Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile occupies a mid-pack position in the Fivem benchmark database. With a combined rank of 2264 out of 3707 tested configurations, this combo sits in the lower half of the performance spectrum, placing it at roughly the 39th percentile among all tested setups. This ranking suggests that while the hardware is capable of delivering playable frame rates, it is not positioned among the top-tier performers for this specific multiplayer title.

The data reveals a significant gap between this combo and the leading configurations, yet the measured results show a system that can handle the game's demands across various settings. The ranking is particularly telling when considering the hardware's individual benchmark scores. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 35670 places it in the 85th percentile against all CPUs, which is a strong result. However, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 22729 sits in the 67th percentile against all GPUs, indicating a potential imbalance where the processor is relatively stronger than the graphics card in this pairing.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2264 out of 3707 tested combinations provides a clear starting point for analysis. This places the system in the bottom 40% of all tested Fivem configurations, which is a notable finding given the individual component specifications. The data indicates that this is not a high-end pairing for this game, but rather a competent mid-range solution that requires careful settings management to achieve smooth gameplay.

When examining the individual component performance, the CPU’s nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has an average score of 35719, which is only 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H. Similarly, the Intel Core 7 250H scores 35728, a 0.2% difference, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35802, a 0.4% difference. These minuscule deltas indicate that the CPU is benchmarked within a tightly contested group of processors, where performance differences are negligible in real-world terms.

The GPU’s rival comparisons are more revealing. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.7% higher than the RTX 4060 Mobile. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22549, a 0.8% difference, and the Intel Arc B580 scores 23021, a 1.3% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435, which is 1.3% lower. These figures suggest the RTX 4060 Mobile is positioned in a competitive segment where no single rival has a decisive advantage, making the measured FPS in Fivem particularly dependent on the game's specific optimization for this architecture.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process. Its base clock runs at 3.90 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.10 GHz. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W and supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache.

In Fivem, a multiplayer modification for Grand Theft Auto V, the CPU's role is often more pronounced than in single-player titles due to the complex server-side scripting and player interactions. The data shows that the processor's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17984.5, likely helps in maintaining frame rates when many entities are present. The single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1810.5, is also relevant, as many game logic threads still rely on single-thread efficiency.

The 16-core configuration with 22 threads provides substantial headroom for background processes and the game's various subsystems. The Passmark multithread score of 29376 indicates robust parallel processing capability. However, the game's engine may not fully utilize all 16 cores, meaning the boost clock of 5.10 GHz becomes crucial for maintaining responsiveness in scenarios where fewer threads are active. The CPU’s performance is further contextualized by its average benchmark score of 35670, which is within 0.7% of its nearest rival, suggesting that the processor is not the limiting factor in this combo's overall rank.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The memory runs at an effective speed of 16 Gbps.

For Fivem, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor, especially at higher resolutions. The measured FPS data shows a clear correlation between settings and performance, which is typical for a GPU that is more constrained than the CPU in this pairing. The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.61 TFLOPS provides a baseline for its raw computational power, but the game's engine and its draw calls will determine how this translates to frame rates.

The RTX 4060 Mobile's benchmark scores show a DirectX 12 score of 73 in Passmark, while DirectX 11 scores 157. This disparity is interesting for Fivem, which may rely on different API paths depending on the version and configuration. The Vulkan score of 89569 in Geekbench suggests the GPU handles modern graphics APIs well. However, the game's performance at 4K with Ultra settings, dropping to 30 FPS, indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at these extreme settings. The GPU's 67th percentile ranking against all GPUs reinforces the idea that while capable, it is not a top-tier mobile graphics solution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves an average of 168 FPS on Low settings, which drops to 133 FPS on Medium, 106 FPS on High, and 82 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting shows a minimum of 113 FPS and a maximum of 153 FPS, indicating a playable range with some fluctuation.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings yield 111 FPS average, Medium produces 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 and maximum of 100, High delivers 70 FPS, and Ultra drops to 54 FPS. The 1440p results show that the system remains capable of high refresh rate gaming on lower settings, but Ultra settings begin to push the hardware toward the edge of smooth playability.

At 3840x2160, the data reveals the system's limitations. Low settings average 61 FPS, which is still playable, but Medium drops to 48 FPS with a minimum of 41 FPS. High settings average 39 FPS, and Ultra falls to 30 FPS. The 4K results indicate that this combo is not suited for high-fidelity gaming at this resolution, as even Medium settings dip below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider essential for a smooth experience.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals significant insights into which component is limiting performance. Starting with Low settings, the system achieves 168 FPS at 1080p, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 61 FPS at 4K. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 45% drop from 1440p to 4K. The scaling is not linear, indicating that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and fill rate are becoming increasingly strained at higher resolutions.

With High settings, the scaling is more dramatic. The system hits 106 FPS at 1080p, 70 FPS at 1440p, and 39 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is particularly steep, showing a 56% reduction. This suggests that at High settings, the GPU is nearing its limits, and the 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for the texture demands at 4K, causing additional overhead.

The data points to the GPU as the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU’s strong performance, with its 85th percentile ranking, suggests it can keep up with the game’s logic even as the GPU struggles. The FPS scaling pattern, where performance degrades more rapidly at higher resolutions, is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound scenario. The RTX 4060 Mobile’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth becomes a constraint when pushing 4K resolutions, as the game requires more data to be transferred per frame.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60 FPS in Fivem?

A: At 2560x1440 with Low settings, the system achieves 111 FPS average, while High settings produce 70 FPS. Both comfortably exceed the 60 FPS threshold. At 4K, only Low settings with an average of 61 FPS manage to stay above 60 FPS, making 1440p the most reliable resolution for consistent high frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H has an average benchmark score of 35670. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, scores 35719, which is only 0.1% higher. The Intel Core 7 250H is 0.2% higher with 35728, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is 0.4% higher with 35802. These differences are negligible in practice.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings average 168 FPS, while Ultra settings average 82 FPS. This represents a 51% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset, showing the significant performance cost of Ultra settings.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the more likely bottleneck in this combo?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU ranks in the 85th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 67th percentile. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows steep drops, particularly at High settings, which is characteristic of GPU limitations.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values for Medium settings at different resolutions?

A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum FPS is 113. At 2560x1440 Medium, it drops to 74. At 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum is 41. These values show that even Medium settings can produce framerate dips that may be noticeable, especially at 4K.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score relate to its performance in Fivem?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 22729, placing it in the 67th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, scores 22895, which is 0.7% higher. This close benchmark alignment suggests the RTX 4060 Mobile should perform similarly to a desktop RTX 2080 in Fivem, which aligns with the measured FPS being playable but not exceptional at higher settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, High settings provide an average of 106 FPS, which is an excellent balance between visual fidelity and performance. The jump to Ultra reduces the average to 82 FPS, which is still playable but may introduce noticeable frame drops in crowded multiplayer scenarios. For players prioritizing maximum frame rates, Medium settings at 133 FPS average offer a significant boost without a major visual compromise.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts to High settings with an average of 70 FPS. This provides a smooth experience for most players, though those with high refresh rate monitors may prefer Low settings at 111 FPS for competitive advantage. Ultra settings at 54 FPS are borderline, as the minimum FPS may dip below the 50 FPS mark in intense situations, leading to a less consistent experience.

For 3840x2160, the data strongly suggests sticking with Low settings, which average 61 FPS. Medium settings drop to 48 FPS, and High falls to 39 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The 4K resolution presents a significant challenge for this combo, and players seeking 4K performance will need to accept substantial visual compromises. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors here, making it difficult to recommend anything above Low settings for 4K gaming on this hardware.