Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 100 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 57 | 68 | 88 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 91 | 115 | 138 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 129 | 154 | 194 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The pairing of Intel’s Core Ultra 7 265K with NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Downfall produces a broad performance spread that clearly delineates the responsibilities of each component. At 1080p Low, the system delivers an average of 194.1 FPS, a figure that highlights the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU with ample data. However, the horror title’s demands scale aggressively with resolution and quality, and the data shows the RTX 2060 SUPER becoming the primary constraint as visual load increases, particularly at 4K Ultra where the average frame rate drops to 34.1 FPS. This is not a balanced pairing for high-end 4K gaming; it is a configuration that excels at high-refresh 1080p and remains playable at 1440p with adjusted settings.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a classic GPU-bound scaling pattern. Moving from 1080p Low to 4K Low, the average frame rate falls from 194.1 FPS to 88 FPS, a reduction of 106.1 FPS. This steep decline is consistent with a graphics card that is working harder to fill more pixels, rather than a CPU bottleneck, as the processor’s 20 cores and 5.50 GHz boost clock are more than capable of handling the lower-resolution workload. At Medium settings, the drop is from 153.6 FPS at 1080p to 67.6 FPS at 4K, a loss of 86 FPS, which again underscores the GPU’s pixel-pushing limits.
The High preset tells a similar story: 129 FPS at 1080p, 90.9 FPS at 1440p, and 56.5 FPS at 4K. The incremental declines from 1080p to 1440p (38.1 FPS) and from 1440p to 4K (34.4 FPS) suggest a linear-ish scaling penalty as resolution increases, which is typical for a mid-range GPU like the RTX 2060 SUPER. The most demanding scenario, 4K Ultra, yields only 34.1 FPS, making it largely unplayable for smooth gameplay. Notably, the difference between 1080p High (129 FPS) and 1440p High (90.9 FPS) is a 38.1 FPS drop, while the jump from 1440p High to 4K High costs another 34.4 FPS. This indicates that the RTX 2060 SUPER’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are overwhelmed at higher resolutions, making the GPU the definitive limiting component.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader database of tested combinations, this specific pairing holds a rank of 1253 out of 1741 combos for Downfall. This places it in the lower third of all tested systems, which is a reasonable reflection of the GPU’s age and tier. The RTX 2060 SUPER, despite being paired with a top-tier modern CPU, scores in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, while the Core Ultra 7 265K sits in the 97th percentile among all CPUs. This disparity is the root cause of the combo’s ranking: the processor is overqualified for the graphics workload that the RTX 2060 SUPER can handle.
Benchmark results indicate that the GPU’s average score of 19774 is competitive with its immediate rivals, but it is not a high-end performer. For instance, the RTX 2060 SUPER is only 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2070 in average benchmark score, and 0.3% ahead of the GTX TITAN. However, these are all older cards, and the 4K Ultra result of 34.1 FPS shows that the GPU struggles with modern titles at maximum settings. The combo’s rank of 1253 suggests that many other tested systems, likely those with newer GPUs, will outperform it in Downfall, even if the CPU is a top-tier part. The data implies that users should not expect this pairing to deliver high-refresh 4K experiences; it is a 1080p and 1440p solution.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a formidable processor on paper, featuring 20 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 3.90 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It belongs to the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC, and supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. In synthetic benchmarks, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50009 and a single-core score of 7060, which are strong results that place it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Core Ultra 7 265KF and Core i9-14900KF, both of which it trails by a mere 0.2% in average benchmark score, indicating a tight competition at the top.
In Downfall, the CPU’s role is to maintain high frame rates when the GPU is not the bottleneck. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the 194.1 FPS result is likely near the CPU’s limit, but it is more than sufficient for smooth gameplay. The CPU’s 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache help with game logic and asset streaming, but the game’s horror genre typically does not require extreme multi-threading. The 20 threads provide headroom, but the measured FPS at higher resolutions shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor; the GPU is. The processor’s high single-thread performance (Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2965) ensures that it can handle the main game thread without dragging down the average FPS, even at 1080p where the GPU has more room to work.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combo in Downfall?*
A: The highest recorded average FPS is 194.1 at 1080p with Low settings. This drops to 129 FPS at High settings and 77.9 FPS at Ultra.
*Q: Is this combo suitable for 4K gaming in Downfall?*
A: The data suggests it is not ideal. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 34.1, which is below the generally accepted smoothness threshold. Even at 4K Low, the average is 88 FPS, but visual quality is compromised.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in terms of average benchmark score?
A: The Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 79102. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Core i9-14900KF by 0.2%, and the Intel Core i9-14900K by 0.9%. It is also 1.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7413.
Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).
Q: Does the CPU’s integrated graphics have any impact on gaming performance?
A: The Core Ultra 7 265K includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, but the presence of a discrete GPU means this integrated graphics is not used for rendering in this configuration. The measured FPS data comes from the RTX 2060 SUPER.
Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested combinations?
A: In Downfall, this combo ranks 1253 out of 1741 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of the database.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is the clear bottleneck in this pairing, and the data quantifies its limitations. Built on the Turing architecture with a TU106 chip using a 12 nm process, the GPU has 2176 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Its boost clock is 1650 MHz, and it offers 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p but insufficient for high-end 4K textures. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19774 places it in the 63rd percentile, and it is just 0.3% ahead of the GTX TITAN and 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2070 in average score, showing that it is a mid-range performer.
In Downfall, the GPU’s role is dominant. The frame rate drops from 194.1 FPS at 1080p Low to 34.1 FPS at 4K Ultra, a clear sign that the graphics card is working at its limits. The 8 GB VRAM is a particular concern at 4K Ultra, where texture data exceeds what the card can efficiently handle, leading to the low 34.1 FPS average. At 1440p, the GPU performs better, with 137.8 FPS at Low and 55.2 FPS at Ultra, but the latter is still below the 60 FPS target for smooth play. The GPU’s 175 W TDP and dual-slot design are typical for the 20-series, but its end-of-life production status means it has no future headroom for newer titles. The data confirms that while the CPU has vast untapped potential, the RTX 2060 SUPER defines the overall gaming experience in Downfall, making it a 1080p-first card with playable 1440p performance at medium settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 88.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 67.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 56.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 137.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 115.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 90.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 194.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 153.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 129.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 77.9 |
Downfall with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RTX 2060 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 2060 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.