Counter-Strike 2
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 190 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 68 | 88 | 117 | 141 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 157 | 210 | 253 |
| 1080p Full HD | 184 | 237 | 317 | 382 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike 2 with AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a formidable Counter-Strike 2 experience, with measured frame rates that place it comfortably within the upper echelon of tested system combinations. The data shows this pairing ranks 2003rd out of 3719 total combos in this specific title, a position that reflects a balanced build capable of high refresh rate play at mainstream resolutions. This mid-pack placement in the broader database belies the sheer speed on offer, as the measured results indicate the combination is rarely the limiting factor for competitive play.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 2003 out of 3719 places it in the 54th percentile of all tested system pairings for Counter-Strike 2. This positioning is interesting because it suggests that while the CPU and GPU are individually strong, the overall system is outclassed by many higher-end configurations that dominate the top of the charts. However, a deeper look at the measured FPS reveals that this rank does not tell the whole story. The combination is clearly capable of delivering frame rates that far exceed the refresh rates of most standard monitors, especially at 1080p and 1440p resolutions.
What the rank indicates is that there is a large population of test systems with more powerful GPUs or CPUs that achieve even higher raw frame counts, particularly at 4K. The 4060's position in the GPU hierarchy, sitting at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, explains part of this. Its nearest rivals in the database, such as the AMD Radeon HD 7790 and the AMD Radeon 780M, are within a 0.7% performance delta, showing that the RTX 4060 is at a performance tier where small differences in benchmark scores translate to significant changes in game ranking. The 7700X, by contrast, sits at the 85th percentile for CPUs, a much stronger relative position against its own peers.
This divergence in percentile rankings between the CPU and GPU is a key indicator of the system's character. The processor is a top-tier performer, while the graphics card is a solid mid-range option. Consequently, the combo's overall rank is heavily influenced by the GPU's limitations in the most demanding scenarios. In less demanding titles like Counter-Strike 2, this often results in a CPU-bound situation at lower resolutions, which is precisely what the measured FPS data reveals.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a Zen 4 architecture processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, operating on the AMD Socket AM5 platform. Its base clock of 4.50 GHz can boost up to 5.40 GHz, and the data shows strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance in synthetic benchmarks. For instance, it scores 19,088 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,987 in single-core. This raw computational power is critical for Counter-Strike 2, which is known to be sensitive to CPU performance for maintaining high frame rates.
In the measured FPS data, the CPU's influence is most apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 382 FPS. This massive frame rate, far beyond any display's refresh rate, indicates that the game is heavily CPU-bound at this setting. The processor's strong single-core performance, evidenced by its Passmark single-thread score of 4,190, allows the game's main thread to process game logic and player positions with minimal bottleneck. The 16 threads also provide ample headroom for background tasks and game engine overhead.
The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache is another factor that benefits this game. Counter-Strike 2 relies on quick access to frequently used data, and the large cache helps reduce latency, which can translate into more consistent frame times. The 7700X's 105W TDP and 5 nm process node mean it can sustain high boost clocks without excessive power draw, ensuring that the performance seen in benchmarks is representative of sustained gaming loads. This CPU is clearly not the weak link in this pairing, as its performance ceiling is far above what the GPU can deliver in many scenarios.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. Its boost clock is rated at 2460 MHz. The GPU's 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores are present, though their impact in Counter-Strike 2 is minimal given the game's lack of heavy ray tracing or DLSS reliance. The GPU's overall performance, represented by its Passmark G3D score of 19,545, places it at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, indicating a solid mid-range part that is capable of running most games at high settings.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a crucial consideration for this game at higher resolutions. At 4K, the data shows a significant drop in performance as settings increase. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 68, which is a considerable decrease from the 4K Low average of 141 FPS. This suggests that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor, and the 8 GB frame buffer may be nearing its limit with the higher resolution and more detailed textures, causing performance to scale poorly. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s is also a constraint at 4K, as the game needs to stream more data to the GPU.
The RTX 4060's role is to provide a baseline of performance that is respectable but not spectacular at 4K, while being more than sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The measured 1080p High average of 237 FPS confirms its ability to handle the game at high refresh rates with good visual fidelity. However, the data shows that the GPU's performance ceiling is reached at 4K, where the CPU's power is no longer enough to compensate for the GPU's limitations. This creates a clear divide in the system's behavior: CPU-bound at lower resolutions, GPU-bound at higher ones.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality settings. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. The Low preset achieves an average of 382 FPS, which drops to 317 FPS on Medium with a minimum of 270 FPS and a maximum of 365 FPS. High settings still deliver a blistering 237 FPS average, while Ultra reduces the average to 184 FPS. These numbers show that the combo can easily drive a 240Hz monitor at 1080p with competitive settings, and even at Ultra, it remains above the 144Hz threshold for most players.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong. The Low preset averages 253 FPS, and Medium comes in at 210 FPS with a minimum of 179 FPS. High settings still produce 157 FPS, which is adequate for high refresh rate gaming, but Ultra drops to 122 FPS. This is a notable step down from 1080p, but the system remains highly playable at this resolution. The 1440p Medium and High settings are the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and frame rate, as they both stay above the 144 FPS mark.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits. The Low preset averages 141 FPS, which is still playable. However, Medium drops to 117 FPS, High to 88 FPS, and Ultra to 68 FPS. The minimum FPS is only recorded for the Medium setting at 100 FPS, indicating that frame pacing can become an issue at higher settings. The 4K Ultra result of 68 FPS is the only measured scenario that falls below the 144 FPS mark, demonstrating that this resolution is the boundary for this particular combo when seeking maximum visual fidelity.
Resolution Scaling
The scaling of FPS from 1080p to 4K reveals the system's bottleneck characteristics. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 382 at 1080p to 253 at 1440p, a reduction of 129 FPS, and then to 141 at 4K, another 112 FPS drop. This pattern shows that at Low settings, the CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p, as the GPU has plenty of headroom. The FPS reduction from 1080p to 1440p is steep, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is less severe, suggesting a transition towards GPU limitation.
For the Ultra preset, the scaling is different. The average FPS falls from 184 at 1080p to 122 at 1440p, a 62 FPS drop, and then to 68 at 4K, a 54 FPS drop. The percentage decrease from 1080p to 4K is much larger for Ultra (63% reduction) compared to Low (63% reduction as well, but from a much higher base). This indicates that at Ultra settings, the GPU is the dominant bottleneck at all resolutions, but especially at 4K. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are likely the culprits, as they struggle to feed the GPU with enough data at the highest resolution.
The data implies that the limiting component shifts based on the resolution and settings. At 1080p, the CPU is the main constraint, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. As resolution increases, the load on the GPU grows, and it becomes the limiting factor, particularly at 4K Ultra. This is a classic behavior for a system with a high-end CPU and a mid-range GPU. The 7700X's power is unleashed at lower resolutions, while the 4060's limits are exposed at higher ones.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and refresh rate priorities. For competitive play at 1080p, the Low preset's 382 FPS average is the clear choice for maximizing frame rate, though the Medium preset at 317 FPS offers a good balance with improved visuals. For users with a 240Hz monitor, both Low and Medium at 1080p are excellent options, as they both exceed the refresh rate. The High preset at 237 FPS is also viable for those who want better image quality without sacrificing too much performance.
At 1440p, the Medium preset is the standout recommendation. Its 210 FPS average is well above the 144Hz common refresh rate, and the 179 FPS minimum ensures smooth gameplay. The High preset at 157 FPS is also a strong choice for those with 144Hz displays, but the Medium preset provides more headroom for frame time consistency. The Ultra preset at 122 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced competitive play where high frame rates are paramount.
For 4K gaming, the Low preset's 141 FPS is the only setting that provides a consistently high frame rate. Medium at 117 FPS is acceptable for casual play, but the High and Ultra presets at 88 FPS and 68 FPS respectively are below the threshold for high refresh rate monitors. The data suggests that for the best experience at 4K, users should stick to the Low or Medium presets. For 1080p and 1440p, Medium or High provide the best compromise between visual fidelity and the high frame rates that Counter-Strike 2 players expect.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo capable of 144 FPS at 1440p?
A: Yes. The measured data shows the combo averages 210 FPS at 1440p Medium and 157 FPS at 1440p High. Both settings exceed the 144 FPS target, making it a strong choice for high refresh rate 1440p monitors.
Q: What is the best setting for maximum FPS at 1080p?
A: The Low preset provides the highest average FPS at 1080p, with a measured average of 382 FPS. This is the optimal choice for competitive players seeking the absolute highest frame rate.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?
A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K Low settings, the average FPS is 141, which is playable. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 68 FPS, which is below the high refresh rate threshold. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 35,909, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core 7 250H. It outperforms its closest rivals by a very slim margin.
Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 17,639, placing it near the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which has a score of 17,666.
Q: Is the system CPU-bound or GPU-bound at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, the system is likely CPU-bound. The 382 FPS average on Low settings is far higher than what the GPU's performance percentile would suggest it can achieve, indicating the processor is the primary driver of frame rate at this resolution.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in Counter-Strike 2
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 141.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 117.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 88.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 68.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 253.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 210.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 157.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 122.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 382.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 317.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 237.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 184.0 |
Counter-Strike 2 with Ryzen 7 7700X + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike 2 with RTX 4060 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike 2 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700X + RTX 4060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.