Evolve
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 103 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 50 | 64 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 61 | 88 | 112 | 144 |
| 1080p Full HD | 91 | 131 | 167 | 215 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Evolve with Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + AMD Radeon RX 7900M, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900M delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Evolve, though the game’s engine imposes a clear ceiling on ultra settings. At 1080p, the combo is exceptionally fast, but the data shows that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution climbs. This analysis breaks down the measured frame rates, component roles, and optimal settings based strictly on the provided benchmark data.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for the highest average frame rate?
A: The highest measured average frame rate is 215 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. For a more balanced visual experience, the 1440p Medium preset yields 112 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 35 FPS. This is the lowest measured performance point in the dataset, indicating that the Ultra preset at 4K is not suitable for smooth gameplay.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor at 1080p?
A: The data suggests the CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p. The frame rate jumps significantly from Low (215 FPS) to Medium (167 FPS) to High (131 FPS), but the scaling is not linear, and the CPU’s performance ceiling becomes apparent at these high frame rates.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded for this combo?
A: The only recorded minimum frame rates are for the Medium preset: 142 FPS at 1080p, 95 FPS at 1440p, and 54 FPS at 4K. No minimums were provided for the Low, High, or Ultra presets.
Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has an average benchmark score of 63173. This is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-13790F, which scores 63080, and 0.7% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, which scores 62738.
Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900M features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data reveals a clear trade-off between visual fidelity and frame rate. For the best experience, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium delivers a 167 FPS average with a minimum of 142 FPS, ensuring smooth, tear-free gameplay on high-refresh monitors. Moving to 1440p Medium yields 112 FPS with a 95 FPS minimum, which remains fluid and is the highest quality setting that keeps the average above 100 FPS.
The High preset is viable but less optimal. At 1080p, it produces 131 FPS, which is still excellent, but the 27% drop from Medium is substantial. At 1440p, High drops to 88 FPS, which is playable but begins to approach the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, and the data indicates it is not recommended for serious play. At 1440p, Ultra yields 61 FPS, which is borderline, and at 4K it falls to 35 FPS, which is not smooth.
For competitive play, the Low preset at 1080p offers the absolute maximum frame rate of 215 FPS. However, the jump from Low to Medium (167 FPS) is only a 22% reduction, while the visual quality improvement is significant. Therefore, the Medium preset at 1080p provides the best balance of high frame rates and visual quality, while 1440p Medium offers a sharper image with still-strong performance. The data suggests avoiding Ultra except for screenshots or single-player scenarios where frame rate is not critical.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7900M is a high-end mobile GPU with a 94th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its architecture is RDNA 3.0, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 529 mm² containing 57,700 million transistors. The GPU’s base clock is 1825 MHz, with a boost clock of 2090 MHz. The memory subsystem is substantial, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, which provides a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.
In Evolve, the GPU’s role becomes increasingly critical as resolution and settings increase. The frame rate deltas between settings at 4K are stark: Low (82 FPS) to Medium (64 FPS) to High (50 FPS) to Ultra (35 FPS). This shows that the GPU’s compute and memory bandwidth are directly taxed by the higher graphical loads. The 16 GB VRAM buffer is more than sufficient for this game, as the 2015 release date suggests its texture requirements are modest by modern standards. The GPU’s 4608 shading units and 192 ROPs are capable of handling the pixel workload at 4K, but the frame rates indicate that the shading complexity of the Ultra preset is too heavy for a smooth experience.
The GPU’s benchmark scores corroborate its strong standing: it achieves 4201 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 129499 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 158760 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro VII, scores 0.4% lower, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 scores 4.3% higher on average. This positioning confirms the RX 7900M is a top-tier mobile solution, yet Evolve’s ultra settings still overwhelm it at 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and the AMD Radeon RX 7900M ranks 1191 out of 2872 tested combos for Evolve. This places it in the top 41.5% of all configurations, which is a solid mid-to-high tier position. Given the CPU’s 93rd percentile and the GPU’s 94th percentile, one might expect a higher rank, but the game’s specific engine behavior and the sheer number of combos tested likely include more specialized or newer hardware.
The rank suggests that while this combo is powerful, it is not the absolute best for Evolve. The data implies that other combinations of higher-clocked desktop components or newer generation parts may achieve better frame rates. However, for a mobile platform, this rank is respectable. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G (0.2% lower average score) and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (0.7% lower), are close in synthetic benchmarks, but their in-game performance could vary. The GPU’s position relative to rivals like the AMD Radeon Pro VII (0.4% lower) and the NVIDIA RTX A4500 (6.3% lower) further contextualizes the hardware’s capability, though the game’s actual frame rates are the definitive measure.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU is designed for high multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40642 and Passmark multi-thread score of 47985.
In Evolve, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU and handle game logic. At 1080p, the CPU’s influence is most apparent. The frame rates at Low (215 FPS) and Medium (167 FPS) are high enough that the CPU’s single-thread performance becomes the bottleneck. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5737 and Passmark single-thread score of 4500 indicate strong per-core performance, which is essential for this scenario. The CPU’s 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache are likely more than enough for the game’s threading model, which is typical of a 2015 FPS title.
The CPU’s performance is further validated by its average benchmark score of 63173, which places it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13790F and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The data suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor until the GPU is fully utilized at higher resolutions. At 4K, the frame rates drop significantly more than at 1080p when moving from Low to Ultra, which confirms that the GPU’s workload increases disproportionately, shifting the bottleneck away from the CPU.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates provide a comprehensive view of performance across resolutions and settings.
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance. The Low preset averages 215 FPS, while Medium drops to 167 FPS with a minimum of 142 FPS and a maximum of 192 FPS. High averages 131 FPS, and Ultra averages 91 FPS. This shows a consistent scaling where each step up in quality reduces the average by roughly 20-30 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the GPU’s growing load. Low averages 144 FPS, Medium averages 112 FPS with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 129 FPS, High averages 88 FPS, and Ultra averages 61 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, with the Low preset losing 33% of its performance.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low averages 82 FPS, Medium averages 64 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS, High averages 50 FPS, and Ultra averages 35 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it the worst measured scenario.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the shifting bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 215 at 1080p to 144 at 1440p (a 33% reduction) and then to 82 at 4K (a 43% reduction from 1440p). This scaling is steeper than the pixel count increase suggests, indicating that the GPU is becoming saturated even at Low settings.
At Medium settings, the drop is 167 to 112 to 64, representing a 33% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 43% drop from 1440p to 4K. The pattern is consistent, with the GPU’s workload growing faster than the resolution. At High settings, the frame rates are 131, 88, and 50, showing a 33% drop to 1440p and a 43% drop to 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most severe scaling: 91, 61, and 35, with a 33% drop to 1440p and a 43% drop to 4K.
This consistent scaling pattern across all settings highlights that the RX 7900M’s performance is directly tied to pixel throughput. The CPU’s influence diminishes as resolution increases, as the frame rates become lower and the GPU’s rendering time dominates. The data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where the high frame rates are achievable, while 4K is reserved for less demanding settings or older titles.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + AMD Radeon RX 7900M in Evolve
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 82.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 144.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 112.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 88.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 61.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 215.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 167.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 131.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 91.0 |
Evolve with iUltra 7 265HX + Other GPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Evolve with RX 7900M + Other CPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265HX + RX 7900M
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.