Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
126
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 126 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 45 72 87 107
1440p QHD 72 115 140 171
1080p Full HD 101 161 196 240

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 107
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 High 72
3840x2160 Ultra 45
2560x1440 Low 171
2560x1440 Medium 140
2560x1440 High 115
2560x1440 Ultra 72
1920x1080 Low 240
1920x1080 Medium 196
1920x1080 High 161
1920x1080 Ultra 101

Downfall with Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis

# Downfall Performance Analysis: Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7700

This combo ranks 1308th out of 2928 tested configurations in Downfall, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all hardware pairings. The Intel Core i7-12700K, with its 12 cores and 20 threads, sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 lands at the 58th percentile among GPUs. This pairing delivers playable frame rates across all tested resolutions, though the performance ceiling varies significantly depending on quality settings. The data reveals a system that can handle 1440p gaming with high settings comfortably, but struggles to maintain smooth performance at 4K Ultra. With an average FPS range from 45 at 4K Ultra to 240 at 1080p Low, this configuration demonstrates substantial headroom at lower resolutions while pushing the GPU to its limits at higher ones.

How This Combo Ranks

The 1308th position out of 2928 combos places this system in the 55th percentile of all tested configurations for Downfall. This ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other. The Intel Core i7-12700K's benchmark profile shows a strong multi-threaded presence — its PassMark multithread score of 34404 and Cinebench R23 multicore result of 19784 indicate substantial processing headroom. However, the CPU's nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores include the Intel Core i5-13600T at a -0.1% delta, the Intel Core i7-12700KF at -0.2%, and the Intel Core i7-13700T at -0.3%. These margins are razor-thin, suggesting that the 12700K performs essentially identically to its closest competitors in general compute tasks.

The GPU side tells a similar story. The RX 7700's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R9 370X at -0.1%, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 at -1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at -1.7%. The RX 7700's PassMark G3D score of 20974 puts it just above the RTX 3060 Ti in raw graphics performance, though the margin is small enough to be within normal benchmark variance. This suggests the combo's ranking is driven more by the GPU's mid-tier positioning than any CPU limitation.

In Downfall specifically, the combination's rank relative to all combos indicates that the game's horror genre and likely CPU-light rendering workload allow the RX 7700 to stretch its legs. The measured FPS data shows the system achieving 115 FPS at 1440p High, which is a strong result for a GPU in the 58th percentile. The ranking would likely be higher if the GPU had more headroom at 4K, where the Ultra preset drops to 45 FPS — a clear indication that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's 84th percentile standing means it has ample capacity to feed the GPU in most scenarios, making the combo's overall rank a reflection of GPU-tier performance rather than any systemic imbalance.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo better suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming in Downfall?

A: The data shows strong performance at both resolutions, but 1440p represents the sweet spot. At 1440p High, the system achieves 115 FPS, while 1080p High reaches 161 FPS. The 1440p result remains well above the 60 FPS threshold, making it the better balance of visual quality and smoothness.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to the RTX 3060 Ti in this system?

A: The RX 7700's average benchmark score of 15852 is -1.7% relative to the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129. In practical terms, the two GPUs perform nearly identically, with the RX 7700 holding a slight edge in the PassMark G3D test at 20974 versus the rival's score.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Downfall?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K High, the combo delivers 72 FPS, which is playable. However, 4K Ultra drops to 45 FPS, which may feel less smooth. The 4K Low preset at 107 FPS shows the GPU has raw capability, but Ultra settings push it beyond comfortable limits.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its rivals?

A: The i7-12700K's average benchmark score of 35287 is within -0.4% of its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 213PE at 35428. The margins against the i5-13600T (-0.1%), i7-12700KF (-0.2%), and i7-13700T (-0.3%) are all negligible, meaning the CPU performs on par with its direct competitors.

Q: Which settings preset provides the most consistent frame pacing?

A: The Medium preset offers the most stable experience, with measured min/max values available. At 1080p Medium, the system averages 196 FPS with a range of 167-226 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it averages 140 FPS with a range of 119-161 FPS. These narrow ranges indicate better frame pacing than other presets.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the primary bottleneck at 4K?

A: The GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K. The CPU's high percentile ranking (84th) and strong multi-thread scores suggest it has plenty of headroom, while the GPU's 58th percentile ranking and the steep FPS drop from 107 FPS at 4K Low to 45 FPS at 4K Ultra point to GPU-bound performance at this resolution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 serves as the primary performance driver in Downfall, equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's clock speeds are substantial: a base of 1900 MHz, a boost of 2459 MHz, and a game clock of 2041 MHz. Memory runs at 2438 MHz, effective 19.5 Gbps. These specifications position the card as a capable mid-to-high-tier option, though its 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it sits below the top tier.

The 16 GB VRAM capacity is notable for a card in this tier, and it proves sufficient for Downfall's requirements at all tested settings. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU's compute limits show, there is no indication of VRAM-related stuttering or texture pop-in affecting the measured results. The memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s supports high-resolution textures without bottlenecking the rendering pipeline.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 reflect its raw rendering capabilities. These scores correlate with the measured FPS data: the card can push 240 FPS at 1080p Low but drops to 45 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 40 ray tracing cores and 96 ROPs contribute to the card's ability to handle modern rendering techniques, though Downfall's horror aesthetic likely doesn't heavily tax these features. The FP32 compute of 25.18 TFLOPS provides ample shader processing power for this title's visual effects.

At 1440p, the GPU's performance profile is particularly strong. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 28-29% of average FPS across settings, which is a manageable drop. The GPU's 16 GB frame buffer ensures that even the highest texture quality settings at 1440p stay within memory limits, allowing the card to focus on compute rather than memory management. This is reflected in the 1440p High result of 115 FPS, which demonstrates the card's efficiency at this resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1080p, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 240 FPS, Medium achieves 196 FPS with a range of 167-226 FPS, High reaches 161 FPS, and Ultra drops to 101 FPS. These numbers indicate that the system is entirely GPU-bound at this resolution — the CPU's 12 cores and 20 threads have more than enough capacity to maintain these frame rates without becoming a limiting factor.

Moving to 1440p, the performance remains strong but shows expected scaling. Low settings average 171 FPS, a 69 FPS drop from 1080p. Medium averages 140 FPS with a 119-161 FPS range. High achieves 115 FPS, while Ultra drops to 72 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result is particularly interesting — it matches the 4K High result exactly at 72 FPS, suggesting that the GPU's workload at these two settings is similar in terms of rendering complexity.

At 4K, the performance curve steepens dramatically. Low settings still manage 107 FPS, which is playable, while Medium averages 87 FPS with a 74-100 FPS range. High drops to 72 FPS, and Ultra falls to 45 FPS. The 4K results reveal the GPU's limits clearly: the jump from Low to Ultra at 4K costs 62 FPS (from 107 to 45), whereas the same settings change at 1080p costs 139 FPS (from 240 to 101). This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is working near its maximum capacity even at Low settings.

The Medium preset is the only setting with complete min/max data across all resolutions. At 1080p, the range is 167-226 FPS (a 59 FPS spread). At 1440p, the range narrows to 119-161 FPS (a 42 FPS spread). At 4K, the range tightens further to 74-100 FPS (a 26 FPS spread). This pattern suggests that as resolution increases and the GPU becomes more saturated, frame time variance decreases, resulting in more consistent performance at the cost of lower average FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that scales predictably with resolution, with the GPU becoming increasingly dominant as the bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 240 at 1080p to 171 at 1440p (a 28.75% decrease) and then to 107 at 4K (a 37.43% decrease from 1440p). The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 55.42% of the original 1080p performance.

At High settings, the scaling is steeper. The drop from 1080p (161 FPS) to 1440p (115 FPS) represents a 28.57% decrease, while the drop from 1440p to 4K (72 FPS) is a 37.39% decrease. The total loss from 1080p to 4K at High settings is 55.28%. These percentages are remarkably similar to the Low preset, indicating that resolution scaling is consistent regardless of quality settings.

Ultra settings show the most dramatic scaling. From 1080p (101 FPS) to 1440p (72 FPS), the drop is 28.71%. From 1440p to 4K (45 FPS), the drop is 37.50%. The total 1080p-to-4K loss is 55.45%. This consistency across all presets — roughly 28-29% from 1080p to 1440p and 37-38% from 1440p to 4K — strongly suggests that the GPU's rendering pipeline is the limiting factor, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom even at 1080p where frame rates are highest.

The fact that 4K Ultra (45 FPS) is exactly half of 1080p Ultra (101 FPS) highlights the GPU's scaling limitations. The RX 7700's 256-bit memory bus and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p but become strained at 4K, especially with higher quality settings that increase memory pressure. The 16 GB VRAM capacity prevents capacity-related issues, but the bandwidth becomes a constraint at 4K Ultra. This pattern indicates that for this combo, 1440p is the practical ceiling for high-quality gaming, while 4K requires reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the High preset at 1440p is the recommended configuration. The 115 FPS average provides ample headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM ensures textures render without compromise. This setup delivers a 28.57% FPS reduction compared to 1080p High but offers substantially improved image clarity at a resolution that suits the RX 7700's capabilities.

For players prioritizing maximum smoothness, the Medium preset at 1080p offers the most consistent experience. The 196 FPS average with a 167-226 FPS range provides excellent frame pacing, and the narrow variance suggests fewer stutters compared to other presets. This configuration is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays, as the measured minimum of 167 FPS exceeds the refresh rate of most gaming monitors.

At 4K, the High preset at 72 FPS is the most viable option. While it requires a significant drop from 1440p High (a 37.39% reduction), the result remains above 60 FPS, making it suitable for slower-paced horror gameplay where absolute frame rate is less critical. The 4K Ultra preset at 45 FPS is not recommended for smooth gameplay, as the sub-60 FPS average may introduce noticeable judder in camera movements.

The Ultra preset is best reserved for 1080p, where the 101 FPS average keeps the experience playable. However, the difference between Ultra and High at 1080p is 60 FPS (a 37.27% reduction), which is a significant cost for presumably modest visual gains in a horror title. The Medium preset at 1440p, with its 140 FPS average and tight 119-161 FPS range, offers a compelling middle ground for users with 1440p displays who want both quality and speed. Ultimately, the data suggests that this combo performs optimally at 1440p with High settings, delivering a smooth, visually rich experience that leverages the GPU's strengths without exposing its 4K limitations.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700K

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2459 MHz MHz
TDP 200 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 107.0
3840x2160 Medium 87.0
3840x2160 High 72.0
3840x2160 Ultra 45.0
2560x1440 Low 171.0
2560x1440 Medium 140.0
2560x1440 High 115.0
2560x1440 Ultra 72.0
1920x1080 Low 240.0
1920x1080 Medium 196.0
1920x1080 High 161.0
1920x1080 Ultra 101.0

Downfall with ii7-12700K + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 7700 + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700K + RX 7700

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.