Fivem

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the Intel Arc B370 presents a striking contrast in Fivem: a top-tier 24-core processor constrained by an entry-level integrated GPU. The measured results across resolutions and settings reveal a system where the CPU’s potential is largely untapped, with the graphics solution acting as the definitive bottleneck. This combination, ranking 2762 out of 3005 tested combos, delivers playable frame rates only at the lowest settings and resolutions.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and can boost up to 6.00 GHz, a specification that places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs tested. This high single-thread performance is evident in its benchmarks, such as a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2655. In a multiplayer title like Fivem, which often relies on a few primary threads for game logic and physics, this strong single-core throughput should theoretically provide a solid foundation.

However, the actual frame rates tell a different story. At 1080p with Low settings, the combination averages 80 FPS, and at High settings it drops to 50 FPS. These numbers are modest for a CPU of this caliber, indicating that the processor is not the limiting factor. The CPU's massive multi-threaded capabilities, reflected in a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 and a Passmark multithread score of 58674, are largely irrelevant for this workload because the graphics pipeline cannot feed frames fast enough to utilize them. The data suggests that the i9-14900K is spending most of its time idle, waiting for the Intel Arc B370 to render each frame.

The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals confirms its raw strength. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900KF by just 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus by 0.6% in average benchmark score. It actually surpasses the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 by 1.7%. These are marginal differences, showing that the i9-14900K is at the apex of CPU performance. Yet, this dominance never translates into high FPS in Fivem because the measured data shows the GPU is the binding constraint. The processor’s 36 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory are features that would benefit a less constrained system, but here they have little impact on the final output. The CPU is a high-performance engine connected to a severely restricted exhaust.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of settings, with a significant trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate. At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 80 FPS, which is the only configuration that approaches a high-refresh-rate experience. Moving to Medium drops the average to 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. High settings yield 50 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to 39 FPS. For a smooth and responsive experience in a multiplayer environment, the Low preset is the only viable option at this resolution.

At 1440p, the situation becomes more challenging. The Low preset averages 53 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. Medium settings produce 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS, which may result in noticeable stutter during busy scenes. High and Ultra settings drop to 33 FPS and 26 FPS, respectively, making them unsuitable for fast-paced gameplay. The 4K results are impractical for gaming, with even the Low preset averaging only 29 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K shows a min FPS of 20, which is well below the threshold for comfortable play.

Based on the data, the best experience is achieved with the Low preset at 1080p, as it is the only setting that provides a frame rate high enough to be considered fluid. For users who prioritize visual quality over frame rate, the Medium preset at 1080p is the highest setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS. At 1440p, the Low preset is the only reasonable choice, as anything higher compromises playability. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it is the lowest performing option, dragging the average FPS down to 39 at 1080p and 14 at 4K. The data strongly suggests that users should stick to the lowest settings to maximize performance with this hardware combination.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The frame rate scaling across resolutions is a textbook example of a GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 80 at 1080p to 53 at 1440p, a 33.75% decrease. Moving from 1440p to 4K, the FPS falls from 53 to 29, another 45.28% reduction. This steep decline is directly proportional to the increase in pixel count, indicating that the Intel Arc B370 is working at its maximum capacity. The GPU’s rendering workload scales with resolution, and its limited processing power cannot keep up as the pixel demand grows.

This pattern is consistent across all settings presets. For example, at High settings, the average FPS is 50 at 1080p, 33 at 1440p, and 18 at 4K. The relative drops are similar, confirming that the GPU is the consistent bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect the frame rate to remain relatively flat as resolution increases, since the CPU's workload (game logic, draw calls) would stay constant. Instead, the frame rate plummets, proving that the Intel Arc B370's fill rate and shading power are the primary constraints.

The GPU’s specifications support this conclusion. The Arc B370 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz and 1280 shading units, but its performance is comparable to much older hardware. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and it trades blows with the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770 in benchmark scores. This is an entry-level integrated graphics solution, and its inability to handle higher resolutions is expected. The data clearly shows that the i9-14900K is not the limiting factor; the Arc B370 is, and it caps the system's performance at 1080p.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combined performance of the Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Arc B370 in Fivem is ranked 2762 out of 3005 tested combinations. This places it in the bottom 8% of all systems tested, which is a surprisingly low position given the CPU's high standing. The rank underscores the severe imbalance of this pairing. While the CPU is in the 95th percentile of all processors, the GPU is in the 5th percentile, and this weak link drags the entire system down to a lowly position.

This ranking is not a reflection of the CPU's capabilities but rather a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations. The data shows that the i9-14900K is far more powerful than what this game requires, but the Arc B370 cannot deliver the frames to utilize that power. In a system with a more capable graphics card, this CPU would likely rank much higher. However, as configured, the combination is held back by its weakest component, resulting in a poor overall standing.

The low ranking is further emphasized when comparing the GPU to its nearest rivals. The Arc B370’s average benchmark score of 1184 is nearly identical to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186) and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190). These are legacy parts from over a decade ago, indicating that the B370's performance is comparable to very old discrete graphics cards. This places the entire system in a performance tier that is simply not suited for modern gaming at high settings, explaining its position near the bottom of the combo rankings. The powerful CPU is essentially wasted in this configuration, as it cannot overcome the GPU's fundamental performance deficit.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system's main memory rather than having dedicated VRAM. The bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which means its performance is tied to the speed and configuration of the system's RAM. This is a fundamental limitation, as shared memory is slower and has higher latency than dedicated graphics memory.

The GPU has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units. It also features 10 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Despite these modern feature sets, its raw computational power is very low. The FP32 performance is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s. These numbers are minuscule compared to even entry-level discrete GPUs, which explains its poor performance in Fivem.

The GPU's benchmark results are stark. Its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1184, which puts it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This score is virtually identical to that of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770, both of which are ancient parts. The TDP of the GPU is 25 W, which is incredibly low, further confirming its position as an energy-efficient but low-performance solution. In Fivem, this translates to the low frame rates observed. The GPU simply cannot render the game's geometry and textures quickly enough, especially at higher resolutions and settings, leading to the sub-30 FPS results seen at 4K and the lackluster performance at 1440p.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this CPU and GPU in Fivem?

A: The data shows that the best experience is at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, which averages 80 FPS. This is the only configuration that provides a frame rate high enough for smooth gameplay. At 1440p, the Low preset averages 53 FPS, which is playable, while 4K is not recommended for any settings.

Q: Why is the frame rate so low in Fivem despite having a high-end CPU like the i9-14900K?

A: The benchmark results indicate the Intel Arc B370 GPU is the limiting factor. The frame rate drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a sign of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU's high performance, such as its 95th percentile ranking, is not utilized because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to keep up.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to other GPUs in terms of performance?

A: The Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is nearly identical to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770, indicating performance on par with very old, low-end hardware.

Q: What is the overall ranking of this specific hardware combination in Fivem?

A: This combination of the Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2762 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the bottom percentile of systems, a direct result of the GPU's limited performance.

Q: Is the Ultra settings preset viable for this system?

A: No. The measured data shows the Ultra preset yields the lowest average frame rates at all resolutions. At 1080p, it averages 39 FPS, at 1440p it drops to 26 FPS, and at 4K it produces only 14 FPS. These frame rates are not suitable for a smooth gaming experience.

Q: Does the CPU's high multi-threaded performance help in this game?

A: No. While the i9-14900K has a strong multi-core score of 39399.5 in Cinebench R23, it does not translate to higher FPS in Fivem. The frame rates are consistently low across all settings, confirming that the game is limited by the GPU's rendering capabilities, not the CPU's processing power.