Fivem

# Fivem with AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT — Benchmark Analysis

FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU+GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 1681 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, with roughly 45% of tested systems performing better.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 53288, which is 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 7313P (53206) and 0.6% above the Intel Xeon 634 (52974). It trails the Intel Core i7-14700F by 0.6% (53620) and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3% (53469).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 6750 XT scores 26011 on average, which is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891), 0.6% ahead of the AMD FirePro W7100 (25856), and 0.7% ahead of the AMD FirePro D700 (25842). It leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1% (25740).

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo based on measured data?

A: At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable frame rates across all settings, with the Low preset hitting 200 FPS average and Ultra still maintaining 98 FPS. At 2560x1440, High and Medium presets remain smooth, but 3840x2160 Ultra drops to 36 FPS average, making 1080p the most versatile choice.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU hold the bottleneck in this game?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, frame rates scale significantly with settings (36 FPS Ultra to 73 FPS Low), indicating GPU-bound performance. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4238 in Passmark and 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 suggests it has ample headroom.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for these components?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has a launch MSRP of $549, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a launch MSRP of 549 USD.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 7 nm process node from TSMC, containing 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. Its base clock runs at 2150 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. Memory consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

This GPU configuration places it in the 71st percentile among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011. The 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines drive a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance reaches 13.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes increasingly apparent as resolution rises. At 1920x1080, the GPU easily pushes high frame rates — the Low preset reaches 200 FPS, and even Ultra maintains 98 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales proportionally: Low hits 132 FPS, while Ultra drops to 65 FPS. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with Ultra falling to 36 FPS and High at 46 FPS.

The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for Fivem at all tested resolutions and settings. The memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s supports the texture streaming typical of multiplayer environments. The GPU's 40 ray accelerators (RT cores) are present but not heavily utilized in this title, as Fivem does not demonstrate significant ray tracing demands in the measured data.

The RX 6750 XT's direct competitor, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, trails by 1.1% in average benchmark score (25740 vs 26011). This margin indicates the desktop RX 6750 XT holds a slight edge over that mobile part despite the NVIDIA card's higher tier positioning. In Fivem specifically, the GPU's mid-range placement (71st percentile) means it handles 1080p and 1440p well but struggles at 4K with higher presets.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X features 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process. It contains 13,140 million transistors across a dual-chip design with a die size of 2x 71 mm². Base clock is 4.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, drawing 170 W TDP on the AMD Socket AM5 platform.

Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU supports ECC memory and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes. Integrated Radeon Graphics are present, though Fivem performance relies on the discrete GPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 7900X demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 29300, while the single-core score of 2016.5 indicates excellent per-thread performance. Geekbench shows 19267 multicore and 2617 single-core. Passmark results include 51406 for multithread and 4238 for single-thread, with the CPU placing in the 91st percentile among all processors.

The 7900X's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700F, scores 53620 in average benchmark, a 0.6% edge over the AMD part. This close margin suggests the two CPUs are functionally equivalent in most workloads. The AMD EPYC 7313P (53206) trails by 0.2%, while the Intel Xeon 634 (52974) is 0.6% behind.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the limiting factor. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo achieves 200 FPS, demonstrating that the 7900X can feed the GPU adequately. The high boost clock of 5.60 GHz and strong single-thread performance (2016.5 in Cinebench R23) are critical for Fivem's multiplayer server-side processing and world simulation, which often rely on a few heavily loaded threads.

The 64 MB L3 cache helps maintain data locality for game assets and server synchronization data. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide headroom for background processes, streaming, and communication applications while gaming. The 170 W TDP indicates this CPU requires robust cooling, but the performance justifies the power envelope.

How This Combo Ranks

This configuration ranks 1681 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the 45th percentile of all tested systems. This position reflects a balanced pairing: the CPU is strong (91st percentile globally) while the GPU is mid-range (71st percentile), creating a system where the GPU limits overall gaming performance.

The ranking suggests that in Fivem, this combo outperforms roughly 55% of tested configurations. The CPU's high percentile ranking (91) versus the GPU's lower ranking (71) indicates that this pairing is CPU-heavy relative to typical gaming systems. Users seeking higher Fivem performance would benefit from a stronger GPU, while the CPU provides ample headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Compared to the GPU's nearest rival, the RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (1.1% lower GPU score), this combo's Fivem performance would be roughly similar to a system using that mobile GPU with a comparable CPU. The CPU's 0.6% deficit to the Core i7-14700F means that swapping the 7900X for that Intel chip would yield negligible Fivem performance differences.

The measured FPS data shows that this combo achieves playable frame rates (above 60 FPS average) at 1920x1080 across all settings and at 2560x1440 for Low, Medium, and High presets. At 3840x2160, only Low (73 FPS) and Medium (58 FPS) exceed the 60 FPS threshold. This positions the combo as a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming solution, with 4K limited to lower presets.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, delivering 158 FPS average with 134 FPS minimum and 182 FPS maximum. This provides a significant margin above the 60 FPS standard and maintains smooth gameplay even during intense multiplayer moments.

For 2560x1440, the High preset at 83 FPS average is recommended for most users, as it delivers solid performance while preserving visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 104 FPS is preferable for competitive play, offering 88 FPS minimum and 120 FPS maximum. The Low preset at 132 FPS is suitable for maximum frame rates, though visual quality suffers.

At 3840x2160, settings must be carefully managed. The Low preset at 73 FPS average is the only truly comfortable option for 4K gaming. Medium at 58 FPS average (49 FPS minimum) is borderline, potentially dipping below 60 FPS during heavy scenes. High at 46 FPS and Ultra at 36 FPS are not recommended for smooth gameplay.

The data indicates that this combo's sweet spot is 1440p with High settings or 1080p with Ultra settings (98 FPS). The Ultra preset at 1080p provides near-4K visual quality at a playable frame rate, making it an excellent choice for users prioritizing image quality over maximum frame rates. For esports-style play, 1080p Low at 200 FPS maximizes refresh rate utilization on high-Hz monitors.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K UHD), the combo delivers the following average frame rates: Low preset achieves 73 FPS, Medium reaches 58 FPS with a minimum of 49 FPS and maximum of 66 FPS, High drops to 46 FPS, and Ultra falls to 36 FPS. The 4K results show a clear progression where each settings tier costs roughly 12-15 FPS, indicating the GPU is the primary constraint at this resolution.

At 2560x1440 (QHD), performance improves substantially: Low preset hits 132 FPS, Medium achieves 104 FPS with 88 FPS minimum and 120 FPS maximum, High reaches 83 FPS, and Ultra maintains 65 FPS. The 1440p results demonstrate that this resolution is well-suited to the combo, with even Ultra settings maintaining playable frame rates above 60 FPS.

At 1920x1080 (Full HD), the combo excels: Low preset delivers 200 FPS, Medium reaches 158 FPS with 134 FPS minimum and 182 FPS maximum, High achieves 126 FPS, and Ultra maintains 98 FPS. All presets at 1080p exceed the 60 FPS threshold by significant margins, making this resolution the most flexible for any settings preference.

The frame rate scaling across resolutions follows a consistent pattern. At Low settings, going from 1080p to 1440p reduces performance by 34% (200 to 132 FPS), and from 1440p to 4K by an additional 45% (132 to 73 FPS). At Ultra settings, the same resolution transitions reduce performance by 34% (98 to 65 FPS) and 45% (65 to 36 FPS), respectively. This consistent scaling indicates that the GPU's rendering workload scales predictably with pixel count.

The Medium preset data includes minimum and maximum frame rates, providing insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p, the 134 FPS minimum versus 158 FPS average shows a 15% variance, while at 1440p, the 88 FPS minimum versus 104 FPS average shows a 15% variance as well. At 4K, the 49 FPS minimum versus 58 FPS average shows a 16% variance, suggesting consistent frame pacing across resolutions.

The measured data confirms that this combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p, where it provides smooth gameplay across all settings. The 4K experience is limited to Low or Medium presets for acceptable performance. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for the demands of Fivem at all tested configurations, with no evidence of VRAM-related stuttering in the available data.