Fivem

Fivem’s measured performance with the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile shows a pattern typical of a heavily multiplayer-dependent title: the CPU carries a massive load, and frame rates scale more with resolution and settings than with raw GPU headroom. The data places this combo at rank 1993 out of 3707 tested combinations, a middling position that reflects the processor’s strong multi-threaded capacity but also the laptop GPU’s limits at higher resolutions. Below, the numbers are broken down to show exactly where this system thrives and where it falls short.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The 1920x1080 resolution produces the highest frame rates across all settings, with an average of 189 FPS at Low, 149 FPS at Medium, 119 FPS at High, and 92 FPS at Ultra. This resolution keeps the average above 90 FPS even at the most demanding preset, making it the clear choice for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the CPU benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an average benchmark score of 77740, which is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76513) and 1.6% higher than the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76492). It is 2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX (76212), but 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K (79097).

Q: Is the GPU powerful enough for 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rate ranges from 69 FPS at Low to 34 FPS at Ultra, with Medium at 54 FPS and High at 44 FPS. The data indicates that 4K is only playable at Low settings, as Medium drops to 54 FPS and High falls below 45 FPS.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile sits in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27435. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, scores 27425, a delta of 0%, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is only 0.5% higher at 27565.

Q: How does the combo’s rank compare to other tested systems?

A: This specific CPU-GPU pairing ranks 1993 out of 3707 total combinations tested in Fivem. This places it slightly below the median, suggesting that while the hardware is capable, many other pairings deliver better frame rates in this particular game.

Q: Does the CPU have a high single-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 2044 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2464 in Geekbench single-core. Its Passmark single-thread score is 4147, and it ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating strong per-core capability that benefits Fivem’s server-side processing.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows reveal a clear hierarchy: 1920x1080 with Medium settings offers the best balance, delivering 149 FPS average with minimums at 127 FPS and maximums at 171 FPS. This preset keeps the frame rate well above the refresh rate of most displays while maintaining visual fidelity. At 1440p, Medium settings yield 98 FPS average (min 83, max 113), which is still fluid but requires a high-refresh monitor to fully exploit. For 4K, the data suggests dropping to Low settings, as the 69 FPS average is the only preset that approaches playability; Medium falls to 54 FPS, and High drops to 44 FPS.

Ultra settings are not recommended at any resolution. At 1080p, Ultra averages 92 FPS, which is a 38% drop from Medium’s 149 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra averages 61 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 34 FPS, which is stutter-prone in a multiplayer environment. High settings are a middle ground, but the data shows that Medium provides a 25% higher average at 1080p (149 vs 119 FPS) and a 26% higher average at 1440p (98 vs 78 FPS) with minimal visual difference in most scenes. For competitive play, Low at 1080p hits 189 FPS, which maximizes responsiveness but sacrifices graphical detail.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. This configuration is heavily leveraged in Fivem, a game known for CPU-bound simulations and server-side scripting. The processor’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35314 and Geekbench multi-core score of 20992 indicate robust parallel performance, which helps maintain frame rate stability when many players are in close proximity. The single-core scores are equally important: Cinebench R23 single-core at 2044 and Geekbench single-core at 2464 show that the CPU can handle the game’s main thread efficiently, preventing bottlenecks that would otherwise cap the frame rate.

The 64 MB of shared L3 cache, split across the chiplet design, reduces memory latency for frequently accessed game data. This is critical in Fivem, where modded assets and player positions are constantly updated. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking among all processors suggests it is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the combo hits 189 FPS, which is a high ceiling that only the most powerful desktop CPUs could exceed. However, the CPU’s TDP of 55 W in a mobile form factor means sustained boost clocks may be limited, but the measured frame rates show that even with power constraints, the processor delivers sufficient throughput.

How This Combo Ranks

With a combo rank of 1993 out of 3707 tested combinations, this pairing sits just above the 46th percentile. This is a notable result given the hardware’s specs. The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all processors, and the GPU is in the 73rd percentile, yet the combined ranking in Fivem is mediocre. This discrepancy suggests that the game’s engine is sensitive to specific hardware configurations, potentially favoring CPUs with higher single-thread boost clocks or GPUs with larger memory bandwidth. The rank implies that many systems with lower-tier CPUs but desktop-class GPUs outperform this combo at higher resolutions, where the GPU becomes the bottleneck.

The nearest CPU rivals provide context: the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% behind the Intel Core i9-14900K in average benchmark score, but the i9-14900K is a desktop part with a higher TDP. In Fivem, the mobile RTX 4070’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth likely cap performance at 4K, dragging the overall rank down. At 1080p, the combo’s 189 FPS low-settings result would rank higher, but the aggregate rank includes all resolutions, penalizing the weaker 4K showing. This rank is not a reflection of poor hardware, but rather a mismatch between the CPU’s strength and the GPU’s limitations in a game that scales heavily with resolution.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile uses the AD106 chip on a 5 nm process, with 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical constraint in Fivem at high resolutions. The GPU’s boost clock of 1695 MHz and FP32 performance of 15.62 TFLOPS are modest for a 40-series part, but the data shows that the GPU is not the primary bottleneck until 4K. At 1080p, the GPU easily pushes 119 FPS at High and 92 FPS at Ultra, indicating headroom. At 1440p, High settings still deliver 78 FPS, which is playable. The turning point is 4K, where High settings drop to 44 FPS and Ultra to 34 FPS, a clear sign that the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are insufficient for the texture and geometry loads at that resolution.

The GPU’s benchmark scores reflect this: Passmark G3D at 19587 and Geekbench OpenCL at 109197 place it near the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (delta 0%) and slightly below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (delta -0.5%). This parity with desktop cards from a previous generation explains the frame rates: the RTX 4070 Mobile performs like a mid-range desktop GPU, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p but struggles at 4K. The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores are present but unused in Fivem, as the game’s engine does not leverage ray tracing or DLSS in the measured settings. The GPU’s 73rd percentile ranking is respectable, but in a CPU-bound game like Fivem, the GPU’s role is secondary until resolution increases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the data shows a progression from Low to Ultra: Low averages 189 FPS, Medium averages 149 FPS (min 127, max 171), High averages 119 FPS, and Ultra averages 92 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a 21% reduction, from Medium to High is a 20% reduction, and from High to Ultra is a 23% reduction, indicating that each preset tier has a consistent impact on performance. At 2560x1440, the averages are 124 FPS at Low, 98 FPS at Medium (min 83, max 113), 78 FPS at High, and 61 FPS at Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at the same setting is roughly 34% for Low, 34% for Medium, 34% for High, and 34% for Ultra, showing a uniform scaling factor. At 3840x2160, the averages fall to 69 FPS at Low, 54 FPS at Medium (min 46, max 63), 44 FPS at High, and 34 FPS at Ultra. The 4K results show a more severe drop from 1440p: Low falls 44%, Medium falls 45%, High falls 44%, and Ultra falls 44%, indicating that the GPU is hitting a hard limit.

The minimum frame rates recorded at Medium settings provide insight into stability: 127 FPS at 1080p, 83 FPS at 1440p, and 46 FPS at 4K. These minimums are 85%, 85%, and 85% of the averages respectively, suggesting that frame pacing is consistent without severe stutters. The maximum frame rates at Medium are 171 FPS at 1080p, 113 FPS at 1440p, and 63 FPS at 4K, which are 115%, 115%, and 117% of the averages, indicating that the system can burst above the average in less demanding scenes.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows that moving from 1080p to 1440p reduces average FPS by approximately 34% across all settings. For example, Low drops from 189 to 124 FPS (a 34% reduction), Medium from 149 to 98 FPS (34%), High from 119 to 78 FPS (34%), and Ultra from 92 to 61 FPS (34%). This consistent scaling suggests that the system is not yet GPU-limited at 1440p, as the frame rate drop is proportional to the pixel count increase (2.25x more pixels, but the FPS drops by only 34%, not 56%). This indicates that the CPU is still the primary constraint at 1440p, as the GPU has enough headroom to handle the extra pixels without a proportional performance hit.

Moving from 1440p to 4K, the average FPS drops by 44% across all settings. Low falls from 124 to 69 FPS (44%), Medium from 98 to 54 FPS (45%), High from 78 to 44 FPS (44%), and Ultra from 61 to 34 FPS (44%). The 4K resolution has 2.25x the pixels of 1440p, and the FPS drop is now closer to the pixel increase, indicating that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor. The RTX 4070 Mobile’s 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain the same efficiency at 4K, as the texture and shading demands exceed what the mobile GPU can deliver. The shift from a 34% drop to a 44% drop between resolution steps confirms that the bottleneck transitions from CPU-bound at 1080p/1440p to GPU-bound at 4K. At 1080p, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance caps the frame rate, while at 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute throughput are the limiting factors. This hybrid behavior explains the combo’s ranking: it excels at lower resolutions where the CPU dominates, but falls behind at 4K where the GPU’s mobile-class specifications cannot compete with desktop parts.