Fivem

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Fivem?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900M ranks 1,575th out of 3,707 tested combinations, placing it in the 42.5th percentile of all combos tested in this game.

Q: How much performance does the RX 7900M deliver relative to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 7900M's average benchmark score of 97,487 is 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro VII, 5.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Instinct MI60, and 6.3% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A4500. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 leads it by 4.3%.

Q: What is the best FPS result recorded across all tested configurations?

A: The highest average FPS is 214, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The lowest average is 38 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Core Ultra 9 275HX's average benchmark score of 67,469 is 0.3% lower than the Intel Xeon w5-3525, 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4484PX, and 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. It is 0.7% higher than the Intel Xeon 6515P.

Q: What is the FPS difference between 1080p and 4K at Medium settings?

A: At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 169 at 1920x1080 to 111 at 2560x1440, and further to 62 at 3840x2160. This represents a 63.3% reduction from 1080p to 4K.

Q: What memory specifications does the GPU use?

A: The RX 7900M features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900M is the primary driver of Fivem's visual output, and its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides ample capacity for the game's asset streaming at high resolutions. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s — a figure that proves critical when moving large texture datasets typical of multiplayer environments.

The GPU's base clock is 1825 MHz, boosting to 2090 MHz under load. These clocks, combined with 4608 shading units, 288 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, produce a pixel rate of 401.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 601.9 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput of 38.52 TFLOPS indicates substantial raw compute headroom.

Benchmark results show the GPU's percentile rank at 94 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 97,487. In Fivem specifically, the data reveals the GPU's influence scales directly with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo hits 214 FPS, suggesting the GPU is not the limiting factor at lower loads. However, at 3840x2160 Ultra, FPS collapses to 38, indicating the GPU's rendering pipeline becomes saturated.

The RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, uses 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The 72 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 ensure modern API compatibility, though Fivem's engine does not heavily leverage ray tracing features. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for data transfer, and its 180 W TDP reflects a mobile-focused design with portable device-dependent display outputs.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and AMD Radeon RX 7900M ranks 1,575th out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem. This positions the pair in the lower-middle range of all tested configurations, which is notable given the individual component performance levels.

The CPU's percentile rank of 94 among all processors and the GPU's identical 94th percentile rank suggest both components perform well in isolation. Yet the combo's in-game rank of 1,575 indicates that Fivem's specific demands do not fully align with the strengths of this hardware pairing.

The data shows a substantial spread between the CPU's synthetic benchmark performance and the GPU's. The Core Ultra 9 275HX averages 67,469 across all CPU benchmarks, while the RX 7900M averages 97,487 across GPU benchmarks. This imbalance suggests the GPU has more raw compute headroom relative to its peer group than the CPU does, which may explain why the combo does not rank higher in a multiplayer title that often stresses both components.

Among the 3,707 tested combos, this pairing sits at roughly the 57.5th percentile from the bottom, meaning about 2,132 combos perform worse and 1,574 perform better. The rank reflects a system that can deliver playable frame rates at most settings but falls short of top-tier performance in Fivem's demanding multiplayer scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong results across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 214 FPS, which drops to 169 FPS at Medium, 135 FPS at High, and 105 FPS at Ultra. The Medium setting shows a minimum of 143 FPS and a maximum of 194 FPS, indicating some frame pacing variance but generally smooth gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the FPS figures scale down proportionally. Low settings yield 141 FPS on average, Medium drops to 111 FPS (with a min of 94 and max of 128), High falls to 89 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 69 FPS. The step from 1080p to 1440p at Low represents a 34.1% reduction, while the Ultra setting sees a 34.3% reduction.

At 3840x2160, the performance degradation becomes more pronounced. Low settings average 78 FPS, Medium averages 62 FPS (min 52, max 71), High averages 49 FPS, and Ultra averages 38 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 38 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold typically considered smooth, while 4K Low remains playable at 78 FPS.

The delta between settings at each resolution is consistent. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 109 FPS (214 vs 105). At 1440p, that gap narrows to 72 FPS (141 vs 69). At 4K, the gap shrinks further to 40 FPS (78 vs 38). This pattern indicates that the GPU becomes increasingly constrained as resolution rises, reducing the impact of settings adjustments.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals critical insights about the limiting component in this system. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 214 at 1920x1080 to 78 at 3840x2160, a 63.6% reduction. At Medium settings, the drop is from 169 to 62, a 63.3% reduction. High settings see a drop from 135 to 49, a 63.7% reduction, and Ultra falls from 105 to 38, a 63.8% reduction.

These near-uniform percentage drops across all settings are a clear indicator that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The consistent scaling factor — approximately 63-64% reduction regardless of settings — suggests the rendering load scales predictably with pixel count, and the RX 7900M's throughput limits become the dominant factor.

At 1080p, the high FPS values (135-214 depending on settings) suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately, and the system is not severely constrained by either component. The transition to 1440p shows a more moderate decline, with FPS remaining above 69 even at Ultra. However, the jump to 4K exposes the GPU's limitations, as even Low settings cannot maintain 100 FPS.

The data indicates that the Core Ultra 9 275HX provides sufficient single-thread performance to avoid bottlenecking at lower resolutions, but the RX 7900M's 38.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra in Fivem. Users targeting 4K would need to select Low or Medium settings to achieve playable performance, while 1080p and 1440p offer much more flexibility.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX contributes to Fivem's performance through its 24 cores and 24 threads, running at a base clock of 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This Arrow Lake-HX architecture, built on TSMC's 3 nm process, includes 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, which helps with the game's frequent context switches in multiplayer scenarios.

The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded capabilities: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,589 and a single-core score of 2,204, with Geekbench scores of 20,795 multi-core and 2,458 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 55,759 and a single-thread score of 4,713, indicating solid per-core performance that matters for Fivem's game logic and AI processing.

The 55 W TDP is modest for a 24-core part, but the boost clock of 5.40 GHz compensates in lightly-threaded workloads. The CPU's percentile rank of 94 among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 67,469, places it within 0.6% of its nearest rivals — the Intel Xeon w5-3525, AMD EPYC 4484PX, and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. This tight clustering suggests the 275HX delivers competitive performance for its class.

The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate memory throughput for Fivem's data streaming, though it is lower than the GPU's 576.0 GB/s. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes ensures the GPU can communicate without interface bottlenecks. In Fivem, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings, where FPS exceeds 200 — a range that demands strong single-thread performance to process the game's simulation and network code efficiently.