ultra drops to 128 FPS, a more demanding option that may be preferred for single-player immersion. Given that the RTX 4090 is a top-tier GPU, the data suggests that the Medium preset offers the best blend of performance and visual quality at 1080p, as it maintains a frame rate well above the 144Hz threshold while leveraging more of the GPU’s capabilities.

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern continues. Low settings produce 172 FPS, Medium achieves 136 FPS, High reaches 109 FPS, and Ultra dips to 84 FPS. For 1440p gaming, Medium is again the recommended preset, as it provides a high refresh rate experience with a noticeable improvement in graphical detail over Low. At 3840x2160, the demands on the GPU become more apparent. Low settings yield 96 FPS, Medium delivers 75 FPS, High drops to 60 FPS, and Ultra falls to 47 FPS. For 4K, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, maintaining a playable frame rate above 60 FPS while offering better visuals than Low. The data indicates that the Medium preset is the most versatile choice overall, providing a consistent and smooth experience across all resolutions without pushing the system to its limits.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 achieves a rank of 625 out of 3,005 tested combos in Fivem. This places the system in the top 20.8% of all configurations tested, which is a strong showing for a mobile CPU paired with a desktop-class GPU. The ranking reflects the synergy between the processor and graphics card, where neither component significantly bottlenecks the other. The CPU’s 88th percentile performance ensures that it can keep up with the RTX 4090, which also sits in the 88th percentile of GPUs. This balanced pairing allows the system to deliver high frame rates consistently, as evidenced by the measured FPS data. While the combo is not in the top 100, it outperforms the vast majority of systems, indicating that it is well-suited for high-end gaming. The rank also suggests that while there are faster combinations, this particular setup offers a level of performance that would satisfy most users looking for a premium Fivem experience. The delta between the CPU and GPU scores is minimal, further confirming that this is a well-matched pair.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions reveals how the system scales under increasing graphical load. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 262 FPS. When moving to 2560x1440, this drops to 172 FPS, a reduction of 34.4%. At 3840x2160, the frame rate falls further to 96 FPS, which is a 63.4% decrease from the 1080p figure. This pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For example, at High settings, the frame rate drops from 165 FPS at 1080p to 109 FPS at 1440p (a 33.9% decrease) and then to 60 FPS at 4K (a 63.6% decrease from 1080p). This scaling behavior indicates that the RTX 4090 is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions. The GPU’s workload increases significantly with pixel count, and the data shows that the frame rate drops proportionally to the increase in resolution, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom, allowing the GPU to push extremely high frame rates. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes saturated, and the frame rate declines. This suggests that for users seeking maximum frame rates, playing at 1080p is optimal, while 4K gaming will still provide a smooth experience at Medium settings (75 FPS) but with less headroom for high refresh rates. The CPU’s performance remains consistent across resolutions, as its role is more about maintaining frame pacing rather than rendering pixels.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following is a detailed breakdown of the measured average frame rates for the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Fivem.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 262, making it ideal for esports-style play or very high refresh rate displays. Medium settings reduce this to 207 FPS, with a minimum of 176 FPS and a maximum of 238 FPS, showing good consistency. High settings yield 165 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 128 FPS. These numbers indicate that even at the most demanding preset, the system remains well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show the expected decline. Low settings achieve 172 FPS, Medium settings reach 136 FPS (with a minimum of 116 FPS and a maximum of 156 FPS), High settings hit 109 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 84 FPS. This resolution is a sweet spot for the combo, offering a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while still maintaining frame rates that exceed 100 FPS on High settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed harder. Low settings deliver 96 FPS, Medium settings produce 75 FPS (with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS), High settings achieve 60 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 47 FPS. The data shows that for 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it provides a frame rate above 60 FPS while offering a good balance of visual quality. The Ultra preset, while visually impressive, dips below the 60 FPS threshold, which may be noticeable in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. Overall, the measured FPS breakdown confirms that this combo is versatile, capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and playable frame rates at 4K.