Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 127 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 59 | 76 | 94 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 110 | 134 | 170 |
| 1080p Full HD | 125 | 164 | 202 | 257 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Fivem, but the data shows a clear shift in system behavior depending on resolution. This combination sits at rank 502 out of 1792 tested combos, placing it in the upper third of all pairings. The benchmark results reveal a system that can crush 1080p, remain very strong at 1440p, and then hit a wall at 4K where the GPU becomes the primary constraint.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows how this combo scales as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces an average of 256.7 FPS, which drops to 164 FPS on High and 124.8 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, the Low setting yields 169.8 FPS, High produces 109.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 81.5 FPS. At 4K, the numbers compress significantly: Low averages 93.7 FPS, High drops to 58.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 48.8 FPS.
The scaling pattern tells a clear story about the limiting component. From 1080p Low to 1440p Low, the frame rate drops by roughly 34%. From 1440p Low to 4K Low, the drop is another 45%. This steep degradation at 4K indicates the RX 9070 XT is being pushed to its limits, while the i5-13400F has ample headroom at lower resolutions. The gap between Low and Ultra settings grows from 131.9 FPS at 1080p to just 44.9 FPS at 4K, which suggests that at higher resolutions the GPU workload dominates and settings changes have less relative impact.
The CPU's role becomes more apparent at 1080p, where the difference between Low and Medium is 55 FPS, and between Medium and High is 37.7 FPS. These large swings at low resolution indicate the processor can keep feeding frames faster than the GPU can render them. At 4K, the difference between Low and Medium shrinks to 17.9 FPS, and between High and Ultra to just 9.9 FPS, confirming the GPU is now the bottleneck.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo handle 1080p gaming at high refresh rates?
A: Yes. The data shows 164 FPS on High settings and 256.7 FPS on Low settings at 1920x1080, which comfortably exceeds 144Hz and even 240Hz monitor requirements on lower presets.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with Ultra settings?
A: The measured average is 81.5 FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings. This is playable for most titles, though not ideal for competitive play on high-refresh displays.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: At 4K, the system averages 58.7 FPS on High settings and 48.8 FPS on Ultra. This is borderline for smooth gameplay, and you would need to use Low settings (93.7 FPS) to get a consistently fluid experience.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H (25201), 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365), and 0.5% ahead of both the AMD EPYC 9474F (25103) and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (25099).
Q: What is the GPU's synthetic benchmark standing?
A: The RX 9070 XT has an average benchmark score of 39647 and ranks at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 575 (39703), 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39568), and 0.5-0.6% behind the Radeon Pro 575X and RX Vega 64.
Q: What does the combo rank indicate about overall performance?
A: This pairing ranks 502nd out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the top 28% of all configurations tested. The data suggests it is a strong mid-to-upper tier setup for this game.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the i5-13400F and RX 9070 XT achieves a rank of 502 out of 1792 combos in Fivem, putting it in the 72nd percentile of all tested pairings. This is a solid result, though not elite. The CPU's 82nd percentile standing among all CPUs and the GPU's identical 82nd percentile among all GPUs suggest a balanced pairing that performs slightly better than the average of its individual components.
The rank indicates that while this combo is well above the median, there are 501 other configurations that deliver higher average frame rates in Fivem. Most of those likely feature higher-tier CPUs or GPUs, given that the RX 9070 XT is already a high-end card. The i5-13400F's 10 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for the game's CPU demands, but the data suggests that in Fivem, the GPU is the more critical component for overall rank.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 256.7 FPS, Medium yields 201.7 FPS, High drops to 164 FPS, and Ultra settles at 124.8 FPS. These numbers show a linear progression where each settings tier costs roughly 35-40 FPS. The 1080p Low result is particularly notable, exceeding 250 FPS and indicating the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 169.8 FPS on Low, 134 FPS on Medium, 109.5 FPS on High, and 81.5 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a total drop of 88.3 FPS, or about 52%. This is a more pronounced penalty than at 1080p, where the drop from Low to Ultra was 131.9 FPS (51%), indicating the GPU is starting to feel the load.
At 3840x2160, the system averages 93.7 FPS on Low, 75.8 FPS on Medium, 58.7 FPS on High, and 48.8 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is the only sub-50 FPS measurement in the entire dataset. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 44.9 FPS, which is the smallest absolute difference across all resolutions. This compression of frame rates at 4K is a classic sign of GPU saturation.
Settings Recommendations
For competitive play at 1080p, the Low preset is the clear choice, delivering 256.7 FPS. This maximizes refresh rate potential and minimizes input latency. If you prefer visual fidelity while still maintaining high frame rates, High at 164 FPS is a reasonable compromise, though it costs 36% of the performance versus Low.
At 1440p, the Medium preset offers a balanced experience at 134 FPS. This keeps frame rates above 120 FPS while providing better visuals than Low. High at 109.5 FPS is also viable if you have a 100Hz or 120Hz monitor. Ultra at 81.5 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes in multiplayer.
For 4K, the data suggests sticking with Low settings (93.7 FPS) for a fluid experience. Medium at 75.8 FPS is acceptable, but High (58.7 FPS) and Ultra (48.8 FPS) risk dropping below comfortable thresholds during intense gameplay. If you have a VRR display, High might be tolerable, but the data indicates Low or Medium are the safest choices.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Its synthetic benchmarks show a strong single-thread score of 3004 in Cinebench R23 and a multicore score of 21279, which places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.
In Fivem, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS on Medium settings. The high boost clock and 16 threads allow the processor to keep up with the game's simulation and networking demands. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 and max-thread score of 7307 show consistent performance across all cores, which is important for a multiplayer game that may use multiple threads.
At 4K, the CPU's contribution diminishes as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The fact that 1080p Low yields 256.7 FPS while 4K Low yields 93.7 FPS illustrates that the RX 9070 XT is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The i5-13400F's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the Intel Core i7-13620H (0.1% behind) and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (0.5% ahead), indicating the CPU is competitive with mid-range mobile and desktop parts. Given the 65W TDP and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support, this CPU provides a solid foundation for the RX 9070 XT, but the data shows that in Fivem, the GPU dictates the upper limits of performance.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 93.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 75.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 58.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 48.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 169.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 134.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 109.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 81.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 256.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 201.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 164.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 124.8 |
Fivem with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RX 9070 XT + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-13400F + RX 9070 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.