Evolve

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti presents a stark imbalance in the 2015 FPS title Evolve. The 9700F is a modern 8-core Zen 5 part, while the GTX 1050 Ti is an end-of-life Pascal GPU from 2016. The benchmark data confirms this pairing produces a system where the graphics card is the overwhelming bottleneck. The measured FPS figures show that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor; instead, the GPU's 4 GB of VRAM and modest compute throughput cap performance across all tested resolutions and settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data to understand how this combination behaves in Evolve.

Resolution Scaling

The most telling data point for this combo is the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K. At 1080p with Low settings, the combination produces an average of 62 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops the average to 42 FPS, and at 4K Low, the average falls to 24 FPS. This is a severe reduction, with the 4K figure representing a 61% drop from the 1080p score. This steep decline indicates that the rendering pipeline is almost entirely dependent on the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth.

The pattern holds across all settings. At Medium, the 1080p average is 48 FPS, dropping to 32 FPS at 1440p and 18 FPS at 4K. Similarly, High settings see a drop from 38 FPS at 1080p to 25 FPS at 1440p and just 14 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, starting at 26 FPS at 1080p and collapsing to 17 FPS at 1440p and 10 FPS at 4K. These numbers show that as resolution increases, the pixel count demands more from the GPU's 112.1 GB/s memory bandwidth and 2.138 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, and the GTX 1050 Ti simply cannot keep up.

Because the frame rate scales so heavily with resolution, the data suggests that the Ryzen 7 9700F is not the limiting component. The CPU has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz and 8 cores, which is more than sufficient for a game from 2015. The bottleneck is clearly the GPU, as evidenced by the fact that even at 4K with the Low preset, the system only manages 24 FPS, a score that is below the 30 FPS threshold generally considered playable. The GPU is being saturated at every resolution, and the CPU is left waiting on the graphics pipeline to complete its work. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is less severe than from 1080p to 1440p, which is typical of a GPU-bound scenario; the GPU is already at its limits, and the additional pixel load yields diminishing returns in terms of frame rate degradation.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured performance in Evolve places this combination at rank 2833 out of 2872 tested combos. This puts it in the bottom 1.4% of all tested systems for this game. This is a very poor showing, and it directly reflects the GPU's capabilities. The GTX 1050 Ti has an average benchmark score of 4193 and sits at the 25th percentile of all GPUs. This is a low-end part, and its performance in Evolve is consistent with that designation.

The combo rank is not a reflection of the CPU. The Ryzen 7 9700F is a high-end processor, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 69996. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, which scores 69875 (0.2% higher), and the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which scores 70163 (0.2% lower). The CPU is clearly capable of far more than this GPU can deliver. The data shows a massive disconnect between the CPU's potential and the combined system's actual performance.

The low combo rank is entirely attributable to the graphics card. The GTX 1050 Ti's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon R5 M330 (0.6% lower) and the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M (1% lower), are all extremely low-performance parts. The fact that the GTX 1050 Ti is competing with these mobile and workstation chips underscores its limited gaming capability. In Evolve, a 2015 title, this GPU is the anchor that drags the entire system down to the bottom of the rankings. The CPU has the raw power to handle the game's physics and AI, but the GPU cannot render the frames fast enough to use that power.

Settings Recommendations

Given the measured data, the only viable path to a playable experience is to use the Low preset at 1080p. This is the only configuration that achieves an average frame rate above 60 FPS, hitting 62 FPS. This should provide a smooth experience for a 60 Hz display. The Medium preset at 1080p is a secondary option, offering an average of 48 FPS, which is playable but not as fluid. The High preset at 1080p drops to 38 FPS, which is on the edge of playability for a fast-paced FPS.

At higher resolutions, the situation becomes untenable. The 1440p Low preset averages 42 FPS, which might be acceptable on a lower refresh rate monitor, but the quality trade-off is significant. The 4K presets are all unplayable, with the best option being Low at 24 FPS, which is a slideshow. The Ultra presets are not recommended at any resolution, as they produce an average of 26 FPS at 1080p and 10 FPS at 4K, making the game unresponsive.

The data suggests that the sweet spot for this combo is 1080p with Low settings. This configuration provides a stable, high frame rate that is suitable for the game's mechanics. If the user insists on higher settings, the Medium preset at 1080p is the only other reasonable choice, but it sacrifices 14 FPS compared to Low. The measured minimum FPS for Medium at 1080p is 41 FPS, which is still within a playable range, but the average of 48 FPS indicates that the experience will not be consistently smooth. For the best measured experience, Low settings at 1080p is the clear recommendation.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution and settings for this combo in Evolve?*

A: The only configuration that achieves an average frame rate above 60 FPS is 1920x1080 with the Low preset, hitting 62 FPS. This is the recommended setup for a playable experience.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K in Evolve?*

A: No. The highest average frame rate at 3840x2160 is 24 FPS on the Low preset. The Ultra preset drops to 10 FPS, making 4K unplayable in all configurations.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU is a high-end 8-core part ranking in the 94th percentile, while the GPU is a low-end part ranking in the 25th percentile. The frame rates scale heavily with resolution, which is a classic sign of a GPU limitation.

Q: How does the GTX 1050 Ti compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti has an average benchmark score of 4193. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R5 M330, scores 4170, which is 0.6% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro K3000M scores 4241, which is 1.1% higher.

Q: What is the measured frame rate at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured average frame rate at 2560x1440 with High settings is 25 FPS. This is not a playable frame rate for a FPS title.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 9700F a fast processor?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996 and ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the defining component in this benchmark, and its limitations are the primary reason for the low performance. The GPU is based on the Pascal architecture and features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. Its compute capability is rated at 2.138 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, which is a modest figure for a desktop GPU. The card operates at a base clock of 1291 MHz and a boost clock of 1392 MHz.

The memory subsystem is a critical weakness. The GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 112.1 GB/s of bandwidth. In a game like Evolve, which can be demanding on textures and memory, this capacity and bandwidth are insufficient for high resolutions and settings. The 4 GB VRAM is likely a major factor in the poor performance at 4K, where texture data exceeds the available memory. The data shows that the GPU's average benchmark score is 4193, placing it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon R5 M330, which scores 4170, and the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M, which scores 4151.

The GPU's role in the measured results is clear. It is the sole bottleneck. The frame rates across all settings and resolutions are consistent with a GPU that is being pushed to its absolute limit. The 14nm process node and the 3,300 million transistors are simply not enough to handle modern workloads or even the demands of a 2015 title at high settings. The card's end-of-life production status is reflected in its benchmark performance. It is a legacy part that is outclassed by even entry-level modern GPUs, and the measured FPS data confirms this.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a high-performance processor that is severely underutilized in this benchmark. It is a Zen 5 architecture part with 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is 3.80 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.50 GHz, which is excellent for gaming workloads. The CPU has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, which is ample for a game from 2015. It supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

The CPU's benchmark scores show its immense capability. It has a passmark multithread score of 36470 and a passmark single-thread score of 4691. The average benchmark score is 69996, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (0.2% higher) and the Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.2% lower). These are all top-tier processors, indicating that the 9700F is in the same performance class as the best consumer chips available.

In Evolve, the CPU is not the limiting factor. The game is a 2015 release, and the 9700F's 8 cores and high clock speeds are more than enough to handle its physics, AI, and game logic. The measured frame rates do not change in a way that would indicate a CPU bottleneck; the FPS scales directly with resolution and settings, which is the signature of a GPU bottleneck. The CPU is likely waiting for the GPU to render each frame, meaning it is not being fully utilized. The data shows that the system's performance is dictated by the GTX 1050 Ti, and the Ryzen 7 9700F's potential is left on the table.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. All figures are averages, with minimum and maximum values provided only for the Medium preset.

At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:

• Low: 62 FPS average.
• Medium: 48 FPS average, with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 55 FPS.
• High: 38 FPS average.
• Ultra: 26 FPS average.

At 2560x1440, the performance drops significantly:

• Low: 42 FPS average.
• Medium: 32 FPS average, with a minimum of 27 FPS and a maximum of 37 FPS.
• High: 25 FPS average.
• Ultra: 17 FPS average.

At 3840x2160, the system is unable to maintain playable frame rates:

• Low: 24 FPS average.
• Medium: 18 FPS average, with a minimum of 16 FPS and a maximum of 21 FPS.
• High: 14 FPS average.
• Ultra: 10 FPS average.

These numbers illustrate a linear and predictable decline in performance as the workload increases. The Medium preset at 1080p, with its min/max data, shows a 14 FPS variance, which indicates some frame time inconsistency. The data confirms that this combination is only suitable for 1080p gaming at the lowest settings. The 1440p and 4K results are all below 45 FPS, which is not acceptable for a competitive FPS title. The Ultra preset is unplayable at every resolution, with the highest average being 26 FPS at 1080p. This breakdown serves as a definitive guide to what users can expect from this hardware pairing.