Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
100
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 100 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 57 68 84
1440p QHD 57 93 114 134
1080p Full HD 82 129 158 189

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 84
3840x2160 Medium 68
3840x2160 High 57
3840x2160 Ultra 35
2560x1440 Low 134
2560x1440 Medium 114
2560x1440 High 93
2560x1440 Ultra 57
1920x1080 Low 189
1920x1080 Medium 158
1920x1080 High 129
1920x1080 Ultra 82

Downfall with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT combination in Downfall delivers a performance profile that is heavily dictated by the graphics card, though the processor’s strong multi-threading ensures the system never becomes the bottleneck. The data indicates a playable experience at most resolutions, but the gap between Low and Ultra settings reveals a significant cost to visual fidelity. This analysis examines the measured FPS across the full resolution and settings matrix, contextualizes the hardware against its direct rivals, and provides clear guidance on optimizing the experience.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested systems in Downfall?

A: The benchmark data places this configuration at rank 1230 out of 1741 total tested combos, putting it in the lower-middle portion of the database for this specific game.

Q: How does this processor compare to its closest rivals in general benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800XT scores within a tight margin of its nearest competitors. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, and 0.3% behind both the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the performance difference between the RX 6600 XT and its listed rivals?

A: The RX 6600 XT's average benchmark score is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 0.4% higher than the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, 0.9% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, and 1.5% lower than the AMD FirePro S7150.

Q: What is the best-case FPS scenario for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 189.2 FPS at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the dataset that approaches the 190 FPS mark.

Q: At which settings does the combo fail to maintain 60 FPS at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160 resolution, the Ultra preset drops to an average of 35.2 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at this resolution averages 57.3 FPS, also falling short of a smooth 60 FPS target.

Q: How much performance is gained by dropping from Ultra to Low at 1440p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 134.4 FPS, which is 77.3 FPS higher than the Ultra preset's average of 57.1 FPS. This represents more than a doubling of frame rate by reducing graphical fidelity.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is the primary driver of frame rates in Downfall, as evidenced by the massive scaling between settings at any given resolution. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which appears sufficient for this 2016 horror title even at 4K, since the Low preset at 3840x2160 still achieves 84.3 FPS. The GPU's boost clock reaches 2589 MHz, and its game clock is rated at 2359 MHz, with a base clock of 1968 MHz.

The data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is the limiting factor when moving from Medium to High to Ultra. At 1920x1080, the frame rate drops from 158.4 FPS at Medium to 129.0 FPS at High, and then plummets to 82.0 FPS at Ultra. This indicates that the Ultra preset introduces rendering features that heavily tax the 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs of the Navi 23 chip. The measured FPS numbers suggest that the GPU's compute resources, rated at 10.60 TFLOPS FP32, are stretched by the higher-fidelity effects, but the card still has enough headroom to handle the game’s demands at lower settings without issue.

Resolution Scaling

Analyzing the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 129.0 FPS at 1920x1080 to 92.6 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 57.3 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 55.6% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K, which is significant but not extreme, indicating the game engine scales well with pixel count.

The scaling pattern changes at different presets. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 189.2 FPS to 84.3 FPS, a 55.4% decrease. This consistency suggests that the GPU is consistently the bottleneck across all settings. However, the Ultra preset shows a different story: from 82.0 FPS at 1080p to 57.1 FPS at 1440p and 35.2 FPS at 4K. The 43.4% drop from 1080p to 1440p is steeper than the 30.4% drop seen at High settings, implying that the combination of high resolution and Ultra effects creates a compounding load on the GPU's memory subsystem and pixel throughput.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, all presets are playable. The Low preset averages 189.2 FPS, Medium averages 158.4 FPS, High averages 129.0 FPS, and Ultra averages 82.0 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 107.2 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset costs more than half the potential frame rate.

At 2560x1440, the situation remains solid. Low averages 134.4 FPS, Medium averages 114.4 FPS, High averages 92.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 57.1 FPS. The Ultra preset drops below the 60 FPS threshold, while High maintains a comfortable margin above it.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles at the top end. Low averages 84.3 FPS, Medium averages 67.9 FPS, High averages 57.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 35.2 FPS. Only the Low and Medium presets provide a consistently smooth experience at 4K, with High sitting right at the edge of playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1230 out of 1741 tested configurations places it in the 29th percentile of all systems tested for Downfall. This is a low ranking, but the context of the hardware is important. The CPU alone sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 71st percentile of all GPUs. The discrepancy between the two suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing, dragging the overall rank down.

The nearest rivals for the GPU highlight the competitive landscape. The RX 6600 XT is 0.9% behind the RTX 3070 in raw benchmark score, yet in Downfall, the measured FPS indicates that this small gap can translate into the difference between a stable 60 FPS and a sub-60 experience at 4K High. The data implies that the combo's rank is not necessarily a reflection of poor hardware, but rather the specific demands of this game at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal balance of performance and visual quality is the High preset at 1920x1080, which delivers 129.0 FPS. This provides a high frame rate with presumably better visual fidelity than Medium. For 2560x1440, the High preset at 92.6 FPS is the best choice, as it stays well above 60 FPS while offering more detail than Medium at 114.4 FPS. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as its performance cost is severe, particularly at 1440p and above.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 67.9 FPS is the safest recommendation, as it is the highest preset that remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 57.3 FPS is borderline and may be preferred by users who prioritize visuals over a smooth frame rate, but the data suggests that Medium is the most reliable choice for 4K gaming on this combo. For players with high refresh rate monitors, the Low preset at 1440p (134.4 FPS) or 1080p (189.2 FPS) will maximize fluidity.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides ample processing power for Downfall. The CPU's boost clock of 4.80 GHz and base clock of 3.80 GHz, combined with the Zen 3 architecture, ensures that it is not a bottleneck in this pairing. The benchmark scores reinforce this: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23794 and single-core score of 3359 place it well ahead of the demands of a horror game from 2016.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 86th among all CPUs is significantly higher than the GPU's 71st percentile, confirming that the processor has headroom to spare. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683 and the max-thread score of 7680 show consistent scaling across threads, which is useful for games that may offload background tasks. The memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s for DDR4 is sufficient for this GPU, as the measured FPS data does not show any signs of CPU-induced frame pacing issues. In summary, the CPU is a solid foundation, but it is the GPU that dictates the final performance in Downfall.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2589 MHz MHz
TDP 160 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 84.3
3840x2160 Medium 67.9
3840x2160 High 57.3
3840x2160 Ultra 35.2
2560x1440 Low 134.4
2560x1440 Medium 114.4
2560x1440 High 92.6
2560x1440 Ultra 57.1
1920x1080 Low 189.2
1920x1080 Medium 158.4
1920x1080 High 129.0
1920x1080 Ultra 82.0

Downfall with Ryzen 7 5800XT + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 6600 XT + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800XT + RX 6600 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.