Fivem

The Fivem dataset for the Intel Core i5-12400 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER contains measured average FPS across three resolutions and four presets. The highest measured average is 161.7 FPS at 1920x1080 Low, and the lowest is 28.7 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, and the complete combo ranks 1218th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz, a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, 18 MB of shared L3 cache, and a 65 W TDP. Its synthetic results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15935 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2249. The PassMark multi-thread score is 18747, and the PassMark single-thread score is 3456. The aggregate benchmark average is 19850, placing the chip at the 77th percentile among all CPUs.

In the nearest-rival table, that aggregate score positions the i5-12400 0.1% above the Core i7-9700, 0.2% below the Core i7-8700, 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX, and 0.4% above the Core i5-11600K. These deltas are small, meaning the CPU is effectively in the same performance tier as the older i7 parts in general benchmark terms.

Fivem is a Multiplayer title, so the CPU handles not only game logic but also the synchronization load that multiplayer sessions add. The 12 threads and strong single-thread result are consistent with the measured 1920x1080 Low result of 161.7 FPS, the fastest value in the dataset. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the same CPU and GPU pairing averages only 28.7 FPS. The large spread between these two rows cannot be explained by the CPU alone, because the CPU workload does not change as dramatically between resolution presets. Instead, the CPU is capable of feeding high frame rates at low resolution: 161.7 FPS at 1920x1080 Low, 124.7 at Medium, 101.3 at High, and 75.3 at Ultra. The bottleneck at higher resolutions belongs to the GPU side of the pairing, but the CPU’s 12-thread design and single-thread headroom set the upper frame-rate ceiling at lower settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark page ranks this Intel/NVIDIA pairing 1218th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. That rank places the combination in the lower portion of the field. This is notable because the component-level scores are more positive: the CPU is at the 77th percentile, and the GPU is at the 63rd percentile. In other words, the individual parts look above average in their separate benchmark pools, but the measured in-game combination does not reach a similarly high standing.

The measured FPS matrix explains this divergence. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo produces 161.7 FPS, a strong result. At 3840x2160 Ultra, it produces 28.7 FPS, a weak result. A rank computed across all measured rows is therefore lowered by the 3840x2160 performance. The GPU’s nearest rivals also show a competitive component: the RTX 2060 SUPER averages 19774, which is 0.3% above the GTX TITAN, 0.5% above the RTX 2070, 0.8% above the Quadro K5200, and 1.3% above the Tesla K40m. The CPU’s nearest rivals are similarly close, with the i5-12400’s 19850 average sitting almost exactly beside the Core i7-9700’s 19831 and Core i7-8700’s 19894. Component-level competitiveness does not automatically translate into a high in-game rank, and the 1218th rank reflects the full resolution and preset span of the Fivem results.

Resolution Scaling

The dataset covers 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. The average FPS values are:

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 161.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 124.7 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 101.3 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 75.3 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 106 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 82.4 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 66.2 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 52.9 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 58 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.6 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 39 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.7 |

Every preset line loses average FPS as resolution increases. At Low settings, the average falls from 161.7 at 1920x1080 to 106 at 2560x1440, then to 58 at 3840x2160. At High settings, the same progression is 101.3, 66.2, and 39. At Ultra, it falls from 75.3 to 52.9 to 28.7.

This consistent drop is a resolution-scaling pattern. Increasing resolution increases the GPU’s pixel workload more than the CPU’s workload, so the data indicates that the RTX 2060 SUPER becomes the limiting component as pixel count climbs. At 1920x1080 Low, the CPU is able to keep the pairing at 161.7 FPS. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the GPU cannot maintain that throughput, and the average drops to 28.7. The 3840x2160 Low result of 58 is still below the 1920x1080 Ultra result of 75.3, showing that resolution headroom is the decisive constraint in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest measured average frame rate for this combo?

A: The fastest measured average is 161.7 FPS at 1920x1080 Low. The next fastest values are 124.7 at 1920x1080 Medium and 106 at 2560x1440 Low.

Q: What is the slowest measured average frame rate?

A: The slowest measured average is 28.7 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra. The same resolution at High averages 39, at Medium 47.6, and at Low 58.

Q: How does the Core i5-12400 compare with its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU’s aggregate benchmark score is 19850. It is 0.1% above the Core i7-9700, 0.2% below the Core i7-8700, 0.4% below the Threadripper PRO 5995WX, and 0.4% above the Core i5-11600K.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare with its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GPU’s aggregate benchmark score is 19774. It is 0.3% above the GTX TITAN, 0.5% above the RTX 2070, 0.8% above the Quadro K5200, and 1.3% above the Tesla K40m.

Q: What frame rates are available at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, Low averages 106, Medium averages 82.4, High averages 66.2, and Ultra averages 52.9.

Q: What does the data show at 3840x2160?

A: At 3840x2160, Low averages 58, Medium averages 47.6, High averages 39, and Ultra averages 28.7. None of those rows matches or exceeds the 75.3 average produced at 1920x1080 Ultra.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is a Turing GPU built on a 12 nm process, with 10,800 million transistors and a 445 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1470 MHz, the boost clock is 1650 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz, rated at 14 Gbps effective. The GPU contains 2176 shading units, 136 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 34 RT cores, and 272 tensor cores. FP32 throughput is 7.181 TFLOPS. The card has a 175 W TDP and uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

The GPU’s aggregate benchmark score is 19774, placing it at the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score is 16462. In the nearest-rival table, it sits 0.3% above the GTX TITAN, 0.5% above the RTX 2070, 0.8% above the Quadro K5200, and 1.3% above the Tesla K40m. These are small margins, indicating that the GPU is in a familiar performance neighborhood rather than an outlier.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role is visible in the settings scaling at each resolution. At 1920x1080, Low averages 161.7, Medium 124.7, High 101.3, and Ultra 75.3. At 3840x2160, Low averages 58, Medium 47.6, High 39, and Ultra 28.7. The decline within each resolution as settings move from Low to Medium to High to Ultra shows that the GPU’s compute, memory bandwidth, and frame buffer are increasingly taxed by the game’s visual workload. The 8 GB frame buffer and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the relevant specifications in this dataset, and the measured frame rates are evidence that the GPU is the decisive factor at higher resolutions and higher presets.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows support a clear hierarchy. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the highest visual setting tested and still averages 75.3 FPS. That makes 1920x1080 Ultra the strongest quality-for-frame-rate result in the dataset. If a higher frame rate is preferred, High averages 101.3, Medium averages 124.7, and Low averages 161.7.

At 2560x1440, High averages 66.2, which is the highest quality preset at that resolution to remain above the 52.9 FPS Ultra result. Medium at 82.4 offers more frame-rate headroom, and Low reaches 106. At 3840x2160, the data is less supportive: Low averages 58, Medium 47.6, High 39, and Ultra 28.7. No 3840x2160 preset approaches the 1920x1080 Ultra result of 75.3. Based on the measured rows, the best recommendation is 1920x1080 Ultra for maximum quality, with 2560x1440 High as a viable alternative when a higher resolution is desired.