Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 72 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 41 | 47 | 69 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 62 | 71 | 98 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 86 | 94 | 133 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti delivers a playable experience in Control, but the data reveals a system that is firmly balanced toward the GPU being the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The measured frame rates across the three tested resolutions provide a clear picture of how this combination handles the game’s demands, with the GTX 1080 Ti’s age showing most prominently at 4K, while the 12th Gen Intel processor provides ample headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck. This analysis walks through the benchmark rows to determine the optimal settings, the role of each component, and how this specific pairing stacks up against other tested configurations.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark results indicate that the High preset at 2560x1440 offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance for this combination. At this resolution, the average frame rate sits at 62.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while still providing the enhanced visual quality that the High preset offers over Medium. Dropping to Medium at 1440p yields 71.2 FPS, a modest 14.6% improvement, but the visual sacrifice is not justified when the High preset remains fluid. At 1920x1080, the High preset achieves 86.3 FPS, showing that the system has significant headroom at lower resolutions, but 1440p High remains the sweet spot for those with 1440p displays.
For users with 4K displays, the data suggests that the Low preset is the only viable option for playable frame rates, delivering 69.2 FPS at 3840x2160. The jump to Medium at 4K results in 47.1 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS target, and High drops further to 40.9 FPS. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it produces the lowest scores across the board: 35.3 FPS at 4K, 55.1 FPS at 1440p, and 72.2 FPS at 1080p. The performance delta between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 60.4 FPS, which represents a substantial 45.5% reduction in frame rate, indicating that the Ultra preset’s additional effects place a heavy load on the GTX 1080 Ti without providing a proportional visual return.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the defining component in this pairing, and its 11 GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus with 484.4 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for Control’s texture demands, but the raw compute power of the GP102 chip shows its limits. The GPU’s base clock of 1481 MHz and boost clock of 1582 MHz are solid for the Pascal architecture, yet the data shows that frame rates scale almost linearly with resolution, which is a hallmark of GPU-bound scenarios. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings drops the average FPS from 86.3 to 62.1, a 28% reduction, and the jump to 4K further reduces it to 40.9 FPS, a 34% drop from 1440p. This consistent scaling indicates that the GTX 1080 Ti’s 11.34 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is being fully utilized, and the GPU is the primary limiter at every resolution tested.
The benchmark scores for the GTX 1080 Ti place it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19402. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 with a deltaPct of 0, the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at -0.1%, and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp at 1.1%. This data shows that the GTX 1080 Ti is performing right in line with its expected standing, but the TITAN Xp’s slight 1.1% advantage highlights that even within the same generation, there is minimal headroom. The GPU’s 16 nm process node and 250 W TDP are consistent with its 2017 release, and the data suggests that while it can handle Control at 1080p and 1440p with adjusted settings, it is not a card for maxing out modern titles at high resolutions.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K provides a strong foundation for this gaming combo, with 12 cores and 20 threads running on the Alder Lake architecture. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz, combined with 25 MB of shared L3 cache, ensure that the CPU is not a limiting factor in Control’s frame rates. The benchmark results support this: the CPU sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35684. In multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench R23, it scores 29241, and its single-core score of 4128 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for game logic and physics calculations.
The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 with a deltaPct of -0.3%, the Intel Core i7-13700T at 0.6%, and the Intel Core i5-14500HX at -0.7%. These small deltas confirm that the i7-12700K is performing exactly as expected relative to its peers. In the context of Control, the data suggests that the CPU has ample headroom, as the frame rate scaling across resolutions is smooth and consistent, with no sudden drops that would indicate a CPU bottleneck. Even at 1080p Low, where the GPU is least stressed, the CPU maintains 132.6 FPS, which is well above what the GTX 1080 Ti can deliver at higher settings. The CPU’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with its PCIe Gen 4 interface, ensures that it is not constraining the GTX 1080 Ti’s PCIe 3.0 interface in any meaningful way.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti ranks 980 out of 1636 tested combos for Control. This places it in the lower-middle tier of all configurations, which is consistent with the GPU’s aging hardware. The rank is more reflective of the GPU’s performance than the CPU’s, as the i7-12700K is a high-end processor from 2021, while the GTX 1080 Ti is from 2017. The data shows that the combo’s position is driven by the GPU’s inability to maintain high frame rates at 4K, where it drops below 50 FPS even on Medium settings.
The ranking suggests that this combination is best suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, where it can achieve respectable scores. At 1080p High, the 86.3 FPS average places it well above the 60 FPS playability threshold, and at 1440p High, the 62.1 FPS is still acceptable. The combo’s rank of 980 out of 1636 indicates that there are 656 combinations that perform better, which is a substantial number, but it also means that 655 combinations perform worse. The data implies that users with this setup should consider upgrading the GPU before the CPU, as the i7-12700K is unlikely to be the limiting factor in Control or similar titles.
Resolution Scaling
The resolution scaling data for this combo reveals a clear GPU-bound pattern, with frame rates dropping significantly as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 132.6 FPS, which drops to 98.4 FPS at 1440p Low (a 25.8% decrease) and further to 69.2 FPS at 4K Low (a 29.7% decrease from 1440p). This scaling is consistent with a GPU that is running out of pixel fillrate and shading power as the pixel count increases. At High settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is from 86.3 FPS to 62.1 FPS (a 28% decrease), and from 1440p to 4K it drops to 40.9 FPS (a 34% decrease). The increasing percentage drop at higher resolutions indicates that the GTX 1080 Ti’s 88 ROPs and 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate are being saturated.
The scaling also shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck, as the frame rate deltas between resolutions are uniform across all settings. If the CPU were limiting, we would expect the frame rates to plateau at lower resolutions, but the data shows a continuous increase from 4K to 1080p for every preset. The largest absolute difference is between 1080p Low (132.6 FPS) and 4K Low (69.2 FPS), a difference of 63.4 FPS, which is entirely attributable to the GPU’s workload. This confirms that the i7-12700K is providing all the processing power needed, and the GTX 1080 Ti is the sole determinant of performance scaling.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution to play Control with this CPU and GPU combo?*
A: Based on the measured data, 2560x1440 with the High preset provides the best experience, achieving 62.1 FPS. This offers a solid balance between visual quality and performance, staying above the 60 FPS threshold.
*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Control?*
A: At 3840x2160, only the Low preset achieves a playable 69.2 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 47.1 FPS, and High falls to 40.9 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.
Q: How does the GTX 1080 Ti perform relative to its nearest rivals in the database?
A: The GTX 1080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 19402, placing it in the 61st percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 with a deltaPct of 0, followed by the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at -0.1% and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp at 1.1%.
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700K a bottleneck for the GTX 1080 Ti in this game?
A: No, the data shows no evidence of a CPU bottleneck. The frame rates scale consistently with resolution across all settings, indicating that the GPU is the limiting component. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29241 confirm its capability.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 132.6 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 72.2 FPS. This represents a 60.4 FPS reduction, or a 45.5% decrease in performance when moving from Low to Ultra.
*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Control?*
A: This combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti ranks 980 out of 1636 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier. The ranking is primarily influenced by the GPU’s performance at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 69.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 40.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 98.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 71.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 62.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 132.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 93.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 86.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 72.2 |
Control with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with GTX 1080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + GTX 1080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.