Control

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile delivers a compelling, if not class-leading, experience in Control, a 2019 Action Adventure title. The measured data reveals a system that is clearly capable of high refresh rate play at 1080p, but which begins to show its mobile limitations as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results to understand exactly where the bottlenecks lie and what settings provide the optimal balance of fidelity and performance.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Panther Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, supported by an 18 MB shared L3 cache. While Control is not typically a title that stresses all available cores, this processor's high boost clock is the more critical factor for the game's physics and AI calculations. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is not the primary limitation. The GPU is able to push frame rates up to 140 FPS on Low settings, indicating that the CPU can feed the graphics card with enough data to reach high performance levels.

The processor’s single-core performance is a strong indicator of its gaming capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 3984 points in the single-core test. This is a very strong result, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. For a game like Control, which relies heavily on a single main thread for rendering calls, this level of single-core performance ensures that the CPU does not become a bottleneck in most scenarios. The multi-core score of 28221 in Cinebench R23 is also robust, but its impact on Control is less significant than the single-core score.

When comparing the Ultra X7 368H to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly contested group. It has a deltaPct of -0.1 against the Intel Core 7 253PE and -0.2 against the Intel Core 5 223PE, meaning it is marginally slower in aggregate benchmarks. However, it is 0.2% faster than both the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and the Intel Xeon 6507P. These differences are negligible (fractions of a percent), suggesting that any of these CPUs would provide a similar level of performance in a game like Control, where the GPU typically dominates the workload. The takeaway is that the 368H provides a very capable foundation, ensuring the RTX 4070 Mobile can operate near its full potential without significant CPU-induced frame pacing issues.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the clear workhorse for this gaming experience. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, it provides 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost clock of 1695 MHz. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 4608 shading units and 36 RT cores, which are relevant for Control's use of ray-traced reflections and other effects. The GPU's performance percentile is 73rd, indicating it is a strong mobile part, though not the absolute fastest available.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a key factor, particularly at higher resolutions. The benchmark data shows that at 2160p Ultra, the average FPS drops to 39. While the GPU's compute power is a factor, the 8 GB frame buffer is likely a limiting factor at this resolution and setting combination, as Control can demand significant memory for high-resolution textures and effects. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19587 places it in direct competition with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (deltaPct of 0) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (deltaPct of -0.5). This is a remarkable result, suggesting that in raw compute terms, the mobile 4070 is competitive with a previous-generation desktop flagship.

However, the mobile form factor means the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, which will impact sustained clock speeds and thermal performance. Despite this, the benchmark results show it is more than capable at 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p High, it achieves 88 FPS, and at 1440p High, it still manages a very playable 67 FPS. The data indicates that the RTX 4070 Mobile is a balanced performer, but its VRAM capacity and bandwidth will be the first components to limit performance when pushing to 4K, rather than its raw shader power.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales with resolution. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 140 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the frame rate drops to 106 FPS, a 24.3% decrease. At 2160p Low, the average FPS falls to 71, a further 33.0% drop from 1440p. This scaling pattern is typical for a GPU-bound system. The CPU has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates, but the GPU's rendering load increases exponentially with pixel count, leading to diminishing returns.

The scaling is more pronounced at higher settings. For example, at High settings, the frame rate drops from 88 FPS at 1080p to 67 FPS at 1440p (a 23.9% decrease) and then to 45 FPS at 2160p (a 32.8% decrease from 1440p). This consistent pattern across all settings confirms that the GPU is the primary limiting component as resolution increases. The CPU's impact is minimal; the 16-core processor is not being saturated at any resolution. The significant drop from 1440p to 2160p, particularly at Ultra settings where it falls to 39 FPS, highlights the strain placed on the GPU's memory subsystem and compute units.

The data suggests that the system is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming. At these resolutions, the GPU is the main driver, but it has sufficient headroom to produce high frame rates. At 2160p, the system becomes heavily GPU-limited, and even the powerful RTX 4070 Mobile cannot maintain the high refresh rates seen at lower resolutions. The 8 GB VRAM is likely a contributing factor at this resolution, as the game may be forced to use less efficient memory management or lower-resolution textures, impacting the average FPS.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based strictly on the measured data, the optimal balance of visual quality and performance for this combo is the Medium preset at 1440p. This is the only setting at 1440p that provides both an average FPS above 60 (75 FPS) and a recorded minimum FPS of 64, ensuring a smooth experience without significant stutters. While the High preset at 1440p offers better visuals at 67 FPS, the lack of a measured minimum FPS makes it a riskier choice for maintaining a consistent framerate. Medium at 1440p represents a sweet spot where the visuals are still a significant upgrade over Low, but the performance remains fluid.

For players prioritizing high refresh rates, Low at 1080p is the clear winner, with an average of 140 FPS. This is ideal for competitive play or for those with high-refresh-rate displays. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 41 FPS (from 140 to 99), which is a substantial hit. The Medium preset at 1080p also provides a solid experience with a minimum FPS of 84, making it a good option if you want better visuals than Low without sacrificing too much smoothness.

At 2160p, the system is not ideal. The Low preset at 2160p is the only one that achieves a playable average FPS of 71. However, the visual quality is significantly compromised. The Medium preset at 2160p averages 51 FPS with a minimum of 43 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced moments but will feel sluggish during intense action. The High and Ultra presets at 2160p, with averages of 45 and 39 FPS respectively, are not recommended for a consistent experience. Therefore, the data strongly suggests that 1080p and 1440p are the target resolutions for this hardware, with 1440p Medium being the best overall experience.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile ranks at 2008 out of 3720 tested combos for Control. This places it in the 46th percentile of all tested systems. This ranking is somewhat lower than what the individual component benchmarks might suggest, indicating that there are many other system configurations that perform better in this specific game.

The rank, slightly below the median, is likely influenced by the mobile nature of this hardware. While the RTX 4070 Mobile is a powerful part, it is competing against a wide field that includes desktop GPUs and higher-TDP mobile parts. The 115 W TDP of the GPU is a significant constraint compared to desktop counterparts that can draw significantly more power. This means that sustained performance in a demanding game like Control may be lower than a desktop part with the same chip.

Furthermore, the 8 GB VRAM may be a differentiator. Many combos ranked above this one likely feature GPUs with 12 GB or 16 GB of VRAM, which would allow them to handle 4K Ultra textures more effectively, pulling their average scores higher. The ranking also suggests that while this combo is a capable performer, it is not a top-tier setup. It is a well-rounded mobile solution that offers a good gaming experience at mainstream resolutions, but it is outclassed by more powerful, often bulkier, systems in the database. The data shows a solid mid-table finish, which is a fair reflection of its mobile, power-constrained design.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a high frame rate?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 (1080p) is the best resolution for maximum frame rates. On Low settings, it hits 140 FPS, and even on High settings, it maintains a strong 88 FPS.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Control?*

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 2160p, the system can only manage a playable average FPS of 71 on Low settings. At higher settings like Medium, the average drops to 51 FPS, and at Ultra it falls to 39 FPS, which is below the threshold for a consistently smooth experience.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Mobile's benchmark score compare to a desktop RTX 3090?

A: The RTX 4070 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 19587 is only 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090's average score, per the nearestRivals data, suggesting near-parity in raw compute benchmarks.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p?

A: No. The data indicates the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p. The system achieves 140 FPS on Low settings, which shows the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU effectively.

Q: What is the only setting at 1440p that has a recorded minimum FPS above 60?

A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the only one with a measured minimum FPS of 64. All other 1440p presets in the data set lack a recorded minimum FPS value.

Q: What is the average FPS difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 106 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 58 FPS. This represents a 48 FPS difference between the lowest and highest quality presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table details the exact average FPS measurements for each resolution and settings preset.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :---------- |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 71 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 51 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 45 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 39 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 106 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 75 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 67 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 58 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 140 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 99 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 88 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 77 |

The data shows a clear progression. At 1080p, the system is highly capable, with all presets delivering an average FPS above 77. At 1440p, the experience is still strong, but the Ultra preset drops below 60 FPS. At 2160p, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates, with only the Low preset averaging above 60 FPS.

For the Medium presets, which have recorded minimum and maximum FPS values, we can see the frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the FPS ranges from 84 to 114. At 1440p Medium, it ranges from 64 to 86. At 2160p Medium, the range is from 43 to 58. This data reinforces the recommendation of 1440p Medium, as it is the highest resolution setting where the minimum FPS remains comfortably above 60, ensuring a smooth and consistent gameplay experience. The 1080p Medium preset also offers a solid experience with a minimum of 84 FPS, making it a good alternative for those who prioritize smoothness over resolution.