Evolve

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER produces a fascinating dataset in Evolve, a 2015 FPS. The measured frames per second (FPS) reveal a system where the graphics card is the primary bottleneck, but the processor’s headroom ensures that frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings. This analysis examines the measured rows to understand the performance dynamics of this combination.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a classic GPU-bound scaling pattern. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo delivers 180 FPS. Moving to 1440p drops that to 117.1 FPS, a 34.9% reduction. The jump to 4K (2160p) further reduces the average to 65.6 FPS, which is a 43.9% decline from the 1440p figure. This steep decline as resolution increases is a direct indicator that the RTX 2070 SUPER’s rendering capabilities are the limiting factor, not the CPU.

The pattern holds across other settings. At High settings, the transition from 1080p (109.5 FPS) to 1440p (71.5 FPS) represents a 34.7% drop, nearly identical to the Low setting percentage. This consistency suggests that the GPU is operating at full capacity in all scenarios, and the resolution increase proportionally increases the pixel workload. At 4K High, the average falls to 42.8 FPS, which is a 40.1% drop from 1440p. The uniformity of these percentage losses across different quality presets is a strong signal that the core limitation is the fill rate and shading power of the GPU, not memory bandwidth or CPU instruction throughput.

The most demanding scenario, 4K Ultra, yields just 27 FPS. This is a stark contrast to the 180 FPS at 1080p Low. The data implies that the system has a massive performance range, but the upper end is firmly capped by the graphics card. The CPU, with its 20 cores and 20 threads, is never exposed as a bottleneck in this dataset; instead, the FPS deltas are almost entirely a function of the GPU’s pixel-pushing workload.

GPU Role

The RTX 2070 SUPER is the engine driving these results, and its specifications align with the observed behavior. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The benchmark results suggest that this memory configuration is sufficient for Evolve at the tested resolutions, as the FPS scaling does not show any sudden cliffs that would indicate VRAM capacity or bandwidth saturation.

The GPU’s clock speeds are listed as a base of 1605 MHz and a boost of 1770 MHz. The measured performance at 1080p Low (180 FPS) shows that the card can hit high frame rates when the workload is light. However, the boost clock is not the differentiator in this analysis; the sheer number of pixels at 4K overwhelms the 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs. The 64 ROPs are particularly relevant for 4K performance, as they handle the final pixel output. With only 64 ROPs, the card’s ability to fill 3840x2160 pixels is limited, which explains why High settings at 4K only achieve 42.8 FPS.

The GPU’s percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 65, and its average benchmark score is 22206. It sits near the NVIDIA RTX A400 (deltaPct -0.5) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (deltaPct 0.9). This places it in a mid-range tier. The data from Evolve suggests that this mid-range positioning translates to a card that is comfortable at 1080p and 1440p but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K with higher settings. The 4K Ultra result of 27 FPS is a clear indicator that the GPU is out of its depth in that configuration.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution. For a smooth 60 FPS experience, the data points to specific settings. At 1080p, even Ultra settings achieve 73.8 FPS, making this the best choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. At 1440p, High settings deliver 71.5 FPS, which is also above the 60 FPS threshold; Medium settings at 93.9 FPS offer a higher frame rate with a modest visual step down.

The 4K resolution is where compromises are necessary. The only 4K setting that exceeds 60 FPS is Low, which hits 65.6 FPS. Medium at 50.1 FPS and High at 42.8 FPS are playable but will not fully utilize a high refresh rate monitor. Ultra at 27 FPS is not recommended for competitive play. The data suggests that for 4K, the user must choose between frame rate and fidelity, with Low being the only preset that provides a fluid experience.

The "best experience" per the data is a trade-off between the 1440p High setting (71.5 FPS) and the 1080p Ultra setting (73.8 FPS). The 1440p High setting provides a higher resolution with a nearly identical frame rate, making it the superior choice for visual clarity. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates, 1080p Low at 180 FPS is the only option that approaches high-refresh-rate territory.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete dataset provides a clear matrix of performance. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 180 at Low to 73.8 at Ultra. The Medium preset lands at 135.1, and High at 109.5. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 59.0% drop in performance, indicating the significant cost of higher quality settings.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are lower across the board. Low produces 117.1 FPS, Medium 93.9, High 71.5, and Ultra 52.1. The delta between Low and Ultra is 55.5%, which is slightly less than at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU is beginning to hit a more consistent bottleneck where the settings have a slightly smaller relative impact.

At 3840x2160, the performance is heavily constrained. Low yields 65.6 FPS, Medium 50.1, High 42.8, and Ultra 27. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 58.8%, the largest relative drop in the dataset. This indicates that at 4K, the combination of high resolution and max settings creates an extreme load that disproportionately affects the Ultra preset. The 1440p Medium result of 93.9 FPS is interesting because it is higher than the 4K Low result of 65.6 FPS, highlighting how resolution is a more significant factor than settings.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Evolve at 4K smoothly?*

A: Only at Low settings, which achieves an average of 65.6 FPS. Medium (50.1 FPS) and High (42.8 FPS) are below 60 FPS, and Ultra (27 FPS) is not smooth.

Q: What is the best resolution for this system to maintain a 70+ FPS average?

A: The data shows that 1440p High (71.5 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (73.8 FPS) are the most demanding settings that still exceed 70 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 2070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: Its average benchmark score of 22206 is 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A400 (22307) and 0.9% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (22006).

Q: Is the CPU a limiting factor in any of the tested configurations?

A: No. The FPS scaling between resolutions is consistent, indicating the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU is not causing any frame drops.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low?

A: The average FPS drops from 180 at 1080p Low to 65.6 at 4K Low, a 63.6% reduction in performance.

Q: What is the frame rate at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 93.9, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a powerhouse that appears to have no influence on the measured FPS in this game. With 20 cores and 20 threads, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, its processing capability is far beyond what Evolve requires. The benchmark scores support this: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 50009 and a single-core score of 7060 place it in the 97th percentile versus all CPUs.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF (deltaPct -0.2) and the Intel Core i9-14900K (deltaPct -0.9). These scores are nearly identical, confirming that the 265K is at the top of the desktop heap. In this game, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU without stalling. The FPS data shows no signs of CPU limitations, such as inconsistent frame rates or poor scaling. The L3 cache of 30 MB (shared) and the 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth are more than sufficient for a 2015 title.

The data implies that the CPU is a future-proofing component in this pairing. While the GPU is the current bottleneck, the 265K provides ample headroom for a future GPU upgrade. The 20 threads ensure that any background tasks or newer, more CPU-intensive games will not cause a bottleneck. For Evolve, the CPU is simply a non-factor, allowing the GPU’s performance to be the sole determinant of the frame rate.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ranks 1059 out of 1695 combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking. This rank is a direct consequence of the GPU’s mid-range standing (65th percentile) outweighing the CPU’s high-end standing (97th percentile).

The rank of 1059 suggests that while the CPU is excellent, the overall gaming performance is held back by the graphics card. The combo rank is a holistic measure, and the data indicates that many other combinations with faster GPUs would rank higher, regardless of their CPU. The GPU’s nearest rival data, which shows it closely matched with cards like the RTX A400 and GTX TITAN Z, reinforces that this combo’s gaming performance is firmly in the mid-range tier.

This ranking is not a judgment on the system’s capability, but rather a reflection of the balance of its components. For a game like Evolve, the 1080p and 1440p results are strong, but the 4K results drag the overall ranking down. The data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it can deliver a high-quality experience, rather than for 4K or extreme high-refresh-rate scenarios.