Evolve
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 142 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 56 | 80 | 105 | 136 |
| 1440p QHD | 103 | 144 | 170 | 187 |
| 1080p Full HD | 147 | 178 | 190 | 211 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Evolve with Intel Core i5-9400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
Evolve, the 2015 FPS, presents an interesting bottleneck profile when paired with the Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The data shows a system where the GPU is the dominant force at higher settings, but the CPU begins to assert its influence as resolution drops. This combination delivers a highly playable experience across all tested configurations, though the performance scaling reveals a clear hierarchy of component limitations.
Resolution Scaling
The most telling data point is the performance delta between 1080p and 4K. At Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 147.2 FPS at 1920x1080 to 56.1 FPS at 3840x2160, a significant reduction that indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor at the highest visual fidelity. This 4K Ultra result sits at just 38% of the 1080p Ultra performance, a classic sign of pixel-pushing workloads overwhelming the graphics card.
However, the scaling pattern shifts dramatically when settings are lowered. At Low settings, the frame rate only falls from 211.2 FPS at 1080p to 135.7 FPS at 4K, representing a much smaller relative drop of 36%. This suggests that at lower settings, the CPU becomes a more significant constraint, especially at 1080p where the GPU has less work to do. The 211.2 FPS figure at 1080p Low appears to be approaching the ceiling of what the i5-9400 can feed to the GPU, as the gap between 1080p and 1440p at Low settings is a much narrower 24.3 FPS (186.9 vs 211.2) compared to the 41.2 FPS gap at High settings (177.6 vs 144.3).
The Medium settings provide the clearest view of this scaling behavior. Performance ranges from 190.4 FPS at 1080p to 105.1 FPS at 4K, a 45% reduction. This mid-tier configuration shows balanced scaling, where neither component completely dominates the other. The data indicates that at 4K, the GPU is consistently the limiting factor across all settings, as even the jump from Low to Medium costs 30.6 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs 24.9 FPS, and High to Ultra costs another 24.1 FPS.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-9400 provides six cores and six threads, running at a base clock of 2.90 GHz with a boost up to 4.10 GHz. This Coffee Lake architecture processor, built on Intel's 14 nm process, features a 9 MB shared L3 cache. In the context of this benchmark, the CPU's influence is most visible at 1080p resolution where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, a range that typically demands strong single-threaded performance.
Benchmark results place this CPU in the 50th percentile among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 2305. Its nearest rivals in synthetic testing include the Intel Core i3-10305 (2300, 0.2% faster) and the Intel Xeon E-2134 (2295, 0.4% faster), while the Intel Core i7-8809G (2319) is only 0.6% ahead. This clustering suggests the i5-9400 sits in a competitive mid-range performance tier.
The 1080p Low result of 211.2 FPS is the strongest evidence of CPU limitation. The fact that the 1440p Low result (186.9 FPS) is not proportionally lower than the 1080p figure suggests that the processor's ability to issue draw calls and manage game logic is capping performance before the GPU becomes fully saturated. At 4K Low, the 135.7 FPS result shows the GPU finally taking over as the bottleneck, as the increased pixel workload gives the CPU more breathing room relative to frame time.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is a formidable graphics solution with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, contains 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz with a boost of 2617 MHz, and the memory runs at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective).
This GPU sits in the 89th percentile among all tested graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 59188. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A570M (58239, 1.6% slower) and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X (57661, 2.6% slower), while the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60326) is 1.9% faster. The RTX 5080's 10752 shading units and 112 ROPs provide substantial raw compute capability.
The GPU's dominance is most apparent at 4K Ultra, where it delivers 56.1 FPS. This is the only configuration that drops below 80 FPS, indicating that Evolve's Ultra settings at 4K present a genuine challenge even for this high-end card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 and PassMark G3D score of 36565 corroborate the GPU's strong positioning, though the PassMark DirectX 11 score of 324 suggests that this modern architecture may not fully optimize for older titles like Evolve.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of the i5-9400 and RTX 5080 ranks 277th out of 1695 tested combos in Evolve, placing it in the top 16.4% of all systems evaluated. This ranking reflects a capable pairing that delivers high frame rates across the board, though the CPU's mid-range positioning prevents it from fully exploiting the GPU's potential at lower resolutions.
The rank is somewhat surprising given the GPU's 89th percentile standing, but it makes sense when considering the CPU's 50th percentile placement. The data suggests that in Evolve, the i5-9400 acts as a moderating influence on the RTX 5080's performance, particularly in CPU-bound scenarios at 1080p. At 4K, where the GPU takes over, the combo performs closer to what the graphics card alone would suggest.
Compared to the synthetic benchmark results, this in-game ranking shows the importance of real-world testing. While the GPU outperforms its nearest rivals by margins of 1.6% to 2.6% in average benchmark scores, the in-game ranking demonstrates that these synthetic deltas do not always translate directly to frame rate advantages in specific titles.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce 211.2 FPS, Medium settings yield 190.4 FPS, High settings achieve 177.6 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 147.2 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 20.8 FPS, while the step from Medium to High costs 12.8 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 30.4 FPS. The largest drop occurs between High and Ultra, indicating a significant visual fidelity jump that demands proportionally more GPU resources.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong. Low settings achieve 186.9 FPS, Medium settings hit 169.5 FPS, High settings reach 144.3 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 103 FPS. The differential between Low and Ultra is 83.9 FPS, representing a 45% reduction. The scaling from Medium to High (25.2 FPS drop) is more pronounced than from Low to Medium (17.4 FPS drop), suggesting that High settings introduce more demanding effects.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's workload becomes apparent. Low settings deliver 135.7 FPS, Medium settings produce 105.1 FPS, High settings achieve 80.2 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 56.1 FPS. The Ultra result is the only sub-60 FPS figure in the entire dataset, making it the sole configuration where the experience could be considered less than smooth for competitive play. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra costs 46.9 FPS, the largest resolution-based drop in the dataset.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Evolve?
A: The data shows that 2560x1440 offers the best balance, with High settings achieving 144.3 FPS and Ultra maintaining 103 FPS. This resolution avoids the CPU bottleneck seen at 1080p while keeping frame rates well above 100 FPS at most settings.
Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra in Evolve?
A: Yes, but with caveats. The 4K Ultra result of 56.1 FPS is playable but falls below the 60 FPS threshold that many players prefer. Dropping to 4K High raises the average to 80.2 FPS, which is a more comfortable margin.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this setup?
A: It depends on settings and resolution. At 1080p Low, the CPU is the primary limiter, capping performance at 211.2 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, producing 56.1 FPS. The transition point appears to be around 1440p Medium, where both components share the workload.
Q: How does this combo compare to other tested systems?
A: This combination ranks 277th out of 1695 tested combos in Evolve, placing it in the top 16.4% of all systems. This is a strong showing, though the CPU's 50th percentile synthetic ranking suggests there is headroom for improvement with a faster processor.
Q: What settings provide the smoothest experience at 4K?
A: Medium settings at 4K deliver 105.1 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. High settings at 80.2 FPS also provide a smooth experience. Ultra at 56.1 FPS is the only configuration that dips below 60 FPS.
Q: Does the game benefit more from CPU or GPU upgrades?
A: Based on the scaling data, a GPU upgrade would provide the largest benefit at 4K, while a CPU upgrade would help unlock higher frame rates at 1080p. The RTX 5080 is already in the 89th percentile, so the i5-9400's 50th percentile ranking makes it the more likely upgrade target for this specific game.
Settings Recommendations
For the best overall experience, the data points to 1440p High as the sweet spot. This configuration delivers 144.3 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most high-refresh monitors while maintaining visual quality that significantly exceeds Low settings. The 169.5 FPS at 1440p Medium is an excellent alternative for players who prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity.
At 4K, High settings at 80.2 FPS provide the best balance between image quality and smoothness. The jump from Medium (105.1 FPS) to High (80.2 FPS) costs 24.9 FPS but represents a more substantial visual upgrade than the smaller step from Low to Medium. Ultra at 56.1 FPS should be avoided unless the user has a 60 Hz monitor and values maximum visual quality over frame rate stability.
For competitive play at 1080p, Medium settings at 190.4 FPS offer a compelling option. The difference between Low (211.2 FPS) and Medium (190.4 FPS) is 20.8 FPS, but Medium likely provides noticeably better visual clarity for spotting enemies. The 147.2 FPS at 1080p Ultra remains viable, though the 43.2 FPS gap between Medium and Ultra suggests diminishing returns on visual investment.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-9400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-9400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Evolve
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 135.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 105.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 80.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 56.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 186.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 169.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 144.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 103.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 211.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 190.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 177.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 147.2 |
Evolve with ii5-9400 + Other GPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with ii5-9400 + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.