Fivem

# Fivem — AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers strong performance in Fivem, with measured frame rates ranging from 56.9 FPS at 4K Ultra to 304.7 FPS at 1080p Low. The CPU, which sits in the 90th percentile among all processors, pairs with a GPU in the 86th percentile to create a system that handles the multiplayer title smoothly across most settings and resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to run Fivem with this hardware?

A: At 2560x1440, the combination delivers 124.7 FPS on High settings and 96.3 FPS on Ultra, making it the sweet spot for high refresh rates without compromising visual quality. At 1920x1080, frame rates exceed 148 FPS even on Ultra, while 3840x2160 drops to 72.6 FPS on High and 56.9 FPS on Ultra.

Q: How much faster is the Ryzen 7 9800X3D compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 37780, which is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6353P at 37811 (0.1% higher) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 at 37831 (0.1% higher). It trails the Intel Core i9-13900HK by 0.6% and the Intel Core i5-13600KF by 0.7% in average score.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperform its closest GPU competitors?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER posts an average benchmark score of 48704, placing it 1.6% above the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (47915) and 2.0% above the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile (47743). It sits 0.7% behind the NVIDIA CMP 50HX (49071) and 2.1% behind the Intel Arc A550M (49737).

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 194.7 FPS. This is a substantial 46.4 FPS increase over the Ultra preset's 148.3 FPS at the same resolution.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested systems for Fivem?

A: This specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 188th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it within the top 10.5% of all configurations tested for this game.

Q: Is the 16 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth supports 4K gaming, as evidenced by the 72.6 FPS average at 3840x2160 on High settings. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.

How This Combo Ranks

The ranking position of 188 out of 1792 tested combinations places this setup in the 89.5th percentile of all configurations evaluated in Fivem. This is a strong result, though not a top-tier placement, indicating that while the hardware is capable, there are 187 other combinations that deliver higher frame rates in this specific title.

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's multi-threaded performance is notable, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34004 and a Geekbench multicore score of 18413. Its single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4800 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4430. These CPU strengths matter in Fivem, a multiplayer title where physics and entity updates can stress the processor.

The GPU's synthetic benchmarks show balanced capabilities: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569, Passmark G3D score of 31811, and Geekbench OpenCL score of 223091. The combination's rank reflects that Fivem's performance is influenced by both components, with the CPU's 96 MB shared L3 cache and 8-core/16-thread configuration providing the responsiveness needed for multiplayer interactions.

Compared to the nearest rival CPUs, the performance delta is minimal—within 0.7% either direction. This means the CPU choice provides no significant advantage or disadvantage over the Intel Core i5-13600KF or Intel Core i9-13900HK in this context. The GPU competition is similarly tight, with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sitting within 2.1% of its nearest rivals, suggesting that the overall combo rank is determined more by the interaction of these specific components with Fivem's engine than by raw benchmark dominance.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip, provides the visual processing for this combination. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for the texture-heavy environments typical of Fivem's open-world multiplayer scenarios.

The GPU's clock speeds are set at 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). These clocks, combined with 8448 shading units and 96 ROPs, translate into measured performance that scales predictably with resolution and settings. At 1920x1080, the GPU produces 304.7 FPS on Low settings, while at 3840x2160, it drops to 109.9 FPS on the same preset—a 64% reduction in frame rate that reflects the increased pixel workload.

The GPU's 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 689.0 GTexel/s texture rate handle Fivem's draw calls efficiently. The 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores provide headroom for ray-traced effects, though Fivem's benchmark data shows that standard rasterization performance is the primary driver of the measured results. The 285 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensure the card can sustain its boost clocks during extended gaming sessions.

The 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48704, indicates that this is a high-tier graphics card, though not the absolute fastest available. In Fivem specifically, the GPU's role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions, where the 16 GB memory capacity prevents potential VRAM limitations that could otherwise bottleneck performance.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy among the four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 304.7 FPS, which is 26.2% higher than Medium (241.5 FPS) and 56.5% higher than High (194.7 FPS). The Ultra preset at 148.3 FPS still offers smooth gameplay but represents a 51.3% drop from Low.

For the best experience balancing visual quality and performance, the High preset at 2560x1440 stands out. At 124.7 FPS, it provides a 29.4% improvement over Ultra (96.3 FPS) while maintaining a significantly better visual experience than Medium (160.9 FPS) or Low (201.2 FPS). The delta between Medium and High at this resolution is 36.2 FPS, which is noticeable but not as dramatic as the jump from High to Ultra (28.4 FPS difference).

At 3840x2160, the recommendation shifts to Medium settings. The 91 FPS average at Medium is 25.3% higher than High's 72.6 FPS and 59.9% higher than Ultra's 56.9 FPS. For 4K displays, Medium provides the best compromise, as the 56.9 FPS at Ultra falls below the 60 FPS threshold that most users consider the minimum for fluid gameplay.

The 1080p Ultra preset at 148.3 FPS is the highest visual quality that still maintains a high refresh rate, making it suitable for competitive play on 144Hz monitors. However, for most users, the 1440p High preset (124.7 FPS) offers the most balanced experience across all measured configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the frame rates scale as follows: Low produces 304.7 FPS, Medium produces 241.5 FPS, High produces 194.7 FPS, and Ultra produces 148.3 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent 20-25% reduction at each step, with the largest absolute drop occurring between Medium and High (46.8 FPS).

Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern continues but with steeper declines. Low achieves 201.2 FPS, Medium reaches 160.9 FPS, High hits 124.7 FPS, and Ultra drops to 96.3 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by 34-36% across all settings, which is consistent with the increase in pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the performance envelope tightens considerably. Low yields 109.9 FPS, Medium produces 91 FPS, High manages 72.6 FPS, and Ultra falls to 56.9 FPS. The jump from 1440p to 4K represents a 45-47% reduction in frame rates, again aligning with the pixel density increase.

The most notable efficiency point in the data is the 1440p Medium setting at 160.9 FPS, which offers 65.4% more performance than 4K Medium (91 FPS) while still providing a solid visual experience. The 1080p Low result of 304.7 FPS is the only measurement exceeding 300 FPS, making it the choice for esports-level refresh rates.

The spread between Low and Ultra widens with resolution: 156.4 FPS at 1080p, 104.9 FPS at 1440p, and 53 FPS at 4K. This indicates that the GPU's workload scales more steeply with settings at lower resolutions, while at higher resolutions, the pixel fill rate becomes a more dominant constraint. For users prioritizing consistent frame rates, the 1440p High preset (124.7 FPS) offers the best stability across the measured spectrum, with only the 4K Ultra preset (56.9 FPS) falling below the 60 FPS threshold.