Downfall
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 125 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 72 | 85 | 108 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 116 | 139 | 169 |
| 1080p Full HD | 103 | 161 | 193 | 238 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a broad performance envelope in Downfall, but the shape of that envelope changes dramatically depending on resolution and settings. The data shows a system that can handle high-refresh 1080p gaming with ease, yet struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K on maximum quality. This analysis breaks down the measured results to clarify where this combo excels and where its limitations become apparent.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and reveals a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 238.4 at 1920x1080 to 108.3 at 3840x2160, representing a 54.6% reduction. This is a classic sign that the Radeon RX 6750 XT is the limiting factor when pixel count rises, as the CPU has ample headroom at lower resolutions.
The scaling pattern is consistent across all settings. At Medium, the drop is from 193.4 to 85.2 FPS (56% reduction), while at High it goes from 161.4 to 71.6 FPS (55.6% reduction). The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic absolute decline, falling from 103.1 FPS at 1080p to just 45.2 FPS at 4K, a 56.2% loss. Interestingly, the percentage drop is remarkably uniform across all four settings, hovering around 55-56%. This uniformity suggests that the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth constraints scale linearly with resolution, rather than being affected by specific setting toggles.
At 2560x1440, the middle ground, the combo performs admirably. The Low preset achieves 169.3 FPS, Medium reaches 139.4 FPS, and High stays comfortably above 60 at 116 FPS. Even Ultra manages 71.8 FPS at this resolution. The data indicates that 1440p is the sweet spot for this pairing, where the Ryzen 9 5950X's strong multi-threaded performance can still feed the GPU adequately while the RX 6750 XT handles the rendering load without being overwhelmed.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the benchmark database, this specific CPU-GPU combination ranks 862 out of 1,741 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the middle of the pack, which is reasonable given the hardware's specifications. The Ryzen 9 5950X is a high-end CPU from the 5000 series, sitting in the 93rd percentile against all CPUs tested, but the Radeon RX 6750 XT is a mid-range GPU, ranking in the 79th percentile against all GPUs.
The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the Intel Core i5-14600K (0.2% higher average score) and the Intel Core i5-14600KF (0.6% higher), showing that the Ryzen 9 5950X is essentially on par with modern mid-range Intel options despite being older. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (0.2% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (0.3% lower), which puts the RX 6750 XT in a tight performance cluster. The combo rank of 862 out of 1,741 suggests that many other pairings outperform it, but it also means it beats roughly half of all tested combinations, making it a viable mid-pack option.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, the Medium preset appears to be the most practical choice across all resolutions. At 1080p, Medium delivers 193.4 FPS, which is far beyond what most displays can show, while at 1440p it hits 139.4 FPS, providing a smooth experience on high-refresh monitors. Even at 4K, Medium manages 85.2 FPS, which is playable and only slightly below the High preset's 71.6 FPS in terms of visual fidelity loss.
The High preset is a strong alternative for those prioritizing image quality over raw speed. At 1440p, it delivers 116 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive or immersive play. At 1080p, High reaches 161.4 FPS, offering a great experience. However, at 4K, High drops to 71.6 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced action but acceptable for a horror title where atmosphere matters more than twitch response.
The Ultra preset should be avoided at 4K, as it only achieves 45.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold most players consider smooth. At 1440p, Ultra hits 71.8 FPS, making it viable, but the jump from High to Ultra costs 44.2 FPS (a 38% reduction) for what is likely a marginal visual improvement. For a horror game like Downfall, the Medium preset at 1440p offers the best combination of fluidity and graphical fidelity, while High at 1080p is the safest choice for maximum frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete dataset provides a clear picture of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 238.4 FPS, Medium hits 193.4 FPS, High reaches 161.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 103.1 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent performance cost: moving from Low to Medium costs 45 FPS, Medium to High costs 32 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 58.3 FPS. The largest single-step penalty is between High and Ultra, indicating that the Ultra preset includes particularly demanding effects.
At 2560x1440, the numbers are 169.3 FPS (Low), 139.4 FPS (Medium), 116 FPS (High), and 71.8 FPS (Ultra). The relative gaps between presets shrink compared to 1080p, with Low to Medium costing 29.9 FPS, Medium to High costing 23.4 FPS, and High to Ultra costing 44.2 FPS. This compression suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the bottleneck regardless of settings, reducing the relative impact of preset changes.
At 3840x2160, the results are 108.3 FPS (Low), 85.2 FPS (Medium), 71.6 FPS (High), and 45.2 FPS (Ultra). The Low to Medium gap is 23.1 FPS, Medium to High is 13.6 FPS, and High to Ultra is 26.4 FPS. Notably, the Ultra preset's 45.2 FPS is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS across all tested scenarios, highlighting that 4K Ultra is simply beyond this GPU's capabilities for smooth gameplay.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT plays the dominant role in determining Downfall's performance, as evidenced by the resolution scaling data. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results suggest it becomes a limiting factor at higher pixel counts, particularly with the Ultra preset's increased texture and shadow demands.
The GPU's clock speeds are set at a base of 2150 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz. These relatively high clocks for the RDNA 2.0 architecture help the card maintain competitive frame rates, but the raw compute power of 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 is what ultimately caps performance. The 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs are enough for mid-range gaming, yet the 40 ray accelerators indicate that any ray tracing effects in Downfall would further strain the GPU, though the measured data does not include RT-specific tests.
Synthetic benchmarks show the GPU scoring 20,700 in Passmark G3D and 9,550 in Passmark GPU Compute, placing it in the 79th percentile overall. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, scores 35,264 versus the RX 6750 XT's 35,327 average, a 0.2% difference. This tight competition confirms that the RX 6750 XT is a solid but not exceptional performer, and its 12 GB VRAM buffer is adequate for Downfall's requirements at most settings, though the 4K Ultra result of 45.2 FPS suggests memory bandwidth constraints rather than capacity issues.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution to play Downfall with this combo?*
A: The data shows 2560x1440 as the optimal resolution. At Medium settings, it delivers 139.4 FPS, and even at High it maintains 116 FPS, providing a smooth experience. At 1920x1080, frame rates are higher but the visual fidelity is lower, while 3840x2160 causes significant frame rate drops, particularly at Ultra settings.
Q: How does the Ryzen 9 5950X compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 9 5950X has an average benchmark score of 49,062, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600K (49,166) and 0.6% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49,367). It is 0.7% higher than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698) and 1.1% lower than the AMD EPYC 4345P (49,595).
*Q: Is the Radeon RX 6750 XT capable of 4K gaming in Downfall?*
A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At Low settings, 4K averages 108.3 FPS, and at Medium it reaches 85.2 FPS. However, at High settings it drops to 71.6 FPS, and at Ultra it falls to 45.2 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, Low settings achieve 238.4 FPS while Ultra settings achieve 103.1 FPS. This represents a 135.3 FPS difference, with Ultra costing roughly 56.7% of the Low preset's performance.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ranks 862 out of 1,741 tested combos for Downfall. This places it in the middle of the pack, indicating it outperforms roughly half of all tested hardware pairings.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more at 1080p?
A: The data indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor even at 1080p when using Ultra settings, as the frame rate drops to 103.1 FPS. At Lower settings, the CPU has more influence, with Low settings reaching 238.4 FPS, suggesting the Ryzen 9 5950X can push beyond what the GPU can render at lower graphical loads.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 108.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 85.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 71.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 45.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 169.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 139.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 116.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 71.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 238.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 193.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 161.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 103.1 |
Downfall with Ryzen 9 5950X + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with RX 6750 XT + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 5950X + RX 6750 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.