Evolve

Measured FPS data is available for Evolve, an FPS released on 2015-02-09, pairing the Intel Core i5-12400F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060. The dataset contains 12 measured rows spanning 3 resolutions and 4 settings, with average FPS from 25 at 3840x2160 Ultra to 143.9 at 1920x1080 Low. The CPU has an average benchmark score of 19221 and sits at the 77th percentile; the GPU has an average benchmark score of 16074 and sits at the 58th percentile. The combined system ranks 1386 out of 1695 tested combos in Evolve. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $174; the GPU has a launch MSRP of 349 USD.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. It runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz, a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, a 65 W TDP, and carries 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The architecture is Alder Lake-S, built on a 10 nm process with a 163 mm² die. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Synthetic benchmarks show a processor with strong scaling from 2 threads to many threads. The 3dmark 2-thread score is 1699, the 4-thread score is 3067, the 8-thread score is 4779, and the 16-thread score is 5895, with a max-threads score of 5912. Cinebench R23 results are 16518 multi-core and 2332 single-core. PassMark multi-thread is 19433 and PassMark single-thread is 3481. The single-thread result in particular lines up with the high average FPS observed at 1920x1080 Low, where the measured row reaches 143.9 FPS, the highest value in the entire dataset.

Against its nearest rivals by average benchmark score, the i5-12400F scores 19221. The Intel Core i7-8700K averages 19210 with a deltaPct of 0.1. The Intel Core i5-1335U averages 19167 with a deltaPct of 0.3. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS averages 19364 with a deltaPct of -0.7. The AMD EPYC 7773X averages 18979 with a deltaPct of 1.3. These are narrow gaps, meaning the CPU's average score sits in a tightly packed cluster of rivals.

Relating this to Evolve: the low-setting rows demonstrate the CPU's ability to sustain high frame rates. At 1920x1080 Low, the average is 143.9 FPS. At 2560x1440 Low, it falls to 98.1 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Low, it is 55.5 FPS. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with the 4.40 GHz boost clock, are the platform characteristics that best explain the high 1920x1080 Low result.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 is a Turing-architecture GPU using the TU106 chip, built on TSMC's 12 nm process. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and a 1750 MHz memory clock rated as 14 Gbps effective. The GPU base clock is 1365 MHz and the boost clock is 1680 MHz. Compute resources include 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores. Peak FP32 throughput is 6.451 TFLOPS, pixel rate is 80.64 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 201.6 GTexel/s. The card draws a 160 W TDP and uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.

In the Evolve measured rows, the GPU is paired with the same CPU across every resolution and setting. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 62.3 FPS, High averages 90.4 FPS, Medium averages 112.3 FPS, and Low averages 143.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, the same settings produce 39.9, 60.6, 73.8, and 98.1 FPS respectively. At 3840x2160, they produce 25, 36.5, 45.6, and 55.5 FPS. The 6 GB frame buffer and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are the memory-side specifications in play; the data shows that the 3840x2160 Ultra row, at 25 FPS, is the lowest result in the dataset.

Against its nearest GPU rivals, the RTX 2060 has an average benchmark score of 16074. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S scores 15996 with a deltaPct of 0.5. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 both score 16351 with a deltaPct of -1.7. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15786 with a deltaPct of 1.8. The measured game rows are labeled Low, Medium, High, and Ultra; no separate ray tracing rows are included in the data.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest measured FPS result for this combo in Evolve?

A: The fastest measured row is 1920x1080 Low, with an average FPS of 143.9.

Q: How does the combo perform at 2560x1440?

A: At 2560x1440, Low averages 98.1 FPS, Medium averages 73.8 FPS, High averages 60.6 FPS, and Ultra averages 39.9 FPS.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank among tested systems?

A: The combo ranks 1386 out of 1695 tested combos in Evolve. The data is marked as measured.

Q: How does the CPU's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i5-12400F averages 19221. The closest listed rival is the Intel Core i7-8700K, which averages 19210 with a deltaPct of 0.1.

Q: What are the 3840x2160 results?

A: At 3840x2160, Low averages 55.5 FPS, Medium averages 45.6 FPS, High averages 36.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 25 FPS.

Q: Which 1920x1080 preset has the highest average FPS?

A: 1920x1080 Low has the highest average at 143.9 FPS, followed by Medium at 112.3 FPS, High at 90.4 FPS, and Ultra at 62.3 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this pairing in Evolve is 1386 out of 1695 tested combos. That places it in the lower portion of the measured field. The individual components are not at the bottom of their own distributions: the CPU sits at the 77th percentile and the GPU at the 58th percentile. The Evolve ranking, however, is based on the full set of 1695 combos, not on component-level percentiles.

The measured FPS data helps explain where the pairing stands. At 1920x1080 Low, it reaches 143.9 FPS, and at 1920x1080 Ultra it still holds 62.3 FPS. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the same system drops to 25 FPS. These results span a wide spread, which is consistent with a mid-ranked combo that can run the game comfortably at lower resolutions but loses ground at the highest measured settings.

The rank field is explicit: rank 1386, ofCombos 1695, and dataIsMeasured true. There are no estimated rows in this set; every FPS value in the table below comes from measured data.

Settings Recommendations

Among the measured rows, 1920x1080 Ultra is the highest preset at that resolution and still produces an average of 62.3 FPS. That average is higher than the 2560x1440 High result of 60.6 FPS, and much higher than the 2560x1440 Ultra result of 39.9 FPS. If the goal is the most demanding preset that does not drop below the 2560x1440 High average, then 1920x1080 Ultra is the measured row to choose.

For users prioritizing frame rate, 1920x1080 Low is the fastest measured row at 143.9 FPS. 1920x1080 Medium offers a middle point at 112.3 FPS, and 1920x1080 High remains above 90.4 FPS. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 1920x1080 Ultra average; the best 3840x2160 result is Low at 55.5 FPS. The data therefore points to 1920x1080 as the resolution where the combo produces its strongest measured results across all four settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All average FPS values below are taken from the measured rows. Minimum and maximum FPS are not reported for any row, so only the average FPS values are available.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|---|---|---|

| 3840x2160 | Low | 55.5 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.6 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 36.5 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 98.1 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 73.8 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 60.6 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 39.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 143.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 112.3 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 90.4 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 62.3 |

The ordering is consistent across every resolution: Low produces the highest average FPS, Medium comes next, High follows, and Ultra produces the lowest average. The 1920x1080 Low row is the peak measured result, while the 3840x2160 Ultra row is the lowest. The dataset covers 3 resolutions and 4 settings, and the pattern is stable throughout.