Fivem

# Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 delivers a playable Fivem experience that scales predictably with resolution and settings, landing at rank 3063 out of 3707 tested combos. At 1920x1080, this combo achieves a 64 FPS average on Ultra settings, which is the baseline for a smooth multiplayer session, while 4K Ultra drops to 23 FPS, making lower presets mandatory at higher resolutions. The data shows a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, but the 6-core, 12-thread CPU provides enough headroom to keep frame pacing consistent at lower resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 as the most effective resolution, with all settings presets delivering above 60 FPS except Ultra at 64 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low settings reach above 60 FPS (86 FPS), while High and Medium stay in the 54-68 FPS range.

Q: How does the GTX 1070's VRAM affect Fivem performance?

A: The GTX 1070 has 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 256.3 GB/s bandwidth. This capacity is sufficient for all tested settings at every resolution, as the benchmark data shows no memory-related stutters or failures, only expected FPS drops with increased load.

Q: Why does 4K Ultra perform so poorly (23 FPS) compared to 1080p Ultra (64 FPS)?

A: The 4K Ultra preset requires roughly 2.8x the pixel throughput of 1080p Ultra, and the GTX 1070's 6.463 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 107.7 GPixel/s pixel rate cannot sustain that workload, resulting in a 64% FPS reduction. The CPU's role is less significant here, as the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 4600G a bottleneck for the GTX 1070 in this game?

A: At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 131 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, plus 4.20 GHz boost clock, are sufficient for Fivem's multiplayer workload, as evidenced by the 103 FPS Medium result at 1080p.

Q: How does this combo compare to similar hardware in the database?

A: The combo ranks 3063 out of 3707 tested, placing it in the lower-mid tier. The CPU holds a 71st percentile vs all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 47th percentile, suggesting the GPU drags the overall ranking down more than the CPU.

Q: What is the most stable settings preset at 2560x1440?

A: Medium settings at 2560x1440 provide 68 FPS average with a 58-78 FPS range, offering the best balance between visual quality and frame consistency. High settings drop to 54 FPS, which is less stable for fast-paced multiplayer.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, 1920x1080 with High settings (82 FPS) is the sweet spot, delivering smooth gameplay without sacrificing visual fidelity. The data shows that Ultra at 1080p (64 FPS) is still playable but leaves little headroom for busy multiplayer scenes, whereas High maintains a 28% FPS buffer over the Ultra result. If visual quality is the priority, Medium at 1080p (103 FPS) provides a 61% FPS increase over Ultra while still looking substantially better than Low.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings (68 FPS) are the recommended preset, as they keep the average above 60 FPS while the 58 FPS minimum indicates occasional dips. High at 1440p (54 FPS) falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less suitable for competitive play. For 4K, only Low settings (48 FPS) approach playability, but the 30 FPS High result suggests that 4K should be avoided unless the player prioritizes screenshots over gameplay smoothness.

The data indicates that the Medium preset at each resolution offers the most consistent frame delivery, with the 1920x1080 Medium (103 FPS, 88-119 FPS range) and 2560x1440 Medium (68 FPS, 58-78 FPS range) showing the tightest min-max spreads relative to their averages. This suggests Medium settings are the most optimized for this hardware combination.

How This Combo Ranks

This combo occupies rank 3063 out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 17% of all tested systems. This ranking reflects the GTX 1070's age, as the GPU sits at the 47th percentile vs all GPUs, while the Ryzen 5 4600G performs much better at the 71st percentile vs all CPUs. The disparity between CPU and GPU percentiles indicates that the graphics card is the limiting factor in this pairing.

The CPU's nearest rivals show how close the 4600G is to other mid-range processors: it scores 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, 0.6% higher than the Intel Core 7 150U, but 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and 0.8% lower than the Intel Core i3-14100T. This tight clustering suggests that swapping the CPU for any of these alternatives would produce negligible FPS changes in Fivem.

For the GPU, the GTX 1070's nearest rivals are all workstation or professional cards, with the AMD FirePro W5000 scoring 0.2% higher, the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 0.5% higher, the NVIDIA Tesla M10 0.6% lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla C2070 0.7% lower. This indicates that the GTX 1070's raw gaming performance is roughly equivalent to these professional cards, but none of these alternatives would be recommended for Fivem due to driver optimization differences.

The rank 3063 out of 3707 is consistent with the hardware's age: the GTX 1070 launched in 2016, and the CPU in 2020. In a game like Fivem, which is heavily multiplayer and CPU-dependent in busy servers, the 4600G's strong single-thread performance (1919 in Cinebench R23 single-core) helps maintain playable frames, but the GPU's 47th percentile ranking caps overall performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers a clear progression across presets. Low settings achieve 131 FPS, Medium drops to 103 FPS (with a 88-119 FPS range), High reaches 82 FPS, and Ultra falls to 64 FPS. The 67 FPS difference between Low and Ultra represents a 51% performance penalty for maximum visual quality, which is substantial but expected for a 2016 GPU.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance curve steepens. Low settings produce 86 FPS, Medium drops to 68 FPS (58-78 FPS range), High reaches 54 FPS, and Ultra falls to 42 FPS. The 44 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is proportionally similar to 1080p, but the absolute numbers are lower, confirming that resolution scaling is the primary performance driver.

At 3840x2160, the results show a dramatic drop-off. Low settings yield 48 FPS, Medium drops to 38 FPS (32-43 FPS range), High falls to 30 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 23 FPS. The 25 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is the smallest absolute gap of any resolution, indicating that the GPU is so heavily loaded at 4K that even reducing settings has diminishing returns.

Comparing resolution scaling, the 1080p Low result (131 FPS) is 52% higher than the 1440p Low result (86 FPS), and the 1440p Low is 79% higher than the 4K Low result (48 FPS). This scaling pattern is consistent with the GTX 1070's 256.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 6.463 TFLOPS compute, which are insufficient for high-resolution gaming in modern multiplayer titles.

GPU Role

The GTX 1070's 8 GB of GDDR5 memory is never fully utilized in any of the measured scenarios, as Fivem's asset streaming at these settings does not exceed this capacity. The memory operates at 2002 MHz with 8 Gbps effective speed, providing 256.3 GB/s bandwidth across a 256-bit bus. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a limiting factor at 4K, where the 23 FPS Ultra result indicates the GPU cannot fetch and process pixels fast enough.

The GPU's clock speeds are 1506 MHz base and 1683 MHz boost, with a pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 202.0 GTexel/s. These specifications translate to the measured FPS deltas: the 4K Ultra result (23 FPS) requires 39.2 GPixel/s (23 FPS × 3840 × 2160), which is only 36% of the pixel rate, suggesting that the bottleneck is not purely pixel throughput but rather the combination of shader complexity and memory bandwidth.

The GPU's 1920 shading units and 120 TMUs are the key compute resources. At 1080p Ultra (64 FPS), the GPU processes 64 × 1920 × 1080 = 132.7 million pixels per second, which is well within its capabilities. However, at 4K Ultra (23 FPS), the shader load increases to 23 × 3840 × 2160 = 190.8 million pixels per second, approaching the 107.7 GPixel/s limit when accounting for overdraw and effects. The GPU's percentile rank of 47 vs all GPUs confirms it sits at the median of all tested graphics cards, explaining why it handles 1080p well but struggles at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 4600G provides 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its 8 MB of shared L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient for Fivem's multiplayer workloads, which typically involve many NPCs and player-triggered events. The CPU's 3DMark max threads score of 4889 and PassMark multithread score of 15992 indicate strong multi-threaded capability for handling server-side simulation.

The CPU's single-thread performance is more critical for Fivem's frame pacing. With a 3DMark single-thread score of 726 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1919, the 4600G ranks at the 71st percentile vs all CPUs. This strong single-thread showing enables the 131 FPS result at 1080p Low, where the GPU is not the limiting factor and the CPU must keep up with game logic and network updates.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and 7 nm process node contribute to efficient operation, but the data shows the CPU is not the bottleneck in this combo. At 1080p Ultra (64 FPS), the GPU is clearly limiting performance, as the CPU has demonstrated it can sustain 131 FPS at Low settings. The CPU's nearest rivals, which score within 0.8% of its average benchmark, would produce nearly identical FPS results in Fivem, confirming that processor choice is not the primary factor in this combo's ranking.

The 4600G's integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics are irrelevant in this configuration since the GTX 1070 handles all rendering, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 3 interface with 20 lanes provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 3.0 x16 connection. The CPU's 12 threads help with background tasks and streaming, which is beneficial in Fivem's busy multiplayer servers, but the 4K Ultra result (23 FPS) demonstrates that no amount of CPU headroom can compensate for the GPU's compute limitations at high resolutions.