Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
120
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 120 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 43 68 83 102
1440p QHD 69 110 134 164
1080p Full HD 96 154 187 229

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 102
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 High 68
3840x2160 Ultra 43
2560x1440 Low 164
2560x1440 Medium 134
2560x1440 High 110
2560x1440 Ultra 69
1920x1080 Low 229
1920x1080 Medium 187
1920x1080 High 154
1920x1080 Ultra 96

Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

# Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a playable experience across most of Downfall's settings, but the data shows a clear ceiling at 4K Ultra where frame rates dip below comfortable thresholds. The 7600X is a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 part on AMD Socket AM5, while the RX 6700 XT is an RDNA 2.0 GPU with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. Together they land at combo rank 1949 out of 3716 tested combinations, placing them in the upper-middle tier of the database. The measured results across three resolutions and four quality presets reveal a system that handles 1080p and 1440p with authority, but struggles to maintain high refresh rates at 4K when settings are pushed to maximum.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p displays, the Ultra preset is the recommended starting point. The data shows an average of 96 FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay in a horror title. The High preset at 1080p delivers 154 FPS, but the jump from High to Ultra only costs about 58 FPS while providing the full visual experience. Since the 1080p Ultra result remains comfortably playable, there is no reason to sacrifice image quality at this resolution unless targeting a 144Hz or higher refresh rate display, in which case High at 154 FPS is the better match.

At 1440p, the Medium preset at 134 FPS is the sweet spot for balanced performance. The High preset scores 110 FPS, which is still smooth, but Ultra drops significantly to 69 FPS. The 65 FPS gap between Medium and Ultra at 2560x1440 suggests the GPU is hitting a rendering ceiling as settings scale up. For players who prioritize frame rate consistency, Medium at 134 FPS with a minimum of 114 FPS provides a safer margin than High's 110 average. The Low preset at 164 FPS is excessive for most displays and sacrifices too much visual fidelity in a game where atmosphere matters.

For 4K, the situation changes dramatically. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 averages only 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth horror gameplay. The High preset at 68 FPS is the most viable option for 4K, offering a playable experience with decent visual quality. Medium at 83 FPS is also acceptable, though the gap between High and Medium is only 15 FPS, making High the better visual choice. The Low preset at 102 FPS at 4K is technically the smoothest, but the visual downgrade is substantial. The measured data suggests that 4K players should stick with High settings to balance frame rate and image quality, as the 43 FPS Ultra result is too choppy for a game that relies on tension and timing.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the Navi 22 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, using a 7 nm process from TSMC with 17,200 million transistors. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 192-bit bus. The GPU's base clock is 2321 MHz, with a boost clock of 2581 MHz and a game clock of 2424 MHz. These specifications place the RX 6700 XT at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 27425.

The VRAM capacity of 12 GB is sufficient for Downfall's demands across the tested resolutions. The data shows no evidence of memory-related stuttering or performance cliffs, even at 4K Ultra where the 43 FPS average suggests compute or bandwidth limitations rather than VRAM exhaustion. The GPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 with a delta of -0.5% and the RTX 4070 Mobile at 0% delta, indicating that the RX 6700 XT's raw compute performance is competitive with much higher-tier cards in synthetic tests.

The clock speeds play a significant role in the scaling pattern observed. The boost clock of 2581 MHz is relatively high for the RDNA 2.0 architecture, and the data shows that the GPU maintains strong performance at lower resolutions where clock speed matters more than memory bandwidth. At 1080p Low, the system hits 229 FPS, suggesting the GPU is not the primary bottleneck at that setting. The 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 413.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide ample headroom for the game's rendering demands at medium and high settings, but the 64 ROPs and 192-bit memory bus become limiting factors at 4K Ultra, where the 43 FPS result indicates the GPU is saturated.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Downfall with this combo?

A: The data shows 1440p Medium at 134 FPS as the most balanced experience, offering high frame rates with reasonable visual quality. 1080p Ultra at 96 FPS is also excellent, while 4K is limited to High settings at 68 FPS for playable performance.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Downfall?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The High preset at 3840x2160 averages 68 FPS, which is playable, and Medium averages 83 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 43 FPS, which is not recommended for smooth gameplay. Players should avoid 4K Ultra with this combination.

Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 6700 XT scores 27425 on average, placing it at the 72nd percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, scores 27435 with a 0% delta, while the RTX 3090 scores 27565 at -0.5% delta. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839 at -1.5% delta.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7600X a bottleneck for the RX 6700 XT in this game?

A: The 7600X scores 27636 on average, placing it at the 79th percentile among CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, both at 0.2% delta. The high frame rates at 1080p Low (229 FPS) suggest the CPU is not limiting performance in Downfall.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with maximum settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 96. This is above the 60 FPS threshold but below the 144 FPS needed for high-refresh displays. For higher refresh rates, the High preset at 154 FPS is the recommended choice.

Q: How does the combo rank compare to other tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 1949 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the upper-middle tier. The rank reflects the balanced performance of the 7600X and RX 6700 XT across the tested settings and resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest results. The Low preset averages 229 FPS, which is the highest measured result across all resolutions and settings. Medium settings average 187 FPS with a minimum of 159 FPS and maximum of 215 FPS, providing a wide margin above refresh rate targets. High settings average 154 FPS, still excellent for most displays. Ultra settings drop to 96 FPS, which is the only 1080p result below 100 FPS but remains fully playable. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 133 FPS drop, indicating that the GPU is doing progressively more work as settings increase, but the CPU has enough headroom to keep feeding frames.

At 2560x1440, the results show a similar pattern with lower absolute numbers. Low settings average 164 FPS, Medium averages 134 FPS with a minimum of 114 FPS and maximum of 154 FPS, and High averages 110 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 69 FPS, which is the first sign of the GPU struggling at higher resolutions. The gap between Medium and Ultra at 1440p is 65 FPS, compared to a 91 FPS gap at 1080p, suggesting that the GPU's rendering resources become more strained as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the performance ceiling becomes apparent. Low settings average 102 FPS, Medium averages 83 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS and maximum of 96 FPS, and High averages 68 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The minimum FPS of 71 at Medium 4K indicates that even the mid-range preset can dip below high refresh rates, though the average remains acceptable. The data shows a clear progression: 4K demands significant GPU resources, and only Low through High presets deliver playable frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial across all settings. At Low settings, the system goes from 229 FPS at 1080p to 164 FPS at 1440p to 102 FPS at 4K, representing a 55% reduction from 1080p to 4K. At Medium settings, the drop is from 187 FPS to 134 FPS to 83 FPS, a 56% reduction. High settings show 154 FPS to 110 FPS to 68 FPS, a 56% reduction. Ultra settings go from 96 FPS to 69 FPS to 43 FPS, a 55% reduction.

This consistent 55-56% reduction across all settings indicates that the limiting component scales linearly with pixel count. The RX 6700 XT's 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 192-bit bus are the likely constraints at higher resolutions, as the GPU must process 4 times the pixels at 4K compared to 1080p. The fact that the percentage drop is nearly identical across all settings suggests that the bottleneck is resolution-driven rather than settings-driven. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see a larger percentage drop at lower resolutions where frame rates are higher, but the data shows the opposite: the 1080p Low result of 229 FPS indicates the GPU is still the primary constraint at high frame rates.

The 1440p results sit almost exactly halfway between 1080p and 4K in terms of FPS, which is consistent with the pixel count scaling. This linear behavior suggests that the system's performance is well-balanced for this game, with no single component creating a disproportionate bottleneck at any resolution. The 4K Ultra result of 43 FPS is the only clearly unplayable configuration, and it aligns with the GPU's compute limits rather than any memory or CPU issue.

How This Combo Ranks

This Ryzen 5 7600X and RX 6700 XT combination ranks 1949 out of 3716 tested combos in Downfall, placing it at roughly the 52nd percentile of all tested systems. This mid-pack ranking reflects the balanced but not exceptional performance of this pairing. The CPU at the 79th percentile among all CPUs and the GPU at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs combine to produce a system that is capable but not top-tier.

The ranking suggests that many other combinations deliver higher frame rates in Downfall, likely due to more powerful GPUs or more balanced pairings. The 7600X's nearest CPU rivals — the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, both with 0.2% delta — would likely produce similar results when paired with the RX 6700 XT. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the RTX 3090 at -0.5% delta, indicate that the RX 6700 XT is competitive with much higher-priced cards in synthetic benchmarks, though real-world Downfall performance may differ.

The rank of 1949 out of 3716 means that approximately 1767 tested combos perform worse and 1948 perform better. This places the system in the upper half of the database but not in the top quartile. For a horror game like Downfall, where frame rate consistency matters more than absolute maximums, this ranking is adequate but not impressive. The system's strengths lie in 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers frame rates well above playable thresholds, and its weaknesses are exposed at 4K Ultra, where the 43 FPS result drags down its overall standing.

The data indicates that this combo is a solid mid-range choice for Downfall, suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high settings, but not designed for 4K enthusiasts. Players looking for a better 4K experience would need a more powerful GPU, while those focused on esports-level frame rates could benefit from a faster processor. The balanced nature of the 7600X and RX 6700 XT pairing makes it a reliable choice for mainstream gaming, with the measured results confirming its capability in this specific title.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2581 MHz MHz
TDP 230 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 102.0
3840x2160 Medium 83.0
3840x2160 High 68.0
3840x2160 Ultra 43.0
2560x1440 Low 164.0
2560x1440 Medium 134.0
2560x1440 High 110.0
2560x1440 Ultra 69.0
1920x1080 Low 229.0
1920x1080 Medium 187.0
1920x1080 High 154.0
1920x1080 Ultra 96.0

Downfall with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RX 6700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.