Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 241 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 87 | 119 | 155 | 190 |
| 1440p QHD | 163 | 208 | 277 | 333 |
| 1080p Full HD | 244 | 314 | 392 | 415 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i5-9400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis
Counter-Strike 2 with an Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 presents a unique study in bottleneck behavior. The data shows a system where the GPU is demonstrably capable of massive frame output, yet the older six-core processor dictates performance ceilings in specific scenarios. This analysis focuses strictly on the measured FPS data and hardware specifications provided.
Resolution Scaling
The measured average FPS across resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between components. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 414.6 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 Low drops this to 333 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Low, it falls to 189.6 FPS. This scaling pattern—where the frame rate drops by roughly 20% from 1080p to 1440p and another 43% from 1440p to 4K—indicates that at Low settings, the CPU is still a significant contributor to the upper frame rate limit, though the GPU begins to take over as pixel count rises.
The High settings preset tells a clearer story about the limiting component. At 1920x1080 High, the system achieves 313.6 FPS. At 2560x1440 High, it produces 208.3 FPS, and at 3840x2160 High, it drops to 118.8 FPS. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is approximately 34%, and from 1440p to 4K it is approximately 43%. This consistent and substantial degradation with resolution is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario. The RTX 3080 is working progressively harder as pixel count increases, and the CPU is no longer the primary constraint.
The Ultra preset reinforces this interpretation. The system delivers 244.3 FPS at 1080p, 162.5 FPS at 1440p, and 87.3 FPS at 4K. The transition from High to Ultra at any given resolution incurs a significant performance cost. For example, at 4K, the drop from High (118.8 FPS) to Ultra (87.3 FPS) is a 26% reduction, highlighting the intense graphical load of the highest settings. The data suggests that while the CPU has enough headroom to push high frame rates at 1080p, the RTX 3080's capabilities are the deciding factor for 4K performance, where even High settings barely exceed 100 FPS.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Core i5-9400 bottleneck the RTX 3080 in Counter-Strike 2 at 1080p?
A: The data suggests a partial bottleneck at lower settings. At 1920x1080 Low, the system hits 414.6 FPS, while at 1920x1080 Medium it achieves 392.2 FPS, a relatively small difference. This indicates that the CPU's six cores and 4.10 GHz boost clock are limiting the frame rate, preventing the GPU from fully stretching its legs.
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for maximum frame rate?
A: According to the measured FPS, the highest average frame rate is 414.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. If visual fidelity is more important, the system still delivers 313.6 FPS at 1920x1080 High, which remains exceptionally high for competitive play.
Q: How does the RTX 3080's memory configuration impact performance?
A: The RTX 3080 features 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This high bandwidth is likely a key factor in maintaining the substantial frame rates seen at 4K, where data throughput demands are significantly higher than at lower resolutions.
Q: Is this system capable of smooth 4K gaming in Counter-Strike 2?
A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160 High, the average FPS is 118.8, which is smooth. At Ultra, the average drops to 87.3 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 26% performance hit compared to High. The GPU's 80th percentile ranking among all GPUs supports its ability to handle this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its direct rivals?
A: The i5-9400 has an average benchmark score of 2305, placing it at the 50th percentile of all CPUs. It is effectively tied with the Intel Core i3-10305, which scores 2300 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core i3-1125G4, which scores 2299 (0.2% faster). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Xeon E-2134 (2295, 0.4% faster) and slightly behind the Intel Core i7-8809G (2319, -0.6% faster).
Q: What do the GPU benchmark scores indicate about its overall performance class?
A: The RTX 3080's average benchmark score is 35787, placing it in the 80th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Duo, scores 35860, which is only 0.2% higher. This indicates the RTX 3080 is a high-end performer, consistent with its ability to push high frame rates in this title.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-9400 is a 6-core, 6-thread processor from the Coffee Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. It lacks hyper-threading, meaning it has 6 logical processors. In a game like Counter-Strike 2, which is known for being sensitive to single-core performance, the 4.10 GHz boost clock is crucial. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the system achieves 414.6 FPS, a figure that is likely constrained by the CPU's ability to feed the GPU draw calls at that speed.
The CPU's benchmark scores provide context for its gaming performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 7969, while its single-core score is 1125. The relatively modest multi-core score, combined with the lack of hyper-threading, means that the CPU can become a bottleneck in scenarios where the game engine uses multiple threads heavily. However, the high frame rates at 1080p indicate that the CPU can keep up with the RTX 3080 at lower graphical loads.
The data shows a clear trend: as resolution increases, the impact of the CPU lessens. The difference between 1080p High (313.6 FPS) and 1440p High (208.3 FPS) is a 105 FPS drop, which is more indicative of GPU load. The CPU's 6 cores and 9 MB of shared L3 cache are sufficient to avoid severe stuttering, but the system's peak performance at low resolutions is capped by the processor's 50th percentile ranking. The i5-9400 is effectively a mid-pack performer, and in this pairing, it is the weaker link for high-refresh-rate 1080p play.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database, this specific combination of the Core i5-9400 and RTX 3080 ranks 573rd out of 1632 tested combos for Counter-Strike 2. This places it in the 65th percentile of all tested systems. This is a solid ranking, but it is not at the top tier. Given that the GPU is in the 80th percentile, the ranking suggests that the CPU is holding the combo back from reaching the upper echelons of performance.
The combo rank of 573 indicates that while the RTX 3080 is powerful, the i5-9400's mid-pack performance prevents the system from achieving the highest frame rates that the GPU could potentially deliver. Systems with newer, faster CPUs would likely rank higher with the same GPU. The data implies that for users aiming to maximize their 1080p frame rates, a faster CPU would be a more impactful upgrade than a faster GPU. The ranking is a holistic measure of the system's ability to play this game, and it reflects the balance (or imbalance) between the two primary components.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the dominant component in this system. It features a GA102 chip on the Ampere architecture with 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. Its high texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s are instrumental in handling the graphical load at higher resolutions. The GPU's FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS provides the raw compute power necessary for the advanced rendering techniques in Counter-Strike 2.
The GPU's memory subsystem is also a key asset. With 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s, the RTX 3080 can quickly access textures and geometry data. This is particularly important at 4K resolution, where the memory demands are high. The measured FPS data shows the GPU's strength: at 4K High, it produces 118.8 FPS, demonstrating that it can handle the resolution without being severely bandwidth-limited. The GPU's 80th percentile ranking (average benchmark score of 35787) confirms its high-end status.
The RTX 3080's role is clearly defined by the resolution scaling data. As the resolution increases, the frame rate drops in a manner consistent with GPU-bound performance. The GPU is the component that ensures the game remains playable at 4K, and it provides the headroom for the system to reach very high frame rates at 1440p and 1080p. The GPU's performance is so strong that it exposes the CPU's limitations at lower resolutions, but it is the reason this combo can achieve an average of 118.8 FPS at 4K High settings. Its launch MSRP was 699 USD.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-9400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-9400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 189.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 154.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 118.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 87.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 333.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 276.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 208.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 162.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 414.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 392.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 313.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 244.3 |
Counter-Strike 2 with ii5-9400 + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with ii5-9400 + RTX 3080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.