Fivem

# How This Combo Ranks

The pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB places this combo at rank 1605 out of 1792 tested combinations in Fivem. That positions this system in the lower 10.4% of all tested configurations, which is a striking outcome given the CPU's high-end credentials. The rank suggests that the overall gaming experience is heavily constrained by the graphics card, as the CPU alone ranks in the 93rd percentile against all processors. The data shows a significant imbalance: a top-tier 16-core processor paired with a mid-range GPU that sits at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This combination yields a system that is functional for Fivem but far from competitive, with the GPU clearly acting as the primary bottleneck in nearly all scenarios measured.

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA107 chip, manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It features 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, along with 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1740 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s.

The 4 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor in Fivem's results. At 4K resolution with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 22.8, which is the lowest measured across all configurations. The limited VRAM likely causes texture thrashing and memory swapping at higher resolutions and quality presets, which explains the steep performance penalties. At 1080p with Low settings, the GPU manages 111.9 FPS, showing it can handle lighter loads, but the moment settings increase to Ultra at the same resolution, performance falls to 54.2 FPS. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit bus are modest figures, and the data suggests that the 4 GB capacity is the more limiting factor than raw compute throughput, given the dramatic FPS drops when resolution and settings demand more memory.

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals how performance scales across resolutions, and the pattern indicates a GPU-bound scenario. From 1080p to 1440p at High settings, the average FPS drops from 73.0 to 45.3, a 38% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K at the same settings, the FPS falls from 45.3 to 29.0, another 36% reduction. This consistent ~35-38% decline per resolution step suggests the GPU is the limiting component, as the CPU has ample headroom with 16 cores and 24 threads.

At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced: 111.9 FPS at 1080p drops to 74.1 FPS at 1440p (a 34% decline), then to 44.1 FPS at 4K (a 40% decline). The pattern holds across all presets, with Ultra settings showing 54.2 FPS at 1080p, 37.0 FPS at 1440p, and 22.8 FPS at 4K. The data implies that even at the lowest settings, the GPU cannot maintain playable framerates at 4K, and the 4 GB VRAM ceiling becomes apparent at higher resolutions regardless of quality preset.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the RTX 3050 4 GB delivers its best results. Low settings achieve 111.9 FPS average, which is the highest figure recorded for this combo. Medium settings produce 90.8 FPS, and High settings yield 73.0 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 54.2 FPS, which is still playable but noticeably lower than the other presets. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 57.7 FPS, showing a wide performance range depending on quality expectations.

At 2560x1440, performance degrades significantly. Low settings average 74.1 FPS, which is still smooth. Medium settings fall to 59.3 FPS, while High settings produce 45.3 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 37.0 FPS, which begins to feel less fluid for a multiplayer title like Fivem. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 37.1 FPS, narrower than at 1080p, indicating the GPU is increasingly strained.

At 3840x2160, the results are largely disappointing. Low settings average 44.1 FPS, which is borderline playable. Medium settings fall to 29.5 FPS, High settings produce 29.0 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 22.8 FPS. The data shows that 4K gaming is not a realistic option for this combo, as even Low settings barely maintain 44 FPS, and the VRAM limitation likely contributes to inconsistent frame pacing.

# Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience balances framerate and visual quality. At 1080p, High settings at 73.0 FPS provide a strong experience for a multiplayer game where responsiveness matters, while Medium at 90.8 FPS offers even more headroom with a modest visual sacrifice. Ultra at 54.2 FPS is playable but approaches the threshold where input latency could become noticeable in fast-paced scenarios.

At 1440p, Low settings at 74.1 FPS is the only preset that consistently stays above 60 FPS. Medium at 59.3 FPS is close but may dip below 60 in busy scenes. High at 45.3 FPS and Ultra at 37.0 FPS are not recommended for competitive play, as the framerate drops into a range where the game feel suffers. For 4K, no preset delivers an ideal experience; Low at 44.1 FPS is the best available, but it still falls short of smooth gameplay standards.

The data suggests that the sweet spot is 1080p with High settings, offering 73.0 FPS with reasonable visual fidelity. If framerate is the priority, 1080p Low at 111.9 FPS provides the maximum smoothness, while 1440p Low at 74.1 FPS is a viable alternative for those prioritizing resolution over detail.

# CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor with 16 cores and 24 threads, running at a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It has a 125 W TDP and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Benchmarks show strong synthetic performance: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 39000, Geekbench multicore reaches 17731, and Passmark multithread scores 45887. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 47282.

In Fivem, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU. The measured FPS scaling across resolutions follows a GPU-bound pattern, with framerates dropping consistently as resolution increases, regardless of CPU load. The 16-core processor is unlikely to be the limiting factor in any scenario, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and modest compute capabilities create the primary bottleneck. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5505 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4333, is more than sufficient for Fivem's typical single-threaded workloads. The data shows that even at 1080p Low with 111.9 FPS, the CPU is not holding back performance; rather, the GPU is delivering its maximum output.

# FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of smooth 1080p gaming in Fivem?

A: Yes, at 1080p with Low settings the combo averages 111.9 FPS, while High settings produce 73.0 FPS. Both are above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p?

A: Low settings at 1440p average 74.1 FPS, which is the only preset that consistently exceeds 60 FPS. Medium settings at 59.3 FPS are close but may dip below 60 FPS in demanding scenes.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K resolution in Fivem?

A: The data indicates 4K is not practical. Low settings average 44.1 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 22.8 FPS, making 4K gameplay generally unsatisfying.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 47282. The Core i7-13700KF scores 47334, which is 0.1% higher, while the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 47131, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core i9-12900F scores 47081, 0.4% lower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47527, 0.5% higher.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RTX 3050 4 GB has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The memory runs at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Q: Which component limits performance more in this combo?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU ranks in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The steep FPS drops with increasing resolution and settings confirm the GPU's bottleneck.