Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 78 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 47 | 52 | 66 |
| 1440p QHD | 42 | 74 | 88 | 105 |
| 1080p Full HD | 61 | 102 | 118 | 146 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER pairing in Downfall presents a clear study in bottleneck dynamics. The data shows a system where the CPU's substantial processing power is frequently held back by the GPU's older architecture, particularly as resolution climbs. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, offering practical guidance for optimizing your experience with this specific hardware combination.
Resolution Scaling
The measured frame rates reveal a classic GPU-bound scenario that intensifies with resolution. At 1920x1080, the combination shows its strength, with the Low preset hitting 146 FPS and High preset achieving 102.1 FPS. This suggests that at 1080p, the Ryzen 9 9900X has enough headroom to feed the GTX 1660 SUPER effectively, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. However, the scaling curve is steep. Moving to 2560x1440, the High preset drops to 74 FPS, a 27.5% reduction from 1080p. This indicates the GPU is starting to struggle with the increased pixel count, becoming the primary limiter.
The trend becomes more pronounced at 3840x2160. Here, the High preset falls to 47.2 FPS, a 36.2% drop from the 1440p figure. The Ultra preset at 4K is particularly telling, collapsing to 29.5 FPS. This is a 51.8% decrease from the 1440p Ultra score of 42.4 FPS. The data demonstrates that the GTX 1660 SUPER's 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus are insufficient for the demands of 4K rendering in Downfall.
The scaling pattern confirms the CPU is not the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The Ryzen 9 9900X, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, maintains consistent performance across the board. The frame rate drops are almost entirely attributable to the GPU's fillrate and memory bandwidth constraints. At 1080p, the system is more balanced, but even then, the GPU's age shows. The Low preset's 146 FPS versus the Ultra preset's 61.2 FPS at 1080p illustrates how much overhead the CPU has—it can deliver high frames when the GPU isn't stressed, but the GPU's architectural limits cap the maximum output.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU/GPU combo in Downfall?*
A: The data indicates 1920x1080 is the sweet spot. All presets except Ultra achieve above 100 FPS, with Low hitting 146 FPS. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset (105.3 FPS) remains above the 100 FPS threshold.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Downfall?*
A: Technically yes, but with compromises. The High preset averages 47.2 FPS, and Low averages 66 FPS. However, Ultra drops to 29.5 FPS, which is below the generally accepted smoothness threshold for a horror title.
Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X's benchmark performance compare to its rivals?
A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 54450 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D (54681) but 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F (54097) and 1.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (55304).
Q: Is the GTX 1660 SUPER a bottleneck for the Ryzen 9 9900X?
A: Yes, especially at higher resolutions. The GPU's average benchmark score is 14286, placing it in the 55th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT, scores 14389, a 0.7% difference. The CPU is far more powerful, so the GPU limits performance in most scenarios.
Q: Which settings preset provides the most balanced experience at 1440p?
A: The Medium preset at 87.8 FPS offers a good balance between visual quality and performance. The High preset (74 FPS) is also viable, while Ultra (42.4 FPS) may be too demanding for smooth play.
Q: What does the combo's rank of 1520 out of 1741 indicate?
A: It shows that this specific combination performs in the lower 13% of all tested combos for Downfall. This is a direct result of the GPU's age and mid-range positioning, despite the CPU's high-end capabilities.
CPU Role
The Ryzen 9 9900X is a high-end desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. This configuration provides substantial multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 scores of 46438 (multi-core) and 6555 (single-core). Its Passmark single-thread score of 4672 further confirms strong per-core performance.
In Downfall, a horror game, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, AI, and physics calculations. Given the game's 2016 release date, it is unlikely to leverage all 24 threads. However, the Ryzen 9 9900X's high boost clock and strong single-core performance ensure that it will not be a bottleneck, even in CPU-intensive scenes. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the system achieves 146 FPS, which is a high frame rate that suggests the CPU is efficiently feeding the GPU.
The 64 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support (with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth) also contribute to smooth data flow. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54450, places it far above the GPU's 55th percentile ranking. This disparity is the core issue: the CPU is ready for much higher performance than the GTX 1660 SUPER can deliver. When comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 9900X is effectively tied with the 9900X3D (-0.4%) and the Intel Core i7-14700F (+0.7%), meaning CPU choice would have minimal impact on Downfall performance compared to GPU upgrades.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend heavily on your target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p displays, the High preset at 102.1 FPS is the recommended starting point. It offers a significant visual improvement over Low (146 FPS) while maintaining a frame rate well above 60 FPS. If you prioritize maximum smoothness, the Medium preset at 117.5 FPS is an excellent choice. The Ultra preset at 61.2 FPS is playable but provides diminishing returns for the performance cost.
For 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 87.8 FPS provides the best overall experience. It maintains high fluidity while offering better visual fidelity than Low (105.3 FPS). The High preset at 74 FPS is also acceptable for those who prefer higher quality settings. The Ultra preset at 42.4 FPS is not recommended for action-heavy sequences, as the frame rate drops into a range that can feel less responsive.
At 3840x2160, the data suggests significant compromises are necessary. The Low preset at 66 FPS is the only reliable option for a smooth experience. The Medium preset (52 FPS) and High preset (47.2 FPS) are borderline, and the Ultra preset at 29.5 FPS should be avoided for serious gameplay. For 4K, prioritizing frame rate over visual details is essential with this GPU.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ranks 1520 out of 1741 tested combos in Downfall. This places it in the 87.3rd percentile of performance, meaning it outperforms only about 13% of all tested configurations. This low ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's limitations. The Ryzen 9 9900X is a top-tier CPU, but it is paired with a mid-range GPU from a previous generation.
The ranking reflects that this system is not optimized for high-end gaming at modern resolutions. The CPU's 94th percentile performance is wasted in this pairing, as the GPU's 55th percentile performance caps the system's overall capability. This is a clear case of CPU overkill relative to the GPU. If you were to upgrade the GPU, the frame rates would improve dramatically, as the CPU has ample headroom. The data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming or less demanding titles, rather than pushing high resolutions in Downfall.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following data represents the average FPS for each resolution and settings preset combination.
1920x1080:
- Low: 146 FPS
- Medium: 117.5 FPS
- High: 102.1 FPS
- Ultra: 61.2 FPS
2560x1440:
- Low: 105.3 FPS
- Medium: 87.8 FPS
- High: 74 FPS
- Ultra: 42.4 FPS
3840x2160:
- Low: 66 FPS
- Medium: 52 FPS
- High: 47.2 FPS
- Ultra: 29.5 FPS
The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in resolution reduces frame rates by roughly 30-40% for the same settings preset. The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and processing power are the primary constraints. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 84.8 FPS (146 vs 61.2). At 4K, that difference shrinks to 36.5 FPS (66 vs 29.5), as the GPU's absolute limits are reached. This breakdown confirms that the GTX 1660 SUPER is the definitive bottleneck in this system for Downfall.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 66.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 52.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 47.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 105.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 87.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 74.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 42.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 146.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 117.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 102.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 61.2 |
Downfall with Ryzen 9 9900X + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with GTX 1660 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X + GTX 1660 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.