Control

# Control with AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a robust Control experience across all tested resolutions, with the combo ranking 505th out of 1636 tracked configurations. The CPU's 96 MB of shared L3 cache and 8-core/16-thread design provide strong headroom, while the RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth manage the game's demands. At 4K Ultra, the system produces 51.5 fps average, which is playable but below the 60 fps threshold, while dropping to High settings at 1440p yields 89.8 fps, indicating a well-balanced pairing that leans GPU-bound at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores an average benchmark score of 31580, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700F (31543), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31495), and 0.6% ahead of both the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (31407) and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (31402). These deltas are minimal, indicating near-identical overall CPU performance among these four processors.

Q: What is the RTX 3080's standing relative to its closest GPU competitors?

A: The RTX 3080's average benchmark score is 35787, which is 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35860), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon 880M (35646), 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (36101), and 1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (35435). The percentile ranking places it at 80th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the best resolution for maintaining 60+ fps average with this hardware?

A: At 1440p High settings, the system achieves 89.8 fps average, well above 60 fps. At 4K High, the average drops to 58.6 fps, just below the 60 fps threshold. For a consistent 60+ fps experience, 1440p is the highest resolution that comfortably exceeds 60 fps across High and Medium settings.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the system delivers 182.7 fps on Low, 133.8 fps on Medium, 115.2 fps on High, and 101.9 fps on Ultra. The transition from Low to Ultra represents a 44.2% reduction in average frame rate, going from 182.7 fps down to 101.9 fps.

Q: Does the CPU become a bottleneck at lower resolutions?

A: The data suggests the CPU maintains high frame rates even at 1080p Low, where the average reaches 182.7 fps. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D's single-thread score of 4115 in Cinebench R23 and multi-thread score of 29149 indicate sufficient headroom, as the frame rate scales consistently with resolution changes rather than plateauing due to CPU limits.

Q: What is the frame rate impact of enabling Ultra settings over High at 4K?

A: At 4K, moving from High (58.6 fps) to Ultra (51.5 fps) costs 7.1 fps, a 12.1% reduction. This is a smaller relative penalty than the jump from Medium (66.7 fps) to High (58.6 fps), which costs 8.1 fps or 12.1% as well.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is the primary driver of Control's visual performance in this configuration. Its 10 GB GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus delivers 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for the game's texture streaming and particle effects. The GPU's base clock of 1440 MHz boosts to 1710 MHz, and its 8704 shading units handle the game's DirectX 12 workload with support for 12 Ultimate (12_2) features.

The RTX 3080's 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and DLSS, though the measured FPS data reflects standard rasterization settings. The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 465.1 GTexel/s texture rate contribute to the high frame rates observed at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K Ultra, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the 51.5 fps average suggests the 10 GB frame buffer and compute resources are saturated by the game's highest preset.

The GPU's 80th percentile ranking among all GPUs aligns with its position relative to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (0.9% higher average score) and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (1% lower). This mid-to-high-tier positioning means the RTX 3080 handles Control well at mainstream resolutions but requires settings adjustments at 4K to maintain playable frame rates.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear progression of performance degradation as resolution increases. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 115.2 fps at 1080p to 89.8 fps at 1440p (a 22.1% reduction) and further to 58.6 fps at 4K (a 34.7% reduction from 1440p). This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU becomes progressively more constrained at higher resolutions, as the rendering load increases with pixel count.

The Low settings exhibit the steepest relative drop: 182.7 fps at 1080p falls to 141.4 fps at 1440p (22.6% decrease) and then to 93.6 fps at 4K (33.8% decrease). This suggests that even at minimal graphical load, the RTX 3080 faces significant pressure at 4K, while the CPU's capacity is more than sufficient to feed the GPU at lower resolutions.

Ultra settings show a similar trend: 101.9 fps at 1080p, 75.3 fps at 1440p (26.1% decrease), and 51.5 fps at 4K (31.6% decrease). The consistent pattern of roughly 22-26% drops between 1080p and 1440p, followed by 32-35% drops between 1440p and 4K, confirms that the limiting component shifts entirely to the GPU as resolution climbs. The CPU's 3DMark scores (7980 for 16 threads, 959 single-thread) demonstrate ample compute headroom that never becomes a bottleneck in these tests.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate, the High preset at 1440p is the recommended starting point. The system delivers 89.8 fps average at 1440p High, which comfortably exceeds the 60 fps target while maintaining strong visual quality. At 1080p, High settings produce 115.2 fps, leaving substantial headroom for those prioritizing frame rate over resolution.

If maximum visual quality is the goal, 1080p Ultra at 101.9 fps provides an excellent experience, as the frame rate remains above 100 fps. At 1440p Ultra, the 75.3 fps average still clears the 60 fps threshold, making it a viable option for users with high-refresh-rate 1440p displays who prefer Ultra settings.

At 4K, the choices are more constrained. High settings yield 58.6 fps, which is marginally below 60 fps but generally playable. Medium at 4K offers 66.7 fps, providing a smoother experience with moderate visual compromises. Ultra at 4K drops to 51.5 fps, which may be acceptable for slower-paced gameplay but is not ideal for action sequences. Low settings at 4K produce 93.6 fps, but the visual quality reduction is substantial.

For users who prioritize frame rate above all, 1080p Low delivers 182.7 fps, which exceeds the refresh rate of most monitors. The Medium preset at 1080p (133.8 fps) offers a better balance of performance and quality for competitive play.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its highest performance ceiling. Low settings achieve 182.7 fps average, Medium reaches 133.8 fps, High produces 115.2 fps, and Ultra delivers 101.9 fps. The spread between Low and Ultra is 80.8 fps, indicating that the GPU and CPU combination has substantial headroom even at the highest preset.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong but show the GPU's increasing load. Low settings yield 141.4 fps, Medium produces 98.5 fps, High achieves 89.8 fps, and Ultra delivers 75.3 fps. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs between 22.5% (Low) and 30.9% (Ultra) of performance, with higher settings experiencing larger relative penalties.

At 3840x2160, the system's limits become apparent. Low settings still manage 93.6 fps, but Medium drops to 66.7 fps, High falls to 58.6 fps, and Ultra bottoms out at 51.5 fps. The performance gap between 1440p and 4K is more pronounced: Low loses 33.8% of its frame rate, Medium loses 32.3%, High loses 34.7%, and Ultra loses 31.6%. The 4K Ultra result of 51.5 fps is the only measured configuration that falls below the 60 fps threshold, while 4K High at 58.6 fps also sits just under 60 fps.

The data reveals that this hardware pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where every settings preset delivers playable frame rates. The 4K results are viable only with Medium or Low settings, with High and Ultra requiring either a frame rate tolerance below 60 fps or a willingness to compromise on resolution.