Downfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 192 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 68 | 109 | 133 | 163 |
| 1440p QHD | 110 | 176 | 214 | 262 |
| 1080p Full HD | 154 | 246 | 300 | 366 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Downfall is a 2016 horror title, and the measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti shows a system that can handle the game with ease at nearly every setting. The benchmark results indicate that the most demanding preset, Ultra, still delivers a very playable experience even at 4K. The data shows that the Ultra preset provides a significant visual upgrade over High while remaining well within the bounds of high-refresh-rate gaming, making it the clear choice for owners of this hardware.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear picture of how this combo scales with visual fidelity. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 154 FPS, which is a substantial drop from the 246 FPS seen at High, but it is still exceptionally smooth. The jump from High to Ultra is the most demanding step in the settings ladder across all resolutions. At 1440p, the Ultra preset averages 110 FPS, which is an excellent result for a modern title, and at 4K, it still manages a respectable 68 FPS average. Given that this is a horror game where atmosphere and visual fidelity contribute heavily to the experience, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice. The performance cost is a 37% reduction from High at 1080p, but the resulting frame rate is still far above the threshold for smooth gameplay.
For players who prioritize maximum frame rates, the High preset at 1440p offers an average of 176 FPS, which is a significant increase over the Ultra preset's 110 FPS. This suggests that High is the sweet spot for competitive or high-refresh-rate displays. However, the data shows that the system is powerful enough to run the game at its maximum settings without dipping into problematic territory. The Medium preset, which averages 300 FPS at 1080p, 214 FPS at 1440p, and 133 FPS at 4K, offers a balanced middle ground, but the visual compromise is unnecessary given the headroom available. The Low preset achieves extremely high frame rates, such as 366 FPS at 1080p, but the data suggests this is only useful for players targeting extremely high refresh rates or minimizing latency, as the hardware can clearly handle higher quality settings. The benchmark results indicate that the Ultra preset is the optimal choice for this hardware combination, providing the best visual experience while maintaining a solid average FPS across all tested resolutions.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the primary driver of performance in Downfall, especially as resolution increases. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, which is sufficient for the game's assets at 4K resolution. The measured data shows a clear correlation between resolution and frame rate, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU's boost clock of 2610 MHz and its Ada Lovelace architecture, with 7680 shading units, contribute to its raw compute power, which is reflected in its benchmark scores. For instance, the GPU scores 31624 in the passmark_g3d benchmark, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs.
The data shows that the RTX 4070 Ti's performance is strong enough to push the Ultra preset to an average of 68 FPS at 4K, but the scaling from High to Ultra is steep, suggesting that the GPU is being heavily taxed by the most demanding settings. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, has an average benchmark score that is 0.8% lower, indicating that the desktop RTX 4070 Ti is performing at a very high level. The GPU's performance in this game is consistent with its standing among other GPUs, where it sits in the 84th percentile. The 12 GB of VRAM appears to be a non-issue in this title, as the game does not seem to be bottlenecked by memory capacity, even at the highest settings and resolution. The data indicates that the GPU is the component that scales the most with resolution changes, and its capabilities are well-matched to the demands of Downfall.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested hardware combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 335th out of 2928 combos. This places the system in the top 11.4% of all tested configurations for Downfall. The data shows that this is a high-end pairing that delivers a top-tier gaming experience. The CPU itself is a dominant force, with its average benchmark score of 84003 placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, has an average score that is only 0.2% higher, showing that the 290K Plus is essentially at the peak of CPU performance. The GPU, while not as dominant as the CPU, is still a strong performer, sitting in the 84th percentile of all GPUs.
This combination of a top-tier CPU and a high-end GPU results in a system that is well-balanced for gaming. The high rank of 335 out of 2928 combos indicates that there are many other configurations that can outperform it, but the vast majority of systems tested will not match its performance. The data suggests that the system is not heavily bottlenecked by either component, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution. This ranking is a strong indicator that for a 2016 title like Downfall, this hardware is far more than sufficient, providing a very high level of performance that will be able to handle the game with ease at maximum settings. The combo's rank reflects the capabilities of both the CPU and GPU working in tandem.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for a 60 Hz display?
A: The data shows that the Ultra preset at 4K averages 68 FPS, which is above the 60 Hz threshold. This makes 4K Ultra a viable option for a standard 60 Hz monitor, providing the highest visual quality while maintaining a smooth frame rate.
Q: Can this system handle high refresh rate gaming at 1080p?
A: Yes. The benchmark results show that at 1080p, the High preset averages 246 FPS and the Medium preset averages 300 FPS. Even the demanding Ultra preset averages 154 FPS, which is sufficient for a 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitor, offering a highly responsive experience.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest rival?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus has an average benchmark score of 84003, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K's score of 83807. This indicates that the 290K Plus is effectively at the same performance level as its direct predecessor.
Q: Is the GPU's memory capacity a limiting factor in this game?
A: The data does not suggest that the 12 GB of VRAM is a limiting factor. The game's performance scales consistently with resolution and settings, and there are no measured anomalies that would indicate a memory bottleneck, even at the 4K Ultra preset.
Q: What is the performance difference between the High and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: The High preset averages 176 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 110 FPS. This is a 60% decrease in frame rate when moving from High to Ultra, showing that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding on the GPU.
Q: How does the GPU's overall benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44795, which is 0.8% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile's score of 45152. In this comparison, the desktop card is slightly ahead of the mobile part.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At the High preset, the system averages 246 FPS at 1080p, 176 FPS at 1440p, and 109 FPS at 4K. This represents a 29% drop in performance from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 38% drop from 1440p to 4K. This scaling behavior is typical for a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. The CPU, with its 24 cores and 24 threads, is powerful enough to feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU's workload increases significantly with each pixel count jump.
The trend is consistent across all settings. At the Ultra preset, the system averages 154 FPS at 1080p, 110 FPS at 1440p, and 68 FPS at 4K. The frame rate at 4K is less than half of the 1080p figure, which strongly indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti is the limiting component at this resolution. The data shows that the system is not CPU-bound in this game, as the frame rates scale smoothly with resolution, rather than plateauing at a certain level. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly steep, with the average FPS dropping by roughly 40% at both High and Ultra settings. This suggests that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute power are being exhausted by the 4K resolution, making it the definitive bottleneck. The system's performance is well-balanced, but the resolution scaling clearly identifies the GPU as the component that dictates the final frame rate.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a powerhouse that ensures the system is never starved for processing power in Downfall. With 24 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 3.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, this CPU provides an immense amount of headroom for gaming. The benchmark results show that the CPU is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 84003. Its performance in single-threaded tasks, such as the passmark_single_thread score of 4823, is critical for gaming, as most games rely heavily on a few cores. The data indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor in this title, as the frame rates are more dependent on the resolution and settings, which affect the GPU's workload.
The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, has a nearly identical average benchmark score, with a delta of just 0.2%. This shows that the 290K Plus is at the very top of the performance spectrum for its generation. The high core count and fast clock speeds are more than adequate for a game from 2016, which likely does not leverage multi-threading as effectively as modern titles. The data suggests that the CPU's role in this specific game is to provide a stable and high-performance foundation, allowing the GPU to operate at its full potential. The passmark_multithread score of 60860 further reinforces the CPU's capability, but for a game like Downfall, the single-core performance and high boost clock are the most relevant attributes. The system's performance is not hindered by the CPU, as evidenced by the smooth frame rates at 1080p, where a weaker CPU would typically cause a bottleneck.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 163.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 133.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 109.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 68.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 262.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 214.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 176.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 110.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 366.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 300.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 246.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 154.0 |
Downfall with iUltra 9 290K Plus + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RTX 4070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 9 290K Plus + RTX 4070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.