Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
154
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 154 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 89 108 132
1440p QHD 89 144 172 213
1080p Full HD 125 197 240 285

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 132
3840x2160 Medium 108
3840x2160 High 89
3840x2160 Ultra 57
2560x1440 Low 213
2560x1440 Medium 172
2560x1440 High 144
2560x1440 Ultra 89
1920x1080 Low 285
1920x1080 Medium 240
1920x1080 High 197
1920x1080 Ultra 125

Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination delivers a wide range of performance in Downfall, with the measured rows showing that the game’s visual presets have a more dramatic impact on frame rates than resolution scaling. Across all three tested resolutions, the Low preset produces the highest average FPS, but the jump from Low to Medium and then High is substantial, while the Ultra preset imposes a severe performance penalty. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves 284.8 FPS, which drops to 240.1 FPS on Medium and 196.9 FPS on High, before collapsing to 124.6 FPS on Ultra. This pattern holds at 1440p, where Low hits 212.6 FPS, Medium reaches 172.4 FPS, High maintains 143.7 FPS, and Ultra falls to 89 FPS. At 4K, the same scaling continues: Low produces 131.7 FPS, Medium 107.7 FPS, High 89.3 FPS, and Ultra only 57.1 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

The data strongly indicates that the High preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance for this combo. At 1080p, High delivers 196.9 FPS, which is well above the 124.6 FPS of Ultra while still providing a substantial improvement in rendering quality over Medium’s 240.1 FPS. The gap between High and Medium is only 43.2 FPS at 1080p, but High’s visual uplift is typically worth that trade-off in a horror title where atmosphere and detail matter. At 1440p, High runs at 143.7 FPS, which remains exceptionally smooth for the genre, and even at 4K, High holds 89.3 FPS—playable and fluid for most scenarios.

Ultra is not recommended for this pairing. The step from High to Ultra costs 72.3 FPS at 1080p (from 196.9 to 124.6), 54.7 FPS at 1440p (from 143.7 to 89), and 32.2 FPS at 4K (from 89.3 to 57.1). That is a massive drop for what is often a marginal improvement in shadow quality or post-processing effects. Conversely, Low is only advisable for competitive or high-refresh-rate play, as it pushes frame rates to 284.8 FPS at 1080p and 212.6 FPS at 1440p, but it sacrifices the game’s intended horror atmosphere. Medium serves as a middle ground, offering 240.1 FPS at 1080p and 172.4 FPS at 1440p, but High is the sweet spot where the RX 9070’s capabilities are fully utilized without the CPU becoming a limiting factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the best preset for a 1440p monitor with this CPU and GPU?

A: High is the strongest choice, delivering 143.7 FPS at 2560x1440. This is 54.7 FPS faster than Ultra’s 89 FPS and only 28.7 FPS slower than Medium’s 172.4 FPS, making it the optimal trade-off for visual quality and smoothness.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Downfall?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 3840x2160, High produces 89.3 FPS, which is playable, while Medium reaches 107.7 FPS and Low hits 131.7 FPS. Ultra drops to 57.1 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold for a horror game’s fast-paced moments.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K on the High preset?

A: The average FPS drops from 196.9 at 1920x1080 to 143.7 at 2560x1440, then to 89.3 at 3840x2160. This represents a 54.7 FPS reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further 54.4 FPS reduction from 1440p to 4K.

Q: Is the Ultra preset ever worth using with this hardware?

A: Only if visual fidelity is the absolute priority and frame rate can be sacrificed. At 1080p, Ultra runs at 124.6 FPS, which is still smooth, but at 1440p it drops to 89 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 57.1 FPS, making it less suitable for consistent gameplay.

Q: Does the CPU limit performance at any settings?

A: The Ryzen 5 3600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, appears sufficient for most presets. The 284.8 FPS result at 1080p Low suggests the GPU is still the primary driver, but the smaller FPS gaps at higher resolutions indicate the GPU becomes more stressed, not the CPU.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 566th out of 1741 tested combos for Downfall, placing it in the upper third of all systems. This is a solid position, given the game’s age and the hardware’s generational mix.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression across resolutions reveals a predictable scaling pattern that shifts the bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the combo is clearly CPU-bound at lower presets: Low hits 284.8 FPS, Medium 240.1 FPS, and High 196.9 FPS, but Ultra drops to 124.6 FPS, showing that the GPU starts to struggle with the heavier settings. Moving to 1440p, the frame rates scale down proportionally—Low at 212.6 FPS, Medium 172.4 FPS, High 143.7 FPS, and Ultra 89 FPS—which is roughly a 25% reduction from 1080p across all presets, indicating that the GPU is now the dominant factor.

At 4K, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low produces 131.7 FPS, which is 46.7% lower than the 1080p Low result, while High drops to 89.3 FPS, a 54.6% reduction from its 1080p counterpart. Ultra suffers the most, falling to 57.1 FPS, which is 54.2% below the 1080p Ultra score. This steeper decline at 4K confirms that the RX 9070’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed heavily, but the CPU’s 6-core, 12-thread configuration is not the limiting factor. The data shows that the frame rate halving from 1080p to 4K is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, where the Ryzen 5 3600’s 3.60 GHz base and 4.20 GHz boost clocks are sufficient to feed the GPU without creating a significant bottleneck.

How This Combo Ranks

With a rank of 566 out of 1741 tested combos, this pairing sits in the upper 32.5% of all configurations for Downfall. That is a strong showing, especially considering the Ryzen 5 3600 is a 3000-series part from 2019, while the RX 9070 is a current-generation RDNA 4.0 GPU. The combo’s position suggests that the GPU is doing most of the heavy lifting, as the CPU’s benchmark scores are modest—its average benchmark score of 18129 places it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i5-11400 at a delta of -0.1%. The GPU, meanwhile, has an average benchmark score of 34780, placing it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA A2 at a delta of -0.2%.

The rank of 566 also implies that many combos with newer CPUs or higher-tier GPUs outperform this setup, but the measured FPS results show that this pairing is far from inadequate. At 1080p High, the combo achieves 196.9 FPS, which is competitive with systems that rank much higher, and even at 4K Ultra, the 57.1 FPS result is playable for a horror game. The data indicates that the combo’s rank is dragged down by the CPU’s age rather than the GPU’s performance, as the RX 9070’s scores are in line with much more expensive alternatives.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, codenamed Matisse, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support provide adequate bandwidth for gaming, but its benchmark scores reveal its limits. In Cinebench R23, it scores 15045 multi-core and 2124 single-core, while in 3DMark tests, it achieves 4605 with 16 threads and 696 single-thread. These numbers place it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, with a 0.1% deficit against the Intel Core i5-11400 and a 0.2% edge over the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS.

In Downfall, the CPU’s role is to maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions where the GPU is not fully utilized. The 284.8 FPS result at 1080p Low demonstrates that the CPU can push well beyond 200 FPS, but the game’s settings have a larger impact on performance than resolution changes. The fact that Ultra at 1080p (124.6 FPS) is slower than High at 4K (89.3 FPS) shows that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at high settings, while the CPU only becomes a limiting factor at the highest frame rates. The Ryzen 5 3600’s 65W TDP and 7nm process node make it an efficient partner, but its 3.60 GHz base clock is modest by current standards, which explains why it ranks 566th overall despite the GPU’s strength. The data suggests that upgrading the CPU would yield diminishing returns in Downfall, as the RX 9070 is already delivering playable frame rates at all but the most demanding settings.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 3600

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 4200 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 131.7
3840x2160 Medium 107.7
3840x2160 High 89.3
3840x2160 Ultra 57.1
2560x1440 Low 212.6
2560x1440 Medium 172.4
2560x1440 High 143.7
2560x1440 Ultra 89.0
1920x1080 Low 284.8
1920x1080 Medium 240.1
1920x1080 High 196.9
1920x1080 Ultra 124.6

Downfall with Ryzen 5 3600 + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RX 9070 + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 3600 + RX 9070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.