Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
104
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 104 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 53 61 69 97
1440p QHD 79 91 102 144
1080p Full HD 104 120 135 190

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 97
3840x2160 Medium 69
3840x2160 High 61
3840x2160 Ultra 53
2560x1440 Low 144
2560x1440 Medium 102
2560x1440 High 91
2560x1440 Ultra 79
1920x1080 Low 190
1920x1080 Medium 135
1920x1080 High 120
1920x1080 Ultra 104

Control with Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis

Control is a demanding Action Adventure title that stresses both the CPU and GPU, and the data for the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile shows a system that is clearly GPU-limited at higher resolutions. The benchmark results indicate a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K being the only resolution where the frame rate dips below the 60 FPS threshold on the highest settings. This combination places in the 1024th position out of 3720 tested combos, putting it in the upper third of all systems tested for this game. The following analysis breaks down how this combo behaves across resolutions, settings, and what each component contributes to the final frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep, revealing a system that hits a hard GPU wall as pixel count increases. At 1080p with High settings, the combo averages 120 FPS. Moving to 1440p High drops that to 91 FPS, a 24% reduction. At 4K High, the average falls to 61 FPS, which is a 33% drop from 1440p and a 49% drop from 1080p. This scaling pattern is classic GPU-bound behavior: the CPU has enough headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions, but the RTX 5080 Mobile cannot keep up with the 4K pixel throughput.

The Ultra settings curve tells the same story. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 104 FPS, which is still very playable. At 1440p Ultra, it drops to 79 FPS. At 4K Ultra, it falls to 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target that most gamers consider the baseline for smooth action gameplay. The difference between 1080p Ultra and 4K Ultra is a 49% reduction, identical to the High settings drop. This consistency across settings confirms that resolution is the dominant factor, not the graphical preset.

Looking at the Low settings numbers, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 190 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 1440p Low, it still manages 144 FPS. At 4K Low, it drops to 97 FPS. Even at the lowest settings, the 4K resolution cuts performance nearly in half compared to 1080p Low. This means that if you want to play at 4K, you will need to sacrifice visual quality to maintain high frame rates, but you will still be above 60 FPS at Low settings.

The Medium settings data includes min and max frame rates, which provide additional insight. At 1080p Medium, the average is 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average is 102 FPS with a minimum of 87 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average is 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. The minimum frame rate at 4K Medium is just 1 FPS below 60, indicating that the system can occasionally stutter at that resolution. The variance between min and max is about 30% at each resolution, suggesting consistent frame pacing rather than sporadic spikes.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?

A: The average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings is 120 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold and suitable for smooth gameplay on standard monitors.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming at Ultra settings?

A: No, it cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra. The average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target for smooth action gameplay.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS on High settings?

A: Both 1080p and 1440p maintain 60+ FPS on High settings. At 1080p High, the average is 120 FPS, and at 1440p High, the average is 91 FPS. At 4K High, it drops to 61 FPS, which is just barely above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How much of a performance drop is there between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings?

A: The drop is 49%. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 104 FPS, while at 4K Ultra, it is 53 FPS. This indicates a significant GPU bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Q: Does the game run better at Medium settings than High settings at 4K?

A: Yes, it does. At 4K Medium, the average is 69 FPS, which is 8 FPS higher than the 61 FPS at 4K High. This suggests that reducing settings from High to Medium provides a meaningful frame rate boost at 4K.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The minimum frame rate at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 87 FPS. This is still well above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring a smooth experience even during demanding scenes.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, running at a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It has a 24 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU scores 17984.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1810.5 in single-core. These numbers place it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs tested, indicating strong performance for a mobile processor.

In Control, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The benchmark data shows that at 1080p, the system is not CPU-limited, as the frame rates scale down significantly when resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 190 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate that the CPU could become a factor, but the fact that it maintains this level suggests the 185H has sufficient headroom. The 5.10 GHz boost clock is critical for single-threaded game logic, which Control relies on heavily.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 9 185H has an average benchmark score of 35670, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (35719, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core 7 250H (35728, -0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802, -0.4% delta). It is also within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X (35909). This means that swapping the CPU for any of these rivals would have a negligible impact on frame rates in Control, as the game is not CPU-bound at the resolutions tested.

The 16 cores and 22 threads provide ample parallel processing capability for background tasks and game engine threads. However, Control's engine does not scale perfectly with core count, so the single-core performance is more relevant. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1810.5 is solid for a mobile chip, ensuring that the game's main thread does not become a bottleneck. In practice, the data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor at any resolution or setting, as the frame rate differences between Low and Ultra settings are consistent across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile ranks 1024th out of 3720 tested combos in Control. This places it in the 72nd percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms roughly 72% of other combinations. This is a strong result, but it is not at the top tier, as there are many systems with more powerful desktop GPUs or higher-end mobile parts that achieve better frame rates.

The ranking is driven primarily by the GPU, as the CPU is not a limiting factor. The RTX 5080 Mobile is a high-end mobile GPU, but it is not the absolute fastest, as evidenced by its 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combination of a strong CPU and a high-end GPU results in a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming but struggles at 4K Ultra settings.

Compared to other combos in the database, this system sits above the median, which is expected given the hardware. The 1024th rank out of 3720 means that 2696 other combos perform worse, while 1023 perform better. This suggests that for the majority of games, this combo will deliver playable frame rates at high settings, but for the most demanding titles at 4K, it will require settings adjustments.

The ranking also reflects the GPU's position relative to its rivals. The RTX 5080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38349, which is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (38299, +0.1% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135, +0.6% delta). This means that in terms of raw compute, the 5080 Mobile is comparable to the 4080 Mobile, but the 5080 has newer architecture and better features. The ranking in Control reflects this, as the 1024th position is consistent with a high-end mobile GPU that is not quite at the level of desktop flagships.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is the primary driver of performance in Control, with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, along with 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores. The GPU runs at a base clock of 975 MHz and a boost clock of 1500 MHz, with a TDP of 80 W. This mobile part is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and manufactured on a 5 nm process.

In Control, the GPU's role is critical, as the game is heavily GPU-bound at all tested resolutions. The 16 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for Control at any settings, as the game does not require more than 8 GB even at 4K Ultra. The 896.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that texture streaming is not a bottleneck, which is important for the game's fast-paced environments.

The GPU's benchmark scores show its capability. It scores 4952 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 166986 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 169754 in Geekbench Vulkan. In Passmark, it scores 27711 in G3D and 12134 in GPU Compute. These scores place it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, indicating strong performance. However, its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38135, +0.6% delta), which means the 5080 Mobile is only slightly faster than the previous generation's top mobile chip.

The frame rate data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. At 4K Ultra, the average is 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. Even at 4K High, it only reaches 61 FPS, leaving no headroom for demanding scenes. This indicates that the GPU's raw compute power is insufficient for 4K Ultra in Control, despite its high benchmark scores. At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU has more than enough power, as evidenced by the high frame rates at all settings.

The 80 W TDP is noteworthy for a mobile GPU, as it allows for better thermals and sustained performance in laptops. This is reflected in the consistent frame rates across the Medium settings, where the minimum and maximum frame rates are relatively close. The GPU's clock speeds are modest for a high-end part, but the architecture's efficiency compensates for this, delivering strong performance per watt.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional frame rates across all settings. With Low settings, the average is 190 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming. Medium settings drop to 135 FPS with a minimum of 115 FPS and a maximum of 155 FPS. High settings average 120 FPS, and Ultra settings average 104 FPS. All of these are well above the 60 FPS threshold, making 1080p a non-issue for this combo.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU's limits. Low settings average 144 FPS, which is still excellent. Medium settings average 102 FPS with a minimum of 87 FPS and a maximum of 117 FPS. High settings average 91 FPS, and Ultra settings average 79 FPS. All of these are above 60 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience at 1440p even on the highest settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. Low settings average 97 FPS, which is playable but not as smooth as lower resolutions. Medium settings average 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS, meaning the minimum dips below the 60 FPS threshold. High settings average 61 FPS, which is just barely above 60 FPS. Ultra settings average 53 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target and will result in noticeable stuttering during intense action sequences.

The Medium settings data provides the most complete picture, as it includes min and max frame rates. At 1080p Medium, the range is 115-155 FPS, a 35% variance. At 1440p Medium, the range is 87-117 FPS, a 34% variance. At 4K Medium, the range is 59-79 FPS, a 34% variance. This consistent variance suggests that the frame pacing is stable, with no sudden drops or spikes, which is positive for gameplay smoothness.

In summary, the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers high frame rates at all settings. At 4K, it can handle Low and Medium settings above 60 FPS, but High and Ultra settings will require a reduction in resolution or settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The data clearly shows that this is a GPU-limited system at 4K, while the CPU has ample headroom for this game.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 9 185H

Cores / Threads 16 / 22
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 45W
Socket Intel BGA 2049
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

VRAM 16 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1500 MHz MHz
TDP 80 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 9 185H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 97.0
3840x2160 Medium 69.0
3840x2160 High 61.0
3840x2160 Ultra 53.0
2560x1440 Low 144.0
2560x1440 Medium 102.0
2560x1440 High 91.0
2560x1440 Ultra 79.0
1920x1080 Low 190.0
1920x1080 Medium 135.0
1920x1080 High 120.0
1920x1080 Ultra 104.0

Control with iUltra 9 185H + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RTX 5080 Mobile + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 9 185H + RTX 5080 Mobile

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.