Fivem

Fivem’s multiplayer workload responds strongly to both processor throughput and raw graphics bandwidth, and this pairing of an AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers a balanced profile that scales predictably across resolutions. The measured data shows a system capable of high refresh rates at 1080p and still playable frame rates at 4K, with the CPU’s eight-core design and the GPU’s large memory pool both playing distinct roles.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. With a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, it provides substantial single-thread headroom while maintaining enough parallel capacity for multiplayer servers that spawn many AI-driven entities. The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed game data close to the cores, which is relevant for Fivem’s often unpredictable, player-driven workloads.

In synthetic benchmarks, the chip scores 29302 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4136 in single-core, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.5% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13905H (0.6% lower). The Ryzen 7 7700’s multi-threaded performance, shown by a Passmark multi-thread score of 34470, is more than adequate to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions. In Fivem, where frame times can spike due to network sync and script execution, the processor’s 16 threads provide a buffer against stutter. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU is still the primary limiter for maximum frame rates, as the GPU has ample headroom to push well beyond 300 FPS on low settings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip, featuring 8448 shading units and 66 RT cores. Its memory configuration is a standout: 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is critical for Fivem at high resolutions, where texture streaming and draw distances are often memory-intensive. The GPU’s base clock is 2340 MHz with a boost of 2610 MHz, and its FP32 performance is rated at 44.10 TFLOPS.

In the Passmark G3D benchmark, the GPU scores 31811, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 50HX (0.7% higher) and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 (1.6% lower). The 16 GB frame buffer is particularly relevant for 4K Ultra settings, where the measured average FPS drops to 51.9, suggesting that memory capacity and bandwidth are being stressed. The GPU’s 672.3 GB/s bandwidth allows for high texture fidelity without significant paging, but the data shows that at 4K Ultra, the rendering load becomes the dominant constraint. The card’s 285 W TDP and triple-slot design indicate it is built for sustained performance, which is reflected in the consistent frame rates across the measured settings.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

Within the database of tested configurations, this specific combination of the Ryzen 7 7700 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks 185th out of 1792 combos for Fivem. This places it in the top 10.3% of all tested systems, a strong result that underscores the synergy between these two components. The rank reflects the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU at high frame rates, particularly at 1080p, where the combo achieves an average of 305.6 FPS on low settings. The data indicates that this pairing is not on the extreme modern of performance—those slots are reserved for higher-end CPUs like the Ryzen 9 series or more powerful GPUs—but it competes favorably with the majority of systems.

The ranking also suggests that this combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1440p, where it maintains an average of 200.6 FPS on low settings and 129.9 FPS on high. The 185th rank out of 1792 combos implies that there are 184 configurations that perform better, but many of those likely use more expensive components with marginal gains. The delta between this combo and the top performers is narrow in practical terms, as the FPS figures show. For a system in the 91st CPU percentile and 86th GPU percentile, the combined rank of 185 confirms balanced engineering rather than a single standout component.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 305.6 FPS on Low, 242.2 FPS on Medium, 193.8 FPS on High, and 151.6 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show a clear progression: dropping from Low to Ultra reduces performance by 154 FPS, or roughly 50%, indicating that the GPU is scaling with settings while the CPU maintains a high baseline. At 1080p, even Ultra settings exceed 150 FPS, making this combo ideal for competitive play where high refresh rates are paramount.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong: 200.6 FPS on Low, 160.7 FPS on Medium, 129.9 FPS on High, and 97 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 103.6 FPS, showing that the GPU is becoming a larger factor as pixel count increases. The 97 FPS at 1440p Ultra is still smooth for most displays, and the 129.9 FPS on High provides a good balance for quality and speed. At 3840x2160, the numbers drop further: 113.9 FPS on Low, 90.5 FPS on Medium, 67.3 FPS on High, and 51.9 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Low result is notable, as it shows the system can still push past 100 FPS even at this resolution when settings are minimized, but Ultra settings at 4K bring the frame rate below 60 FPS, which may require adjustments for demanding users.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Examining the scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a consistent pattern: the frame rate drops by roughly 63% across all settings. For instance, on Low settings, the FPS falls from 305.6 at 1080p to 113.9 at 4K, a reduction of 62.7%. On High settings, it falls from 193.8 to 67.3, a 65.3% drop. This uniform scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s workload does not increase proportionally with pixel count. The Ryzen 7 7700’s 16 threads are sufficient to keep up with the GPU’s rendering demands at 4K, but the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 672.3 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM are being pushed to their limits.

The data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 154 FPS; at 4K, it is 62 FPS. This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is approaching its ceiling, and the additional work required for Ultra settings has diminishing returns. The 51.9 FPS at 4K Ultra is a hard floor for this combo, indicating that users prioritizing 4K visual fidelity would need to accept lower frame rates or reduce settings. Conversely, the 305.6 FPS at 1080p Low demonstrates that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this scenario, as the GPU can render frames faster than the processor can feed them. The scaling behavior points to a system that is well-balanced for 1440p gaming, where the 200.6 FPS on Low and 97 FPS on Ultra represent a wide range of playability.