Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 114 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 42 | 67 | 81 | 96 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 106 | 127 | 152 |
| 1080p Full HD | 91 | 148 | 179 | 215 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
# Downfall with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
This combo pairs a 12-core Intel Core i7-12700K (Alder Lake-S, 20 threads, boost up to 5.00 GHz) with an 11 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Pascal, 3584 shading units, 484.4 GB/s bandwidth). Together, they rank 995th out of 1741 tested combos in Downfall, placing them in the lower-middle tier of the database. The measured frame rates reveal a system that can handle 1080p and 1440p comfortably, but struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K Ultra settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Downfall?
A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the strongest resolution, delivering 214.9 FPS at Low settings and 91 FPS at Ultra. At 2560x1440, High settings still achieve 106.2 FPS, while 3840x2160 only reaches 66.5 FPS at High and drops to 42.4 FPS at Ultra.
Q: How does the GTX 1080 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The GTX 1080 Ti's average benchmark score of 19402 puts it nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 (deltaPct 0) and AMD Radeon Pro 560X (deltaPct -0.1). It is 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA TITAN Xp and 0.6% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K40m.
Q: What is the CPU's relative performance standing?
A: The Core i7-12700K sits at the 89th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35684. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, scores 35802, just 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i7-13800H trails by 0.8%, while the Core i5-14500HX leads by 0.7%.
Q: Does the combo maintain playable frame rates at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, only Low settings (95.6 FPS) and Medium settings (80.6 FPS) exceed 60 FPS. High settings produce 66.5 FPS, but Ultra drops to 42.4 FPS, which falls below typical smoothness thresholds.
Q: How does the GTX 1080 Ti's memory configuration affect Downfall?
A: The GPU features 11 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus, providing 484.4 GB/s bandwidth. This large frame buffer helps at higher resolutions, but the Pascal architecture's 16 nm process and 250 W TDP limit its raw throughput in a 2016 horror title optimized for newer hardware.
Q: What is the CPU's multithreaded capability in synthetic tests?
A: The Core i7-12700K achieves 29241 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 9979 in 3DMark max threads. Its PassMark multithread score of 34404 and Geekbench multicore score of 13892 show strong scaling across its 12 cores and 20 threads.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 995 out of 1741 tested combinations places it squarely in the middle of the distribution. This positioning is curious given the hardware's individual strengths: the CPU sits at the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. The discrepancy suggests Downfall's performance is heavily influenced by GPU capability rather than CPU headroom.
Benchmark results indicate the GTX 1080 Ti's average score of 19402 is modest by modern standards, with its percentile rank of 61 meaning roughly 39% of tested GPUs outperform it. The CPU, by contrast, is a high-end part with an average score of 35684, placing it well above most processors in the database. This mismatch explains why the combo ranks lower than the CPU's percentile would suggest — the GPU becomes the limiting factor in demanding scenes.
The rank also reflects the GPU's age relative to the game's 2016 release. While the GTX 1080 Ti launched in 2017, its Pascal architecture lacks the modern features that newer GPUs bring to DirectX 12 titles. The measured FPS data confirms this: at 4K Ultra, the combo manages only 42.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players expect, even for a horror game where atmosphere matters more than twitch reflexes.
GPU Role
The GTX 1080 Ti's specifications tell a story of a once-flagship card now showing its age. With a base clock of 1481 MHz and boost clock of 1582 MHz, the GP102 chip processes pixels at 139.2 GPixel/s and textures at 354.4 GTexel/s. Its 11.34 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is substantial, but the 16 nm process node and 250 W TDP indicate the design predates the efficiency gains of newer architectures.
Memory bandwidth is a standout feature: 484.4 GB/s from 11 GB of GDDR5X across a 352-bit bus. This bandwidth is critical for Downfall's horror environments, which often feature dense textures and dynamic lighting. The data shows the GPU's DirectX 12 benchmark score of 2231 in 3DMark Steel Nomad and 66 in PassMark DirectX 12, suggesting moderate DX12 performance that aligns with the measured FPS drops at higher settings.
The GPU's percentile rank of 61 and average score of 19402 place it near the GTX 780, which scores 19405, and the Radeon Pro 560X at 19426. This clustering indicates the 1080 Ti is no longer competitive with modern mid-range cards, despite its historical flagship status. In Downfall, the GPU's role is decisive: moving from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p drops FPS from 214.9 to 91, a 57.7% reduction that highlights the card's sensitivity to graphical complexity.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong performance across all settings. Low settings produce 214.9 FPS, Medium hits 178.7 FPS, High reaches 147.5 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 91 FPS. These numbers indicate a smooth experience at 1080p regardless of preset, with the gap between Low and Ultra (123.9 FPS difference) showing the GPU's scaling behavior under load.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain respectable but show more strain. Low settings achieve 151.9 FPS, Medium delivers 127.3 FPS, and High maintains 106.2 FPS. Ultra, however, drops to 63.7 FPS — still above 60, but close to the edge. The reduction from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra is 27.3 FPS, a 30% decrease that signals the GPU's pixel throughput limits.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings produce 95.6 FPS, Medium reaches 80.6 FPS, and High achieves 66.5 FPS. Ultra falls to 42.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and likely to feel choppy in fast-paced horror sequences. The step from High to Ultra at 4K costs 24.1 FPS, a 36.2% drop that makes Ultra impractical at this resolution.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, combined with 25 MB of shared L3 cache, provide substantial computational headroom. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 35684 confirm its high-end status.
Synthetic benchmarks demonstrate the CPU's strength: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 29241, while single-core reaches 4128. Geekbench multicore hits 13892, and PassMark multithread scores 34404. These numbers suggest the CPU is far from a bottleneck in Downfall, especially given the game's 2016 release date and likely single-threaded or lightly threaded engine design.
The CPU's nearest rivals reinforce its position. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35802 (0.3% higher), while the Intel Core i7-13800H trails by 0.8% at 35416. The Core i7-13700T scores 35468 (0.6% lower), and the Core i5-14500HX leads by 0.7% at 35940. These tight margins indicate the 12700K sits in a crowded performance band where differences are negligible in real-world gaming.
In Downfall, the CPU's role is likely secondary to the GPU, as evidenced by the FPS scaling across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 214.9 FPS, which could strain CPU-bound scenarios, but the more demanding settings show GPU-limited behavior where FPS drops correspond to increased pixel workload rather than CPU workload.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data suggests that High settings offer the best balance of visual quality and performance across most resolutions. At 1080p, High delivers 147.5 FPS — well above smoothness thresholds and visually superior to Medium's 178.7 FPS with minimal perceptual difference. At 1440p, High maintains 106.2 FPS, which is excellent for a horror title where immersion matters more than competitive frame rates.
At 4K, High settings are the highest viable option, producing 66.5 FPS. While this exceeds 60 FPS, it leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. Medium settings at 4K yield 80.6 FPS, providing a more comfortable margin, but the visual downgrade may be noticeable in a game that relies on atmosphere. Low settings at 4K (95.6 FPS) are unnecessary unless the user prioritizes maximum smoothness.
Ultra settings are not recommended at any resolution. At 1080p, Ultra achieves 91 FPS, which is playable but not significantly better than High's 147.5 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra drops to 63.7 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 42.4 FPS. The data implies that Ultra's additional graphical effects exact a heavy toll on the GTX 1080 Ti without proportional visual benefits, making High the pragmatic choice for this hardware combination.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scaling pattern. At Low settings, 1080p produces 214.9 FPS, 1440p drops to 151.9 FPS (29.3% reduction), and 4K falls to 95.6 FPS (37.1% reduction from 1440p). This consistent decline across resolutions indicates the GPU is the primary limiting component, as the CPU's performance headroom remains constant regardless of pixel count.
At Ultra settings, the scaling is more dramatic: 1080p delivers 91 FPS, 1440p drops to 63.7 FPS (30% reduction), and 4K plummets to 42.4 FPS (33.4% reduction from 1440p). The steeper decline at higher settings suggests that additional graphical features amplify the GPU's workload disproportionately, making the 1080 Ti's 11 GB frame buffer and 484.4 GB/s bandwidth insufficient for 4K Ultra in this title.
The data implies that the limiting component shifts with resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads may occasionally constrain performance, especially at Low settings where 214.9 FPS approaches CPU-bound territory. However, at 1440p and above, the GPU's Pascal architecture becomes the clear bottleneck, with its 16 nm process and 250 W TDP limiting throughput despite the large memory allocation. This combination of a high-end CPU and mid-tier GPU creates a system that excels at 1080p and 1440p but cannot sustain 4K Ultra, making resolution scaling the primary consideration for users seeking the best experience in Downfall.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 95.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 80.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 66.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 42.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 151.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 127.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 106.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 63.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 214.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 178.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 147.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 91.0 |
Downfall with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with GTX 1080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + GTX 1080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.