Fivem

Fivem is a multiplayer modification platform for Grand Theft Auto V, and the measured performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 reflects a system built for extremely high frame rates. The data shows a combination that is heavily influenced by the CPU’s cache architecture and the GPU’s raw compute power, with results scaling predictably across resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, contextualizes the hardware’s role, and provides actionable settings recommendations based solely on the provided figures.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. Its cache layout is notable: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for Fivem, which is a modified version of an older game engine that often struggles with memory latency and benefits significantly from larger caches to keep frequently accessed data close to the cores.

The processor’s benchmark scores support its high-end positioning. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22,807 points in multi-core and 2,228 points in single-core. PassMark results show 41,318 for multi-thread and 4,704 for single-thread. Its average benchmark score is 58,386, which places it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (deltaPct 0.1%) and the Intel Core i9-14900 (deltaPct 0.5%), while slightly trailing the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 by 0.7% and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.2%. For a game like Fivem, the single-thread performance is often the bottleneck, and the 9850X3D’s high boost clock and massive L3 cache are designed to mitigate that.

The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 377 FPS, which is a pattern typical of CPU-bound scenarios where the GPU is not the limiting factor. The CPU’s ability to feed the GPU with data at these high frame rates is the primary driver of the results. The fact that the 9850X3D is a desktop processor with a 120 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier suggests headroom for overclocking, but the data presented does not include overclocked results. The processor’s memory support for DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth further contributes to its capability to handle the high data throughput required by Fivem’s multiplayer environments, which often involve many entities and scripts.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a flagship GPU based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, with a 5 nm process and a massive 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, with a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz. Its memory clock is 1750 MHz, running at 28 Gbps effective. The RTX 5090 is rated for a TDP of 575 W and requires a 1x 16-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 950 W.

In terms of raw compute, the RTX 5090 delivers 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. Its benchmark scores are equally impressive: 18,355 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 334,370 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 376,728 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 39,650, and the GPU compute score is 26,756. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 79,842, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (deltaPct 0.3%), the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB (deltaPct 0.6%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (deltaPct 1.1%), with the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X trailing by 1.4%.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes more prominent at higher resolutions. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 67, while at 4K Low it reaches 138 FPS. This scaling indicates that the GPU is heavily utilized at 4K, especially with higher settings that increase pixel shading and memory bandwidth demands. The 32 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for Fivem’s textures and assets, ensuring that there is no memory bottleneck even at 4K Ultra. The GPU’s high boost clock and massive bandwidth allow it to maintain playable frame rates at 4K, but the CPU still plays a role in ensuring the frame times remain consistent, as seen in the 4K Medium results with a min FPS of 92.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 377, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has an average benchmark score of 58,386, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The minimum FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 166, with an average of 196 and a maximum of 225.

Q: Does the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM cause any performance issues in Fivem?

A: No, the data shows no indication of VRAM limitations. The GPU’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory is ample for the game’s requirements, as the frame rates are consistent with compute-bound performance rather than memory capacity issues.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 53rd out of 3,005 tested combinations in Fivem.

Q: How much faster is 1080p Low compared to 4K Ultra?

A: The 1080p Low average FPS of 377 is significantly higher than the 4K Ultra average of 67, representing a difference of 310 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination ranks 53rd out of 3,005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the top 1.8% of all combinations, indicating that it is a very high-performing setup for this game. The rank is a reflection of the synergy between the CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache and the GPU’s raw power. While the CPU’s single-thread performance is strong, the GPU’s ability to render frames at high resolutions is what allows the combo to achieve such a high rank.

The rank is not higher due to the nature of Fivem, which is a multiplayer mod that often has server-side bottlenecks and is not optimized for the latest hardware. The data shows that the combo excels at lower resolutions and settings, where the CPU is the primary driver, but the GPU’s capabilities become more evident at 4K. The 67 FPS at 4K Ultra is still respectable, but it is clear that the game’s engine limits the potential of this hardware at the highest settings. Compared to other combos, the 53rd rank suggests that some configurations with slightly different CPU or GPU pairings may edge out this setup in specific scenarios, but overall, this is a top-tier combination for Fivem.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p Low, the system averages 377 FPS, which drops to 248 FPS at 1440p Low, and further to 138 FPS at 4K Low. This represents a 34% decrease from 1080p to 1440p, and a 44% decrease from 1440p to 4K. This pattern indicates that the CPU is the limiting factor at lower resolutions, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly, but the CPU cannot maintain the data throughput required for even higher frame rates.

At higher settings, the scaling is more pronounced. For Medium settings, the FPS drops from 297 at 1080p to 196 at 1440p (a 34% decrease), and then to 109 at 4K (a 44% decrease from 1440p). For High settings, the FPS drops from 238 at 1080p to 157 at 1440p (a 34% decrease), and then to 87 at 4K (a 45% decrease from 1440p). At Ultra settings, the FPS drops from 185 at 1080p to 122 at 1440p (a 34% decrease), and then to 67 at 4K (a 45% decrease from 1440p).

The consistent percentage decreases across settings suggest that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at 4K, especially with higher settings that increase pixel shading and texture filtering demands. The 4K Ultra result of 67 FPS is the lowest average, indicating that the RTX 5090 is being pushed to its limits at this resolution with maximum settings. However, the fact that the FPS does not drop below 60 at 4K Ultra suggests that the combo remains playable at the highest settings, albeit with a significant performance cost compared to lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 377 at Low to 185 at Ultra. The Medium setting yields an average of 297 FPS, with a minimum of 253 and a maximum of 342. The High setting averages 238 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU is capable of rendering frames faster than the CPU can feed it.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS ranges from 248 at Low to 122 at Ultra. The Medium setting averages 196 FPS, with a minimum of 166 and a maximum of 225. The High setting averages 157 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across all settings, suggesting a balanced scaling where both CPU and GPU are contributing to the performance. The minimum FPS at 1440p Medium of 166 is still well above playable thresholds, indicating smooth performance.

At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 138 at Low to 67 at Ultra. The Medium setting averages 109 FPS, with a minimum of 92 and a maximum of 125. The High setting averages 87 FPS. The 4K results show a clear GPU bottleneck, as the frame rates are significantly lower than at 1440p. The minimum FPS at 4K Medium of 92 is the lowest recorded minimum, but it is still within an acceptable range for most players. The data shows that the combo is capable of delivering playable frame rates at all resolutions and settings, but the best experience is found at lower resolutions where the CPU can keep up with the GPU.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user’s resolution and preference for frame rate vs. visual quality. At 1920x1080, the High setting with 238 FPS provides an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, as the frame rate is well above the refresh rate of most monitors. The Medium setting at 297 FPS is even smoother, but the visual difference is minimal, and the High setting offers better image quality without sacrificing playability. The Ultra setting at 185 FPS is also viable, but it provides diminishing returns in visual fidelity for a significant drop in FPS.

At 2560x1440, the High setting at 157 FPS is the best choice for a smooth experience, as it maintains frame rates above 144 Hz, which is the target for many high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium setting at 196 FPS is even faster, but the High setting offers a better visual experience with only a 20% reduction in FPS. The Ultra setting at 122 FPS is still playable, but it may not be ideal for competitive play where higher frame rates are preferred. The Low setting at 248 FPS is only recommended for users who prioritize maximum frame rate above all else.

At 3840x2160, the Medium setting at 109 FPS is the best recommendation, as it provides a playable frame rate with decent visual quality. The High setting at 87 FPS is also acceptable, but it is close to the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the minimum for a good experience. The Low setting at 138 FPS is the smoothest option at 4K, but it sacrifices visual fidelity. The Ultra setting at 67 FPS is the most demanding, and while it is technically playable, it may result in noticeable stuttering in fast-paced multiplayer scenarios. For a balanced experience, the Medium setting at 4K is the most sensible choice, as it offers a 92 FPS minimum and a 125 FPS maximum, ensuring consistent performance.