Downfall

The Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination delivers an exceptionally well-balanced experience in Downfall, with the data showing that the GPU is the primary performance driver at higher resolutions while the CPU provides ample headroom at 1080p. This pairing ranks in the 54th percentile of all tested combos, and the measured FPS indicates that the system is capable of exceeding 60 FPS at 4K High settings, which is a strong result for a horror title that demands both visual fidelity and smooth frame pacing.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Downfall?*

A: The data shows that 1440p is the sweet spot, with the system achieving 112.1 FPS at High settings and 132.5 FPS at Medium, providing a high-refresh-rate experience without the massive performance cost of 4K Ultra.

Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to its nearest rivals in this game?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 33721, which places it 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A5000. It is also 1% faster than both the AMD Radeon HD 7950 and the AMD Radeon RX 480.

Q: Is the Core i5-12400 a bottleneck for the RX 6700 XT?

A: No, the data indicates the CPU is not a limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 227.2 FPS, which suggests the GPU is still the primary constraint, as the i5-12400's single-thread score of 910 in 3dmark is sufficient to feed the GPU.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: The difference is substantial. At 3840x2160, Low settings yield 102.3 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to 44.8 FPS, a reduction of over 57% in average frame rate.

Q: How does this combo's ranking compare to the total number of tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 939 out of 1741 total combos, placing it just above the median. This suggests it is a mid-to-upper tier configuration for this specific title.

*Q: Does the 12 GB VRAM on the RX 6700 XT make a difference in Downfall?*

A: While the data does not isolate VRAM usage, the card's 384.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB GDDR6 memory provide ample capacity for High settings at 4K, where the combo still maintains a playable 66.4 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured results. The card's base clock of 2321 MHz and boost clock of 2581 MHz, combined with 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, drive the pixel throughput that Downfall demands at higher resolutions. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical asset for a horror game that often uses high-resolution textures to create atmosphere.

The GPU's 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a strong indicator of its rasterization power. The benchmark results confirm this, as the card's Passmark G3D score of 19786 places it in the 77th percentile of all GPUs. When examining the measured FPS, the GPU's role becomes clear: at 1080p Low, the system hits 227.2 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it falls to 44.8 FPS. This scaling pattern is classic GPU-bound behavior, where the rendering load increases exponentially with pixel count. The card's 160 TMUs and 413.0 GTexel/s texture rate also contribute to maintaining detailed surfaces without stuttering, which is essential for maintaining tension in a horror setting.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12400 and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT achieves a rank of 939 out of 1741 tested combos in Downfall. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations, indicating that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it outperforms the majority of systems tested. The rank is particularly impressive considering the CPU's mid-range positioning; the i5-12400 scores in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU also sits in the 77th percentile of all GPUs, creating a harmonious balance.

The data shows that this combo is not held back by a weak link. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-9700, has a nearly identical average score (19831 vs 19850), meaning the i5-12400 provides comparable processing power. Meanwhile, the GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, is only 0.7% faster on average, which is a negligible margin. This synergy means that the 939th rank is not due to a bottleneck but rather reflects the inherent performance ceiling of these two components when paired together. The system's ability to maintain 66.4 FPS at 4K High further validates its ranking, as many lower-ranked combos would struggle to reach 60 FPS at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the High preset at 2560x1440 provides the best balance of visual quality and performance for this combo. The system achieves 112.1 FPS at this setting, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides smooth motion for a game that relies on sudden scares. For users with 1080p displays, the Medium preset at 190.5 FPS is recommended, as it offers a significant frame rate advantage over High (153.9 FPS) with minimal visual degradation in a dark, atmospheric game.

At 4K, the High preset remains the best option, delivering 66.4 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The Ultra preset at 44.8 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as it drops below the 60 FPS threshold. For competitive play or maximum responsiveness, the Low preset at 1080p yields 227.2 FPS, but this sacrifices too much visual detail for a horror game where atmosphere is paramount. The Medium preset at 4K (80.5 FPS) is a viable alternative if users prioritize resolution over maximum detail, but High at 1440p offers the best overall experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptional frame rates: Low settings hit 227.2 FPS, Medium reaches 190.5 FPS, High achieves 153.9 FPS, and Ultra drops to 98.5 FPS. These numbers indicate that the combo is overkill for 1080p gaming in Downfall, as even Ultra settings provide a frame rate far above the standard 60 FPS target.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. Low settings yield 165.9 FPS, Medium delivers 132.5 FPS, High drops to 112.1 FPS, and Ultra falls to 68.4 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra at this resolution is significant, with a 43.7 FPS loss, suggesting that Ultra settings impose a heavy load on the GPU. At 3840x2160, the system still performs admirably: Low produces 102.3 FPS, Medium reaches 80.5 FPS, High maintains 66.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 44.8 FPS. The 4K results demonstrate that the RX 6700 XT is capable of 4K gaming, but only at lower presets.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 plays a supporting role in this configuration, and its specifications explain why it does not bottleneck the GPU. With 6 cores and 12 threads, the CPU provides sufficient parallel processing for modern game engines. The base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz ensure strong single-thread performance, which is critical for game logic and draw calls. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, and the CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 910 indicates robust per-core performance.

The CPU's benchmark results show it is more than capable of keeping up with the GPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15935 and single-core score of 2249 demonstrate solid compute performance. The Passmark multithread score of 18747 and single-thread score of 3456 further confirm this. When comparing to its nearest rivals, the i5-12400 is virtually identical to the Intel Core i7-9700 in average score (19850 vs 19831, a 0.1% difference), meaning there is no meaningful performance gap. In Downfall, the CPU's role is to ensure that frame times remain consistent, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. The fact that 1080p Low reaches 227.2 FPS suggests the CPU can handle high frame rates without becoming a limiting factor.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data from 1080p to 4K illustrates the classic pattern of a GPU-bound system. At 1080p High, the system achieves 153.9 FPS. When resolution increases to 1440p High, the frame rate drops to 112.1 FPS, a 27.2% decrease. Moving to 4K High, the frame rate falls to 66.4 FPS, a 40.8% drop from 1440p. This scaling is consistent with the GPU's rendering workload increasing proportionally with pixel count.

The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. At Ultra, the system drops from 98.5 FPS at 1080p to 68.4 FPS at 1440p (a 30.6% decrease) and then to 44.8 FPS at 4K (a 34.5% decrease). This suggests that the GPU's 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs are being pushed to their limits at 4K Ultra. Conversely, at Low settings, the scaling is less severe: 227.2 FPS at 1080p drops to 165.9 FPS at 1440p (27.0% decrease) and then to 102.3 FPS at 4K (38.3% decrease). The data clearly shows that the limiting component is the GPU, as the CPU's performance headroom remains consistent across all resolutions. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would plateau at higher resolutions, but the steady decline indicates the GPU is the primary constraint.