Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

The Intel Core i5-10400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination delivers exceptional performance in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, a 2012-released FPS that heavily favors high frame rates. The pairing, ranked 528th out of 1605 tested combos, demonstrates that the RTX 3080's raw power is more than sufficient to push this title to extreme levels, even at 4K resolution. The data indicates a system that is consistently GPU-bound at higher resolutions, while the i5-10400F’s six cores prove ample for the game’s engine demands.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?

A: The combination produces an average of 626.6 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings. This score is significantly higher than the 4K Ultra result, showing how resolution heavily impacts the workload.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in multi-threaded performance?

A: The i5-10400F’s average benchmark score is 14168, placing it 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7552, which has an average score of 14115. It trails the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C by 0.8%, which scores 14277.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to all tested graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3080 sits in the 80th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35787. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Duo, scores 35860, a difference of -0.2%.

Q: What is the best performance result in the measured FPS data?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 856.9 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This demonstrates the massive headroom available when graphical settings are minimized.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low?

A: At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 856.9 FPS at 1920x1080 to 349.1 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a substantial 507.8 FPS reduction, highlighting the immense pixel throughput demand of 4K.

Q: Is the Core i5-10400F a locked or unlocked processor?

A: The multiplier is not unlocked, meaning the processor does not support overclocking. It has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the RTX 3080 is rarely challenged. With Low settings, the average frame rate peaks at 856.9 FPS. Moving to Medium settings reduces this to 727.9 FPS, while High settings yield 626.6 FPS. The most demanding configuration at 1080p, Ultra, still produces an average of 537 FPS, which is a 319.9 FPS drop from the Low preset.

At 2560x1440, the scaling is consistent. Low settings average 588.2 FPS, which is a substantial 268.7 FPS decrease from the 1080p Low result. Medium settings follow at 499.2 FPS, High at 432.2 FPS, and Ultra at 369.6 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 218.6 FPS, indicating a more balanced load on the GPU.

The 3840x2160 results show where the RTX 3080 begins to feel the pressure. Low settings still manage an impressive 349.1 FPS, but the jump to Medium brings the average down to 295.6 FPS. High settings produce 255.5 FPS, and Ultra dips to 217.3 FPS. The difference between the 1080p Low and 4K Ultra results is a massive 639.6 FPS, underscoring the exponential increase in rendering complexity at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, this specific configuration ranks 528th out of 1605 tested combinations. This places the combo in the top third of all systems tested, a strong showing for a mid-range 10th-gen CPU paired with a high-end 30-series GPU. The ranking suggests that while the RTX 3080 is a dominant force, the i5-10400F is not a bottleneck in this title, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. The CPU's 73rd percentile ranking among all processors, with an average score of 14168, supports this analysis; it provides sufficient single-thread performance to feed the GPU in a game like CS:GO. The GPU's own 80th percentile ranking, with an average score of 35787, further confirms the balance of this pairing, as neither component is drastically underperforming relative to its peers.

Resolution Scaling

The data shows a clear pattern of frame rate degradation as resolution increases. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings, the average FPS drops from 626.6 to 432.2, a reduction of 194.4 FPS. Scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 at the same settings results in a further drop to 255.5 FPS, a decrease of 176.7 FPS. This linear progression indicates that the rendering workload is scaling predictably with pixel count.

The implications for the limiting component are clear. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high that even a powerful CPU could struggle to keep up, but the i5-10400F’s 4.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance are sufficient to maintain these numbers. However, the sheer magnitude of the FPS at lower resolutions suggests the CPU is nearing its limit, as the GPU has spare capacity. At 4K, the workload shifts decisively to the GPU, as evidenced by the 217.3 FPS at Ultra settings. The RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are being fully utilized, and the CPU is no longer the primary constraint. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K (349.1 to 217.3 FPS) shows the GPU is the limiting factor, as it is responsible for the increased shading and texture work.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Comet Lake architecture, built on Intel's 14 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache. For a game like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, which is known to be more sensitive to single-core performance than many modern titles, the 3DMark single-thread score of 688 is particularly relevant. This score, alongside the Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1453, indicates that the processor has the per-core strength needed to handle the game's primary game logic and physics threads without becoming a bottleneck.

The processor's multi-threaded capabilities, while not the primary focus for this game, are still robust. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10297 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 4748 demonstrate that the CPU can handle background tasks and any modern game's ancillary threads. The 65W TDP and dual-channel DDR4 memory support are standard for this class of processor. In this specific benchmark, the CPU's role is to deliver frames to the GPU as quickly as possible. At 1080p, the data shows the i5-10400F is able to achieve this, with the 856.9 FPS Low result being near the practical limit for the engine. The 0.4% lead over the AMD EPYC 7552 in average benchmark score is negligible in gaming, but the architectural advantages of the Comet Lake core, specifically its higher clock speeds, are what allow it to perform admirably here.