Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

This combination of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and AMD Radeon 760M ranks at 2995 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 0.3% of all configurations. This is a decisively poor result for this specific game, and the data indicates that the GPU is the overwhelming bottleneck. The ranking is not a reflection of the CPU's capability, which sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs tested, but rather a direct consequence of pairing a top-tier mobile processor with an integrated graphics solution that lands in the 35th percentile of all GPUs.

The delta between these two components' standings is stark. The CPU's average benchmark score of 67469 places it within 0.7% of the Intel Xeon 6515P, and it is effectively tied with the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (deltaPct of -0.3%) and AMD EPYC 4484PX (deltaPct of -0.5%). In contrast, the GPU's average score of 6019 puts it in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, with deltaPct values of 0.3% respectively. This is a fundamental mismatch. The data suggests that this combo is not viable for a playable Fivem experience at any of the measured settings, as even the best-case scenario produces an average frame rate that is below standard playability thresholds.

The benchmark results consistently show that the system is constrained by the integrated GPU. The CPU's immense processing power, evidenced by its 35589 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 55759 in Passmark multithread, is left largely unused because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to keep up. This is a classic case of a severe bottleneck, where the graphics processor is the limiting factor in every single one of the twelve measured configurations. For users looking to play Fivem, this specific hardware pairing should be considered a non-starter, as the performance ceiling is too low for a smooth experience.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 760M is the definitive limiting component in this configuration. It is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. Its specifications are modest: 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and can boost up to 2599 MHz. Its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's DDR5 memory rather than dedicated VRAM, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

In Fivem, this translates to consistently low frame rates across all resolutions and settings. The data shows that the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 5310 and its DirectX 12 score of just 25 are indicative of its limited rendering capability. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 further confirms this. The GPU's percentile ranking of 35 versus all other GPUs highlights that it is not designed for demanding gaming workloads, and Fivem's multiplayer environment appears to be particularly taxing on it.

The performance deltas to its nearest rivals are telling. The 760M is essentially on par with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (deltaPct of 0.3%) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (deltaPct of 0.3%), both of which are old or low-end parts. It is also within 0.4% of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, which is a professional workstation GPU, and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA Quadro P2000. These comparisons show that the 760M's performance class is far below what is needed for a modern multiplayer game like Fivem. The GPU's clock speed of 2599 MHz boost does not compensate for its lack of raw compute resources and memory bandwidth, resulting in the low FPS figures seen in the measured data.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases, reinforcing the GPU-bound nature of this combo. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 54 FPS. Dropping to 2560x1440 reduces that to 36 FPS, a 33% decrease. At 3840x2160, the average falls to 20 FPS, a further 44% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline with resolution is a classic symptom of a GPU that is running out of pixel-pushing capability.

The same trend is observable at Medium settings. From 43 FPS at 1080p, the average drops to 28 FPS at 1440p and then to 16 FPS at 4K. At High settings, the numbers are 34 FPS at 1080p, 23 FPS at 1440p, and 13 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most severe scaling, starting at 27 FPS at 1080p, falling to 17 FPS at 1440p, and bottoming out at 10 FPS at 4K. This consistent pattern across all presets indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, as a CPU-bound system would show less dramatic FPS changes when resolution is altered.

The data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings at a given resolution is significant. At 1080p, the difference between Low (54 FPS) and Ultra (27 FPS) is exactly a 50% reduction. At 1440p, the gap is from 36 FPS to 17 FPS, also a 50% reduction. At 4K, the drop is from 20 FPS to 10 FPS, again a 50% reduction. This linear scaling of performance loss with settings and resolution confirms that the GPU is the primary constraint. For any hope of a playable experience, the user must stay at 1080p with the lowest possible settings, and even then, the frame rate is marginal.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 54 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset. This is the only configuration in the measured data that comes close to a standard 60 FPS target.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck for this game?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The CPU, an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, is a top-tier processor in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, but the GPU is in the 35th percentile. The FPS drops significantly as resolution increases, which is the hallmark of a GPU-limited system.

Q: How does this combo compare to other GPUs in its performance class?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 6019. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6400 with a deltaPct of 0.3%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M with a deltaPct of 0.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 with a deltaPct of -0.5%. These are all older or low-end parts, indicating the 760M is not suited for demanding games.

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K resolution?

A: No, the data shows it cannot. At 3840x2160 resolution, the average FPS ranges from 20 FPS on Low settings to 10 FPS on Ultra settings. These frame rates are far below the threshold for a playable gaming experience.

Q: What is the difference in FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is a 50% reduction. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 54 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 27 FPS. This shows that the GPU's limited resources are heavily taxed by higher graphical fidelity.

Q: What does the combo's rank of 2995 out of 3005 mean?

A: It means that this specific CPU and GPU pairing performs worse than 99.7% of all other tested combinations in Fivem. This rank is a direct consequence of the GPU's low performance, as the CPU itself is highly capable compared to other processors.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the only viable settings for this combo in Fivem are at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset. This configuration yields an average FPS of 54, which, while not ideal, is the only setting that approaches a playable frame rate. The Medium preset at 1080p averages 43 FPS, which is a noticeable step down, while High and Ultra drop to 34 FPS and 27 FPS respectively.

At 2560x1440, even the Low preset only manages 36 FPS, which is below the standard for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at this resolution drops to 28 FPS, and High and Ultra fall to 23 FPS and 17 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, all presets are unplayable, with the best being Low at 20 FPS and the worst being Ultra at 10 FPS.

The data shows a clear linear relationship: lowering settings from Ultra to Low at any given resolution yields roughly a 50% FPS improvement. However, this improvement is not enough to make higher resolutions playable. The recommendation is to use 1920x1080 with the Low preset as the baseline. If a user insists on slightly better visuals, the Medium preset at 1080p is the only other option that maintains an average above 40 FPS. Anything above this resolution or preset will result in a sub-30 FPS experience, which is not recommended for a multiplayer game where responsiveness is critical. The minimum FPS data for the Medium presets (36 FPS at 1080p, 24 FPS at 1440p, and 13 FPS at 4K) further shows that frame time consistency degrades as resolution increases.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is an exceptionally powerful mobile processor that plays a minimal role in this combo's Fivem performance. It features 24 cores and 24 threads, based on the Arrow Lake architecture and built on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Its memory bandwidth is rated at 102.4 GB/s with dual-channel DDR5 support.

In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU is a powerhouse. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 35589, and its single-core score is 2204. The Geekbench multi-core score is 20795, and the single-core score is 2458. In Passmark tests, it scores 55759 in multithread, 4713 in single thread, and 191186 in floating point math. These figures place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 67469. Its nearest rivals are all server or workstation-class processors, such as the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (deltaPct of -0.3%) and AMD EPYC 4484PX (deltaPct of -0.5%).

However, in the context of Fivem with this GPU, the CPU's power is largely irrelevant. The measured FPS data shows that the system is entirely GPU-bound, as the CPU can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames. The CPU's high core count and clock speeds do not translate into higher FPS because the rendering pipeline is the bottleneck. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU with data, but the GPU cannot keep up. This is evidenced by the fact that the FPS scales directly with resolution and settings, which are GPU-dependent variables, rather than CPU-dependent ones. In this specific combo, the CPU is a wasted resource, as its capabilities are not utilized to their potential due to the severe GPU limitation.