Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer title, and the data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon 880M shows a configuration that is strictly limited by its integrated graphics. The measured results place this combo near the very bottom of our tested database, ranking 2933 out of 3005 combos. This is not a system for high-refresh gaming; rather, the data indicates a setup that can manage playable frame rates only at 1080p with compromises. The numbers reveal a stark reality: the CPU has ample headroom, but the GPU is the definitive bottleneck across all resolutions and settings.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data shows a predictable and severe drop as resolution increases, confirming that the AMD Radeon 880M is the primary limiting component. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 74 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings drops that average to 49 FPS, a reduction of 25 FPS. At 4K, the average collapses to 27 FPS. This pattern is consistent across all quality presets, indicating that the GPU is struggling to fill the increasing pixel count.

When we look at the scaling from 1080p to 4K, the performance loss is dramatic. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS falls from 47 at 1080p to 31 at 1440p, and then to 17 at 4K. This represents a roughly 64% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. At Ultra settings, the drop is equally steep, from 36 FPS at 1080p down to 24 FPS at 1440p and a barely playable 13 FPS at 4K. The trend is uniform: the higher the resolution, the more the GPU is overwhelmed, and the less relevant the CPU becomes.

The data suggests that 4K is not a viable option for this combo in Fivem. Even the best-case scenario at 4K, which is Low settings, yields only 27 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. The 1440p results are marginally better but still fall short of a consistently smooth experience, with the highest average being 49 FPS on Low settings. The only resolution where the combo approaches playable territory is 1080p. Here, the scaling from Low to Ultra shows a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and performance, with a 38 FPS difference between the lowest and highest quality presets.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its benchmark scores are substantial, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and a single-core score of 1743. This places the CPU in the 83rd percentile of all tested processors, indicating strong performance that is unlikely to be the limiting factor in Fivem. The PassMark multi-thread score of 24873 and single-thread score of 3468 further reinforce that this is a capable processor for general and multi-threaded workloads.

However, the CPU's performance in this specific game combo is largely irrelevant. The measured FPS numbers show that the system is GPU-bound at every resolution and setting tested. For example, at 1080p Low, the CPU could theoretically push far more frames than the 74 FPS average the Radeon 880M can render. The bottleneck is not the processor's ability to calculate game logic or AI, but rather the GPU's ability to draw the frame. The data indicates that even at 4K Ultra, where the CPU might be expected to work harder, the frame rate is only 13 FPS, a clear sign the GPU is completely saturated.

The CPU's high core and thread count, along with its 24 MB of shared L3 cache, are positive attributes for a multitasking environment or for other applications, but for Fivem, they do not translate into higher frame rates. The processor's benchmark results place it near the Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, with a deltaPct of 0% and 0.1% respectively. This shows it is a competitive mobile processor. Yet, its performance is wasted in this pairing, as the integrated GPU cannot keep up, leaving the CPU's resources largely idle in terms of frame generation. The data suggests that the CPU is not a source of bottleneck, but its potential is untapped.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 880M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, with a boost clock of 2900 MHz and 768 shading units. Its performance, as measured by PassMark G3D, is 7615, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. This is a low score, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, with deltaPct values of 0.1% and -0.3% respectively. This clearly demonstrates that the 880M is an entry-level graphics solution, even by mobile standards.

The GPU's 16 ROPs and 48 TMUs are modest figures, and its memory bandwidth is "System Dependent," which means it shares system memory, often leading to lower performance than dedicated VRAM. The data shows this limitation clearly. In Fivem, the GPU is overwhelmed at higher resolutions. At 4K, even Low settings only produce 27 FPS, and Ultra settings plummet to 13 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 14 FPS, showing that the GPU cannot handle the increased shader complexity and texture loads.

The 880M's performance is the single most important factor in this combo's ranking. The GPU's limited pixel rate of 46.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s are insufficient for the demands of a modern title like Fivem at high resolutions. The benchmark results indicate that this is a GPU suited for light gaming or esports titles at 1080p, not for a demanding multiplayer game with high settings. The data confirms that the GPU is the sole reason for the low frame rates, and any attempt to improve performance must focus on this component.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon 880M combination ranks 2933 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the bottom 2.4% of all configurations, a very poor result. The data indicates that this combo is significantly outclassed by the vast majority of systems in our database. The ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's low performance, as the CPU is in the 83rd percentile and is clearly not the cause of the poor results.

This ranking is consistent with the GPU's individual percentile of 43. The combo's performance is dragged down by the weakest link, which is the integrated graphics. While the CPU is a strong performer, its capabilities are rendered moot by the GPU's inability to process frames quickly. The result is a system that, in terms of gaming, performs similarly to a decade-old dedicated GPU, as indicated by the 880M's nearest rivals.

The data shows that this is not a balanced configuration for gaming. A user would achieve far better results by pairing a dedicated GPU with this CPU. The high CPU rank of 83rd percentile does not compensate for the GPU's lowly 43rd percentile. The combo rank is a clear indicator that this setup is intended for productivity or light, non-demanding tasks, rather than for playing Fivem at acceptable performance levels. For this game, the combo is a poor choice, and the data strongly suggests looking for a different GPU solution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at the combo's performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the results are the most playable. With Low settings, the average FPS is 74, which is smooth. Medium settings yield an average of 59 FPS, with a minimum of 50 and a maximum of 67. High settings drop the average to 47 FPS. Ultra settings are the most demanding, producing an average of 36 FPS, which is borderline playable but may feel stuttery in busy scenes.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance takes a significant hit. Low settings produce an average of 49 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. Medium settings drop to an average of 39 FPS, with a minimum of 33 and a maximum of 44. High settings yield 31 FPS, which is on the edge of playability. Ultra settings produce an average of 24 FPS, which is not smooth enough for a fluid experience.

At 3840x2160, the combo is not viable for gaming. Low settings yield an average of 27 FPS. Medium settings drop to 21 FPS, with a minimum of 18 and a maximum of 25. High settings produce only 17 FPS. Ultra settings are the worst, with an average of 13 FPS. These numbers are all well below the threshold for acceptable gameplay. The data shows a clear step-down in performance at each higher resolution, with 1080p being the only reasonable choice for this configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings and resolution combination for this PC in Fivem?

A: Based on the data, the best combination is 1920x1080 with Low settings, which produces an average of 74 FPS. If you prefer visual quality, 1080p Medium offers a 59 FPS average, which is still playable.

Q: Can this PC run Fivem at 4K?

A: The data indicates no. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 27 FPS on Low settings, which is too low for a smooth experience. All other settings at 4K produce averages below 22 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M GPU is the overwhelming bottleneck. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 43rd percentile. The FPS data confirms the GPU is the limiting factor at all tested resolutions.

Q: How does this combo compare to other tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 2933 out of 3005, placing it in the bottom 2.4% of all tested combos. Its performance is severely limited by the integrated GPU.

Q: What kind of performance can be expected at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 31 at 2560x1440 with High settings. This is generally considered below the threshold for smooth, competitive gameplay.

Q: Is there a significant difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: Yes, the difference is substantial. At 1080p, Low settings produce 74 FPS, while Ultra settings produce only 36 FPS. This is a 38 FPS difference, showing a major performance cost for higher visual fidelity.