Doom

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Doom, with the CPU’s immense cache and the GPU’s robust compute capability aligning to produce strong frame rates across all tested configurations. The data shows that this pairing is exceptionally well-balanced for the game’s engine, which scales effectively from 1080p to 4K. While the CPU holds a commanding lead in synthetic benchmarks, the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions and settings, as evidenced by the performance scaling patterns.

FAQ

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems in Doom?*

A: The combination ranks 755th out of 1681 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all recorded configurations. This position reflects a system that is capable of high refresh rates but is not at the absolute top of the leaderboard.

*Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Doom?*

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 263.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This indicates the system’s peak performance when the GPU workload is minimized.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 37780, which is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6353P (37811, -0.1%) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (37831, -0.1%). It trails the Intel Core i9-13900HK by a negligible 0.6% margin.

Q: What is the GPU’s position relative to other graphics cards in the database?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 XT holds a percentile rank of 73 among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 30097 is virtually tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which scores 30109 with a 0% delta.

Q: What is the FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At Ultra settings, the average FPS falls from 157.2 at 1920x1080 to 55 at 3840x2160. This represents a 65% reduction in frame rate, highlighting the significant burden that 4K Ultra places on the GPU.

Q: Does the CPU’s high benchmark score translate to a proportional lead in gaming performance?

A: No. While the CPU is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, the Doom frame rates are moderated by the GPU. At 1080p Low, the system hits 263.6 FPS, but this is a game engine result, not a direct reflection of the CPU’s 37780 average benchmark score.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Its 96 MB of shared L3 cache is the standout feature, likely providing a significant advantage in Doom’s data-heavy engine, which benefits from rapid access to frequently used assets. The CPU’s benchmark results support this: it scores 10081 in the 3DMark 16-thread test and 4800 in Cinebench R23 single-core, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

The processor’s performance is closely matched by its nearest rivals in synthetic tests. Its average benchmark score of 37780 is only 0.1% lower than the Intel Xeon 6353P and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225. It also trails the Intel Core i9-13900HK by 0.6% and the Intel Core i5-13600KF by 0.7%. This indicates that while the 9800X3D is exceptionally fast, it is not uniquely ahead of its competition in general compute tasks. However, in Doom, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. At 1080p with Low settings, the system reaches 263.6 FPS, suggesting that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions and can push well beyond typical 144Hz monitors.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process. It has a boost clock of 2544 MHz and a game clock of 2171 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. With 3456 shading units and 96 ROPs, the card is designed for high-throughput rasterization, which is directly relevant to Doom’s fast-paced rendering. Its FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS provides ample compute for the game’s effects and lighting.

The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 30097. This is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which scores 30109 with a 0% delta. The RX 7700 XT also edges out the AMD Radeon RX 570 by 0.2% and the NVIDIA Tesla M60 by 0.4%. In Doom, the GPU’s capabilities are the limiting factor at higher settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 55, which is a substantial decrease from the 4K High result of 68.3 FPS. This indicates that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute capacity are strained by the game’s highest visual fidelity settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 755 out of 1681 tested combinations places it in the 45th percentile of all tested systems. This is a respectable position, but it underscores that while the individual components are strong, the overall system is not at the state-of-the-art of Doom performance. The data shows that the CPU is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. This imbalance suggests that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing, which is confirmed by the FPS scaling across resolutions.

When compared to other combos, this system’s performance is defined by its ability to maintain high frame rates at 1440p. At 2560x1440 with High settings, it achieves 123.8 FPS, which is comfortably above the 100 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. However, at 4K Ultra, the system falls to 55 FPS, which is on the edge of playability for competitive titles. The rank of 755 indicates that many other combinations can achieve higher frame rates, particularly those with more powerful GPUs, but this combo offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU performance for the game’s demands.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system excels, starting at 263.6 FPS on Low and scaling down to 157.2 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset delivers 230.2 FPS, while High achieves 192 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-bound, as even the highest settings do not cause a dramatic drop in performance.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates decrease significantly. Low settings produce 169.8 FPS, Medium yields 148.2 FPS, High drops to 123.8 FPS, and Ultra falls to 100.1 FPS. This scaling shows that the GPU is becoming more of a factor, with a 41% FPS reduction from Low to Ultra. At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. Low settings still deliver 92 FPS, but Medium drops to 79.5 FPS, High to 68.3 FPS, and Ultra to 55 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 40%, indicating that the GPU’s compute and memory resources are saturated.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the optimal choice. It delivers 148.2 FPS, which is well above the 144Hz refresh rate common on modern monitors, while still providing a significant visual upgrade over Low settings. The High preset at 1440p also offers a strong experience at 123.8 FPS, but the 16% performance drop from Medium to High may not be worth the marginal visual gains for competitive play.

For users with 1080p displays, the Ultra preset is viable, as it still achieves 157.2 FPS. This allows for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. At 4K, the High preset is the most balanced, offering 68.3 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for a playable experience. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 55 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced gameplay but is not ideal for fast action. The Low preset at any resolution is not recommended, as the visual degradation is significant and the performance gains are only marginal at higher resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals the limiting component in this system. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all settings is approximately 210.8. This drops to 135.5 at 2560x1440, a 36% reduction, and further to 73.7 at 3840x2160, a further 46% reduction from 1440p. The total reduction from 1080p to 4K is 65%, which is a typical pattern for a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.

The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck at 1080p, as the system achieves over 157 FPS even at Ultra settings. However, as the resolution increases, the GPU’s workload grows exponentially. At 4K, the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth are strained, leading to the sharp FPS drops. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 37 FPS, while at 1080p it is 106.4 FPS. This indicates that the GPU’s performance ceiling is reached much sooner at higher resolutions, confirming that the Radeon RX 7700 XT is the primary limiting factor in this combination when targeting 4K.