Fivem

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Fivem on this AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination reveals a clear pattern of resolution-driven performance scaling. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo delivers 289.9 FPS average. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 218.9 FPS, a reduction of 71 FPS, while 4K Low yields 122.2 FPS — roughly 42% of the 1080p Low figure. This steep decline as resolution increases points to the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor at higher pixel counts, whereas at 1080p the CPU is more likely constraining the frame rate ceiling.

The scaling behavior shifts noticeably across settings presets. In High settings, the drop from 1080p (209.2 FPS) to 1440p (137.2 FPS) is 72 FPS, and then to 4K (76.9 FPS) another 60.3 FPS. That 4K High result sits 132.3 FPS below the 1080p High number. For Ultra settings, the progression goes from 161.9 FPS at 1080p to 104.1 FPS at 1440p and finally 58.7 FPS at 4K. The relative drop from 1440p to 4K in Ultra is 45.4 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the High preset's 60.3 FPS drop, suggesting consistent GPU-bound behavior at higher resolutions regardless of preset.

What stands out is the gap between Low and Ultra at each resolution. At 1080p, the difference is 128 FPS (289.9 vs 161.9). At 1440p, it's 114.8 FPS (218.9 vs 104.1). At 4K, the spread narrows to 63.5 FPS (122.2 vs 58.7). The narrowing gap at 4K indicates that even the RTX 4080 SUPER's substantial compute resources are being saturated by the combination of high resolution and demanding settings, leaving less headroom for settings-based performance differentiation. The data implies that at 4K Ultra, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, while at 1080p Low, the Ryzen 5 5600's six cores may be holding back the GPU's full potential.

# CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 brings six cores and twelve threads to this Fivem workload, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The CPU's benchmark profile shows a single-thread score of 882 in 3dmark and 2584 in Cinebench R23 single-core, with multi-threaded Cinebench R23 reaching 18309. These numbers, combined with the 32 MB shared L3 cache, position the 5600 as a solid mid-range desktop processor that ranks in the 79th percentile against all CPUs.

In Fivem, which is a multiplayer title built on a modified game engine, the CPU's role is particularly visible at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 289.9 FPS, a figure that likely approaches the engine's frame rate ceiling or the CPU's ability to feed the GPU. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 5641 and max-thread score of 5659 suggest that the CPU's multi-threaded throughput is nearly identical to its 16-thread performance, meaning the extra threads beyond 16 provide minimal benefit — a relevant detail for a game that may not scale perfectly across all twelve threads.

Comparing the 5600 to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks, the Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635 average (0.6% ahead), the AMD EPYC 9554P scores 21899 (0.6% behind this CPU), and the AMD EPYC 9534 scores 21900 (0.6% behind). The Intel Core i7-11700F is 0.9% ahead at 21957. These deltas are within a percentage point, indicating that the 5600's performance class is tightly clustered. For Fivem specifically, the CPU's 12 threads and high boost clock appear sufficient to maintain high frame rates at 1080p, but the gap between 1080p and 4K results (167.7 FPS difference at Low settings) suggests the CPU is not the limiting factor once resolution increases.

# FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 289.9 at 1080p with Low settings. The lowest measured average is 58.7 at 4K with Ultra settings.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600 compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i7-11700F has an average benchmark score of 21957, which is 0.9% higher than the Ryzen 5 5600's 21765 average. The AMD EPYC 9554P and EPYC 9534 are both 0.6% behind the 5600.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, Low settings produce 218.9 FPS while Ultra produces 104.1 FPS, a difference of 114.8 FPS. The Medium preset sits between at 173.8 FPS.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 SUPER outperform its nearest rival in overall GPU benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER's average benchmark score is 53610, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (53489) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (53414). The RTX 5070 Ti trails by 2.9% at 52086.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations for Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 125th out of 1792 tested combinations, placing it in the top 7% of all combos tested for this game.

Q: What is the FPS cost of moving from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?

A: At Medium settings, 1080p delivers 261 FPS while 4K delivers 92.8 FPS, representing a loss of 168.2 FPS. This is the largest absolute drop across all settings presets.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured results show a clear settings hierarchy. Low settings average 289.9 FPS, Medium averages 261 FPS, High averages 209.2 FPS, and Ultra averages 161.9 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 28.9 FPS, while Medium to High costs 51.8 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 47.3 FPS. The 128 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p demonstrates that this resolution is where the CPU and GPU combination has the most headroom to express settings-based differences.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 218.9 FPS at Low, 173.8 FPS at Medium, 137.2 FPS at High, and 104.1 FPS at Ultra. The relative ordering remains consistent, but the absolute gaps compress. Low to Medium drops 45.1 FPS, Medium to High drops 36.6 FPS, and High to Ultra drops 33.1 FPS. The total Low-to-Ultra spread is 114.8 FPS, smaller than at 1080p but still substantial.

At 3840x2160, the data shows 122.2 FPS at Low, 92.8 FPS at Medium, 76.9 FPS at High, and 58.7 FPS at Ultra. The gaps narrow further: Low to Medium is 29.4 FPS, Medium to High is 15.9 FPS, and High to Ultra is 18.2 FPS. The 63.5 FPS total spread at 4K is roughly half of what it is at 1080p, reinforcing that the GPU is the dominant constraint at this resolution.

Across all resolutions, the Low preset consistently provides the highest frame rates, while Ultra provides the lowest. The Medium preset offers a middle ground, and High sits between Medium and Ultra in every case. No min or max FPS values are available in the measured data, so only average FPS can be reported.

# How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Fivem, this AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER pairing holds the 125th position out of 1792 total combos. That places it in the top 7% of all tested configurations, a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank reflects the combined performance of both components within this specific game's workload.

The CPU's 79th percentile standing among all CPUs and the GPU's 88th percentile among all GPUs provide context for this ranking. The GPU is the stronger component in this pairing, and the combo's 125th rank suggests that the CPU may be holding the overall result back slightly, given that the GPU alone sits at the 88th percentile. Had the CPU been a stronger model, the combo might rank higher, but the 5600's six-core, twelve-thread configuration still delivers competitive performance in Fivem.

The nearest CPU rivals, all within 0.9% in average benchmark scores, suggest that swapping the 5600 for an Intel Core i7-11700F or an AMD EPYC 9554P would produce similar results in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the GPU's 88th percentile position and its 0.2% lead over the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT indicate that the RTX 4080 SUPER is a meaningful contributor to this combo's strong rank.

# Settings Recommendations

For players targeting the highest possible frame rates, the Low preset at 1080p delivers 289.9 FPS, which is 128 FPS higher than Ultra at the same resolution. This preset is ideal for competitive play where frame rate matters more than visual fidelity. At 1440p, Low still provides 218.9 FPS, making it a viable option for high-refresh-rate monitors at that resolution.

For a balance between visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1440p offers 173.8 FPS, which is 45.1 FPS lower than Low but substantially higher than High's 137.2 FPS. At 4K, Medium produces 92.8 FPS, which is playable but noticeably below the 122.2 FPS of Low. The High preset at 1440p (137.2 FPS) and 4K (76.9 FPS) represents a middle path, though the 4K High result dips below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider the minimum for smooth gameplay.

The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding 58.7 FPS at 4K, 104.1 FPS at 1440p, and 161.9 FPS at 1080p. Given that the 4K Ultra result is the only measured configuration that falls below 60 FPS, players with 4K displays should prefer Low or Medium settings, while 1440p and 1080p users can comfortably use High or Ultra if they prioritize visual quality. The data suggests that Medium at 1440p provides the best overall experience, balancing the 173.8 FPS average with reasonable visual settings.

# GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing, with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus providing 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units are backed by 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores. Its boost clock of 2550 MHz and 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance place it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

In Fivem, the GPU's role becomes increasingly prominent as resolution rises. At 1080p Low, the 289.9 FPS result is likely limited by the CPU's ability to issue draw calls and process game logic, given that the GPU has ample headroom. But at 4K Ultra, the 58.7 FPS result reflects the GPU's struggle to maintain frame rates under heavy pixel and shading loads. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM capacity is more than sufficient for Fivem at any settings, as the game's asset complexity is unlikely to approach that limit.

The RTX 4080 SUPER's nearest rivals in benchmark scores are the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (0.2% behind), AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (0.4% behind), AMD Radeon RX 7700S (2.1% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (2.9% behind). The slim margin over the RX 6900 XT suggests that in GPU-bound scenarios, these cards would perform nearly identically. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 34245 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 246994 confirm its strong compute capabilities, which translate directly to the high frame rates observed at 1080p and 1440p in this game.