Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 195 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 72 | 92 | 115 | 146 |
| 1440p QHD | 129 | 166 | 209 | 263 |
| 1080p Full HD | 197 | 252 | 314 | 390 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 36 MB shared L3 cache. This CPU is a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20795. In single-threaded tasks, it also performs strongly, scoring 2204 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2458 in Geekbench single-core. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking among all tested CPUs indicates that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.
In the context of Fivem, a multiplayer game, the CPU’s role is often more pronounced than in single-player titles. Fivem is known for its heavy server-side scripting and the need to process many player interactions, which can create significant CPU load. The data shows that this combination, the Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the RTX 5080, achieves 256 FPS at 1080p Low settings. This high frame rate suggests that the CPU can feed the GPU effectively, preventing a bottleneck even at lower resolutions where the GPU has less work to do. The transition from 1080p Low to 1080p Ultra shows a drop from 256 FPS to 126 FPS, indicating that even at 1080p, the GPU becomes a limiting factor as settings increase. However, the CPU’s strong multi-core performance, with a Passmark multithread score of 55759, ensures that the game’s simulation and scripting threads are handled without becoming the primary constraint.
The CPU’s 24 cores and 24 threads are particularly relevant for Fivem, as the game can spread its workload across many threads. The L3 cache of 36 MB shared helps with data locality, which is beneficial for the frequent data access patterns in multiplayer environments. The processor’s memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, supported by dual-channel DDR5, also plays a role in maintaining smooth performance, as the game world and player data need to be accessed quickly. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX’s nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score include the Intel Xeon w5-3525 with a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 4484PX with a delta of -0.5%. These are all high-end server and workstation processors, which underscores the 275HX’s position as a top-tier mobile chip.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with High settings for this combo?
A: The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 107 FPS. This is a solid result, indicating that the combo can drive high refresh rate monitors at this resolution with quality settings enabled.
Q: How does the CPU’s single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance?
A: The CPU scores 2204 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 35589 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The multi-core score is roughly 16 times higher than the single-core score, which is consistent with a 24-core processor. In Fivem, this means that while single-threaded tasks are handled well, the processor’s strength lies in distributing the game’s many threads across its cores.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 4K Medium settings?
A: The minimum FPS at 3840x2160 with Medium settings is 63 FPS, with an average of 74 FPS and a maximum of 85 FPS. This shows that even at 4K, the combo maintains playable frame rates, though the gap between minimum and average suggests some frame time variance.
Q: Is this CPU better than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX?
A: Based on average benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has an average score of 67868, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has an average score of 67469. The Threadripper is 0.6% faster, making the two processors extremely close in overall performance. The 275HX is also compared to the Intel Xeon 6515P, which has an average score of 67006, with the 275HX being 0.7% faster.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5080?
A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is 999 USD. This is the only pricing information available in the data.
Q: How does the CPU’s performance percentile compare to the GPU’s?
A: The CPU is in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. This suggests that the CPU is relatively stronger in its category than the GPU is in its own, which is an important consideration for balancing a system.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear trend as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 256 FPS. This drops to 169 FPS at 1440p with Low settings, a reduction of about 34%. At 4K with Low settings, the average FPS is 94, which is a 63% drop from 1080p Low. This substantial decrease indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The RTX 5080, with its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth, has the capacity to handle 4K workloads, but the sheer pixel count at 3840x2160 demands more from the GPU’s compute units.
Looking at the High settings across resolutions, the pattern is similar but with lower absolute numbers. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 162. At 1440p High, it drops to 107, a 34% reduction. At 4K High, the average FPS is 59, which is a 64% drop from 1080p High. This consistent scaling pattern suggests that the frame rate is primarily governed by the GPU’s fill rate and shader performance. The CPU, despite its strength, is not the bottleneck at these settings, as the frame rate drops proportionally with the increase in resolution.
The data implies that for players targeting high refresh rates, 1080p is the sweet spot, as even at Ultra settings, the combo delivers 126 FPS. At 1440p, the combo can still push past 60 FPS at Ultra (83 FPS), but the High settings at 107 FPS offer a better balance for high refresh rate gaming. At 4K, the combo is best suited for 60 FPS gaming at Medium settings (74 FPS average), as Ultra settings drop to 46 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider the minimum for a smooth experience. The scaling from 1080p to 4K shows that this combination of CPU and GPU is more than capable of handling the CPU demands of Fivem at any resolution, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo delivers exceptional performance. With Low settings, the average FPS is 256, which is the highest average recorded in the entire dataset. Medium settings at 1080p yield an average of 202 FPS, with a minimum of 172 and a maximum of 233 FPS. High settings produce 162 FPS on average, and Ultra settings still manage an impressive 126 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo is capable of driving the fastest refresh rate monitors available, even at the highest quality settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline from 1080p. Low settings at 1440p average 169 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings average 133 FPS, with a minimum of 113 and a maximum of 153 FPS. High settings average 107 FPS, providing a solid experience for most gamers. Ultra settings at 1440p average 83 FPS, which is still comfortably above 60 FPS and suitable for high refresh rate gaming, though not at the extreme levels seen at 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the highest resolution, the combo’s performance drops significantly. Low settings at 4K average 94 FPS, which is playable but a far cry from the 256 FPS seen at 1080p Low. Medium settings at 4K average 74 FPS, with a minimum of 63 and a maximum of 85 FPS, making it the only 4K preset that maintains an average above 60 FPS. High settings at 4K average 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS mark. Ultra settings at 4K average 46 FPS, which may be acceptable for some players but falls short of smooth performance standards. The data shows that the combo’s performance scales predictably with resolution, and the biggest drop occurs when moving from 1440p to 4K, particularly at higher settings.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combos for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 ranks 775 out of 3005 tested combinations. This places it in the top 26% of all tested combos, which is a strong result given the demanding nature of Fivem’s multiplayer environments. The ranking reflects the combined capabilities of both the CPU and GPU, and the data shows that this combo is well-suited for high-performance gaming in this title.
The combo’s ranking is particularly notable when considering the CPU’s benchmark performance. The Core Ultra 9 275HX sits in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include server-class processors like the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and AMD EPYC 4484PX. The GPU, the RTX 5080, is in the 87th percentile among all GPUs, with rivals such as the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which is 2.2% faster in average benchmark score. The combination of a top-tier CPU and a high-end GPU results in a system that can handle Fivem’s demands across a wide range of settings and resolutions.
When comparing this combo to others in the database, the rank of 775 suggests that while there are many faster combinations, this system is far from the bottom. The data implies that for most players, this combo would provide an excellent Fivem experience, especially at 1080p and 1440p where the frame rates are consistently high. At 4K, the combo can still deliver playable performance at Medium settings, which reflects the RTX 5080’s capabilities. The ranking also indicates that the CPU is not a weak link in this system, as its high percentile ranking ensures it can keep up with the GPU’s output.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the best settings preset depends on the player’s resolution and performance goals. For players with a 1080p monitor, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 126 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 1080p offers 162 FPS, which is even faster, but the visual difference between High and Ultra may not justify the performance drop for all players. For those with high refresh rate monitors, the Medium preset at 1080p (202 FPS) or even Low (256 FPS) could be used to maximize frame rates.
At 1440p, the High preset is the best overall choice, averaging 107 FPS. This provides a good balance between visual fidelity and performance, and it is well-suited for 144Hz monitors. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 133 FPS, which is also an excellent option for players who prioritize frame rate over visual quality. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 83 FPS, which is still playable but may not be ideal for competitive play where higher frame rates are preferred. The Low preset at 1440p (169 FPS) is an option for those who want the absolute highest frame rates, but the visual downgrade is significant.
For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it is the only one that averages above 60 FPS, with a score of 74 FPS. The Low preset at 4K averages 94 FPS, which is even smoother, but the visual quality is noticeably reduced. The High preset at 4K averages 59 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS target and may result in occasional dips during intense scenes. The Ultra preset at 4K averages 46 FPS, which is not recommended for a smooth experience. Ultimately, the data suggests that players should adjust their settings based on their resolution and whether they prioritize visual quality or frame rate.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a high-end graphics card based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, with a 5 nm process node. It features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. Its base clock is 2295 MHz, with a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The memory clock is 1875 MHz, which translates to 30 Gbps effective. These specifications make the RTX 5080 a powerful GPU that can handle demanding games like Fivem at high resolutions and settings.
In the context of Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes increasingly important as resolution and settings increase. At 1080p, the GPU has less work to do, and the CPU can often keep up, resulting in very high frame rates. However, as the resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 46, which is a significant reduction from the 256 FPS seen at 1080p Low. This indicates that the RTX 5080’s compute power, measured at 56.28 TFLOPS for FP32, is being fully utilized at higher resolutions.
The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is also a factor, as Fivem can use a significant amount of memory for textures and game world data. The 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that data can be transferred quickly between the GPU and its memory, which is important for maintaining smooth performance. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 36565 and its 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs place it as a top-tier card, though it is outperformed by the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which is 2.2% faster in average benchmark score. The RTX 5080’s launch MSRP is 999 USD, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest gaming APIs.
The GPU’s performance in Fivem, as measured by the FPS data, shows that it is capable of delivering high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles to maintain 60 FPS at 4K with Ultra settings. This suggests that for 4K gaming, players should use Medium or Low settings to achieve a smooth experience. The GPU’s strong performance in the Passmark G3D benchmark, with a score of 36565, confirms that it is a powerful card, but the demands of 4K gaming are substantial. Overall, the RTX 5080 plays a crucial role in this combo, and its capabilities are well-matched with the Core Ultra 9 275HX, resulting in a system that excels at high refresh rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, and is capable of 4K gaming with adjusted settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 92.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 115.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 146.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 129.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 166.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 209.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 263.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 197.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 252.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 314.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 390.0 |
Fivem with iUltra 9 275HX + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 275HX + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.