Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

AVERAGE FPS
153
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 153 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 55 72 96 113
1440p QHD 96 126 168 203
1080p Full HD 150 193 256 308

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 113
3840x2160 Medium 96
3840x2160 High 72
3840x2160 Ultra 55
2560x1440 Low 203
2560x1440 Medium 168
2560x1440 High 126
2560x1440 Ultra 96
1920x1080 Low 308
1920x1080 Medium 256
1920x1080 High 193
1920x1080 Ultra 150

Counter-Strike 2 with Intel Core i5-12400F + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a strong, if not top-tier, experience in Counter-Strike 2, ranking 1277 out of 1632 tested combos. This places it in the upper-middle tier of all hardware configurations, indicating that while it won't top leaderboards, it is far from a weak contender. The data shows a combination that is consistently capable of producing high frame rates, especially at 1080p and 1440p, making it a practical choice for competitive play.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1277 out of 1632 in Counter-Strike 2 suggests a position in the 78th percentile of all tested systems. This is a solid result, showing that the pairing is well-balanced for this specific title, which is known for being more CPU-bound than many other modern shooters. The data indicates that this configuration is not a bottleneck in a way that would cripple performance; instead, it provides a stable foundation for high-refresh-rate gaming. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 19221, which puts it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU's average score of 23021 places it in the 66th percentile of all GPUs. The combination of a strong CPU and a competent GPU yields a final ranking that is greater than the sum of its parts, suggesting good synergy for CS2's specific engine demands.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Alder Lake-S architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This configuration is well-suited for Counter-Strike 2, which typically relies on high single-thread performance for game logic and physics, while also benefiting from multiple cores for background tasks and asset streaming. The CPU's 3DMark scores show a significant jump from 2 threads (1699) to 8 threads (4779), indicating good scaling, but the single-thread score of 909 is the more critical metric for this game. In the Cinebench R23 test, the single-core score of 2332 versus the multi-core score of 16518 reveals that while the processor can handle heavy workloads, its per-core strength is what drives CS2's frame generation. When compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-12400F is virtually neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i7-8700K, showing a negligible deltaPct of 0.1. This means that in terms of raw processing power, it matches a previous-generation high-end chip, which is a strong indicator of its capability to not bottleneck the GPU in this scenario.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580, based on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage), is a crucial component here. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. Memory capacity is not a concern at any of the tested settings. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both set at 2670 MHz, a relatively high frequency that contributes to its compute throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS. The GPU's benchmark scores are competitive, with its Passmark G3D score of 15748 placing it in the 66th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which it trails by a deltaPct of -0.7%, a margin so small it is essentially a tie in real-world performance. This indicates that the Arc B580 is not a weak link; it is a modern mid-range GPU that can handle the graphical demands of CS2 at high resolutions. The data suggests that the GPU's role becomes more pronounced as resolution increases, shifting the bottleneck away from the CPU.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across different settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally fast, starting at 308.3 FPS on Low settings. This drops to 256.1 FPS on Medium, 192.7 FPS on High, and 150.2 FPS on Ultra. These numbers show that even at the highest preset, the system easily exceeds the refresh rates of most high-end monitors. Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong, with 202.9 FPS on Low, 168.2 FPS on Medium, 126.1 FPS on High, and 96.1 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p is noticeable but expected, and the system still provides a playable experience at all settings. At 4K (3840x2160), the performance becomes more demanding, with 113 FPS on Low, 96.2 FPS on Medium, 71.5 FPS on High, and 55.1 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is the only setting where the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS threshold, which is a critical point for analysis.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K highlights the changing bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system produces 308.3 FPS, but this drops to 202.9 FPS at 1440p and 113 FPS at 4K. This represents a 63% drop in FPS from 1080p Low to 4K Low. The scaling is more aggressive at higher settings; moving from 1080p Ultra (150.2 FPS) to 4K Ultra (55.1 FPS) results in a 63% reduction as well. This consistent percentage drop suggests that the workload is scaling uniformly with pixel count, which points to the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is able to feed the GPU enough frames, but as resolution increases, the GPU's rendering workload grows, and its performance ceiling becomes the defining constraint. The data indicates that the i5-12400F is sufficient to avoid being a major bottleneck at 1080p, but the Arc B580 is the component that determines the final FPS numbers at 1440p and 4K.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of 144Hz gaming at 1080p?

A: Yes, the data strongly supports this. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 150.2 on Ultra to 308.3 on Low. Even the most demanding preset, Ultra, produces an average of 150.2 FPS, which is above the 144Hz threshold.

Q: Can this system handle 1440p gaming?

A: Yes, it can handle 1440p well. At 2560x1440, the average FPS is 126.1 on High and 168.2 on Medium. These are playable and smooth frame rates for competitive play, though the Ultra preset at 96.1 FPS is just below the 144Hz mark.

Q: What is the expected performance at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the performance varies significantly by settings. The average FPS is 113 on Low, 96.2 on Medium, 71.5 on High, and 55.1 on Ultra. For a locked 60 FPS experience, the High preset is the maximum that can be used, while Ultra will see dips below 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400F is virtually tied with the Intel Core i7-8700K, with a deltaPct of 0.1. It is also 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i5-1335U and 0.7% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, showing it is a solid mid-range performer.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Intel Arc B580 trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 by a deltaPct of -0.7% in average benchmark scores. This indicates that the two cards are very close in overall performance, with the Arc B580 being a highly competitive alternative.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: The data indicates that 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 are both excellent choices. At 1080p, the system provides extremely high frame rates, while at 1440p, it still offers a great balance of visual fidelity and performance, with the High preset achieving 126.1 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

For players prioritizing maximum competitive advantage and frame rate, the 1080p Low preset is the clear choice, delivering an average of 308.3 FPS. This ensures the lowest possible input latency and the highest refresh rate compatibility. If visual clarity is more important, the 1080p High preset offers a still-excellent 192.7 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any high-refresh-rate monitor. At 1440p, the Medium preset (168.2 FPS) provides a great balance, offering a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining high frame rates. The High preset at 1440p (126.1 FPS) is also a strong option for those with 144Hz displays. For 4K gaming, the data suggests using the Low preset (113 FPS) for a smooth experience, as the Medium preset (96.2 FPS) is playable but requires a high refresh rate VRR display to feel smooth. The Ultra preset at 4K (55.1 FPS) is not recommended for competitive play, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The optimal experience, based on the measured data, is either 1080p High or 1440p Medium, both of which provide a high frame rate and a reasonable level of detail.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + Intel Arc B580 in Counter-Strike 2

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 113.0
3840x2160 Medium 96.2
3840x2160 High 71.5
3840x2160 Ultra 55.1
2560x1440 Low 202.9
2560x1440 Medium 168.2
2560x1440 High 126.1
2560x1440 Ultra 96.1
1920x1080 Low 308.3
1920x1080 Medium 256.1
1920x1080 High 192.7
1920x1080 Ultra 150.2

Counter-Strike 2 with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Counter-Strike 2 with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400F + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.