Fivem

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It features a 25 MB shared L3 cache and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability, scoring 28,838 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9,983 in 3dmark max threads. Its single-thread performance is also robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,071 and a 3dmark single-thread score of 1,043. The processor sits at the 85th percentile when compared to all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35,365)Skip. It is closely matched by its nearest rivals: the Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35,403 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35,305 (+0.2% delta), the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35,428 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35,287 (+0.2% delta). This data indicates that the i7-12700KF is essentially performance-equivalent to these four alternatives, with deltas of less than one percent in either direction. For a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification platform for Grand Theft Auto V, the balance between single-thread and multi-thread performance is crucial. The benchmark results show that the CPU is well-rounded, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3,984 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 34,092. The high boost clock of 5.00 GHz likely helps in scenarios where the game engine is reliant on a few fast cores, while the 20 threads provide headroom for background tasks or heavily populated server environments. The data suggests that the CPU has ample processing power to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most situations, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher and CPU workload per frame is more significant.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with an AD103 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process. It boasts 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units, along with 80 ray tracing cores and 320 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, with memory running at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective). Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. This substantial memory capacity and bandwidth are notable for a game like Fivem, which can be heavily modded and may require large textures and assets. The GPU's compute capabilities are significant, with an FP32 throughput of 52.22 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 34,245 in PassMark G3D and 219,065 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 86th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 54,209. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which scores 54,247 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54,828 (-1.1% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698 (-2.7% delta), and the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55,757 (-2.8% delta). The data shows that the RTX 4080 SUPER is marginally slower than the RTX 4080 by 0.1%, but it trails the AMD competitors by more noticeable margins of 1.1% to 2.8% in average benchmark score. For Fivem, the GPU's role is to render the game world, which can be graphically intensive depending on the mods and settings. The 16 GB VRAM is likely sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the high bandwidth helps maintain smooth frame rates. The measured FPS data shows that at 4K Ultra settings, the combo averages 59 FPS, indicating that the GPU is under significant load at the highest settings. The boost clock of 2550 MHz and the high shading unit count suggest that the GPU can handle demanding graphical workloads, but the frame rate drop from High to Ultra settings at 4K (76 FPS to 59 FPS) indicates that the Ultra preset is particularly demanding.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 259th out of 3,707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the combo in the top 7% of all tested configurations, which is a strong result given the large number of possible combinations. The rank reflects the overall performance of this specific pairing in the game, considering both CPU and GPU contributions. The data shows that there are 258 combos that perform better, which likely include newer or more expensive hardware, but the i7-12700KF and RTX 4080 SUPER combo is clearly positioned in the upper echelon of tested systems. The rank of 259 out of 3,707 indicates that the combo delivers a high level of performance, but it is not the absolute top-tier configuration. This could be due to the CPU being from the 12th generation rather than a newer generation, or the GPU being a SUPER variant rather than a higher-end model. The benchmark results show that the CPU and GPU are both in the 85th and 86th percentiles respectively when compared to all other components, so the combo is well-matched in terms of relative performance. The fact that the combo ranks in the top 7% suggests that the pairing is well-balanced and does not have a significant bottleneck from either component. However, the presence of 258 faster combos indicates that there is headroom for improvement, perhaps by pairing the RTX 4080 SUPER with a newer CPU or by using a more powerful GPU. The rank also implies that for Fivem, which can be CPU-intensive in multiplayer scenarios, the i7-12700KF is a capable partner for the RTX 4080 SUPER, but it may not extract the absolute maximum performance from the GPU in all situations.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the combo performs across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 331 FPS on Low settings, 261 FPS on Medium settings (with a min of 222 and max of 301), 209 FPS on High settings, and 162 FPS on Ultra settings. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the combo is heavily CPU-bound, as even at Low settings the frame rate is extremely high, suggesting that the GPU is not the limiting factor. The drop from Low to Ultra is 169 FPS, which is a 51% reduction, highlighting that the Ultra preset significantly increases the graphical load. Moving to 2560x1440, the FPS values are 218 on Low, 172 on Medium (with a min of 146 and max of 198), 138 on High, and 107 on Ultra. The transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a 34% decrease in FPS on Low settings (from 331 to 218), which is a substantial drop and indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the combo delivers 121 FPS on Low, 95 FPS on Medium (with a min of 81 and max of 110), 76 FPS on High, and 59 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra at 4K is 62 FPS, which is a 51% reduction, similar to the percentage drop seen at 1080p. This suggests that the scaling of settings has a consistent impact on performance regardless of resolution. The data also shows that the minimum FPS values are only provided for Medium settings, with 222 at 1080p, 146 at 1440p, and 81 at 4K. These minimums indicate that the frame pacing is generally stable, but the lower minimums at higher resolutions suggest that there are occasional dips in performance under load. Overall, the measured FPS shows that the combo is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the performance drops to levels that may require adjusting settings for a smoother experience.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important information about which component is the bottleneck in this combo. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 331 at 1080p to 218 at 1440p and then to 121 at 4K. This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 44% drop from 1440p to 4K. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 63%. Similarly, at Medium settings, the FPS drops from 261 at 1080p to 172 at 1440p and 95 at 4K, a 34% drop and then a 45% drop, respectively. At High settings, the FPS goes from 209 at 1080p to 138 at 1440p and 76 at 4K, with drops of 34% and 45%. At Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 162 at 1080p to 107 at 1440p and 59 at 4K, which is a 34% drop and then a 45% drop. The consistency of the percentage drops across all settings is striking. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistently around 34%, and the drop from 1440p to 4K is consistently around 45%. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor when moving to higher resolutions, as the frame rate scales inversely with the number of pixels rendered. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a smaller drop in FPS at higher resolutions, as the GPU would be waiting for the CPU to feed it data. The fact that the FPS drops by a consistent percentage regardless of settings suggests that the GPU is being fully utilized at all settings, and the CPU has enough headroom to keep up. The 4K resolution has 4 times the pixels of 1080p, and the measured FPS at 4K is roughly 37% of the FPS at 1080p across all settings, which is close to the theoretical expectation if the GPU were the sole bottleneck. This data strongly suggests that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the limiting component in this combo, and the i7-12700KF is able to provide sufficient data to the GPU even at lower resolutions where frame rates are very high.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem, and at what settings?

A: The highest average FPS is 331, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This indicates that the combo is capable of extremely high frame rates at lower graphical settings, likely benefiting from a CPU that can keep up with the GPU.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings compared to 1080p Low?

A: At 4K Ultra, the combo achieves an average of 59 FPS, while at 1080p Low it achieves 331 FPS. This is a 272 FPS difference, representing a significant drop in performance as resolution and settings are increased, confirming that the GPU is heavily stressed at 4K Ultra.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The FPS drops consistently by about 34% from 1080p to 1440p and 45% from 1440p to 4K across all settings, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU even at 1080p Low where FPS is 331.

Q: What is the average FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, and what are the min and max FPS?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 172, with a minimum of 146 and a maximum of 198. This shows that the combo can maintain a high frame rate at 1440p with medium graphical settings, with a relatively stable frame pacing.

Q: How does the combo's rank of 259 out of 3,707 compare to other tested combos?

A: The combo ranks in the top 7% of all tested combos, which is a strong performance. There are 258 combos that perform better, indicating that while this is a high-end configuration, there is still room for improvement with more powerful components.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between High and Ultra settings at 1920x1080?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS on High settings is 209, while on Ultra settings it is 162. This is a 47 FPS difference, showing that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding than High, likely due to increased graphical effects, shadows, and draw distances.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium settings preset appears to offer the best balance between visual quality and performance across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium yields an average of 261 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate of most high-end monitors)Skip. The minimum FPS of 222 at this setting ensures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate remains very high. Moving to 2560x1440, Medium produces an average of 172 FPS with a minimum of 146, which is still excellent for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, Medium delivers an average of 95 FPS with a minimum of 81, which is playable and provides a good experience on 4K displays with high refresh rates. In contrast, the High preset drops the average FPS to 209 at 1080p, 138 at 1440p, and 76 at 4K. While 138 FPS at 1440p is still good, the 4K performance of 76 FPS may not be ideal for players who prefer a stable 60 FPS or higher. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with average FPS of 162 at 1080p, 107 at 1440p, and 59 at 4K. The 4K Ultra setting is the only one that falls below 60 FPS, which may cause noticeable stuttering on some displays. The Low preset offers the highest frame rates, but the visual quality is likely to be significantly reduced, which may not be preferable for a game like Fivem where graphics can be an important part of the experience. Therefore, the Medium preset is recommended as it provides a high frame rate with a good balance of visual fidelity. For players with 1080p monitors, the High preset is also a viable option, as it still delivers over 200 FPS. For 4K users, the Medium preset is the recommended choice to maintain a smooth experience, while the High preset can be used if a 60 FPS target is acceptable. The Ultra preset is only advisable for players who prioritize maximum visual quality over frame rate and are willing to accept lower performance.