Control

Control

AVERAGE FPS
100
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 100 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 50 58 65 96
1440p QHD 78 89 98 139
1080p Full HD 101 114 131 183

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 96
3840x2160 Medium 65
3840x2160 High 58
3840x2160 Ultra 50
2560x1440 Low 139
2560x1440 Medium 98
2560x1440 High 89
2560x1440 Ultra 78
1920x1080 Low 183
1920x1080 Medium 131
1920x1080 High 114
1920x1080 Ultra 101

Control with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination delivers a robust 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, with 4K Ultra remaining the only truly demanding scenario. The data shows a component pairing where the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance and the GPU’s substantial memory bandwidth combine to produce consistently high frame rates across most tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve high refresh rates?

A: At 1920x1080, the combination reaches an average of 182.5 FPS on Low settings and 101.2 FPS on Ultra, making it highly suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. At 2560x1440, the averages range from 139.3 FPS on Low to 77.8 FPS on Ultra, which still supports smooth gameplay on most displays.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700 has an average benchmark score of 40468, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365. It trails the Intel Core i9-13905H by 0.6% and leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T by 1.2%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile among all tested graphics cards?

A: The Radeon RX 9070 sits in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 34780, placing it just 0.2% behind the NVIDIA A2 and 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 in the aggregate comparison.

Q: Does the CPU's multi-threaded performance scale well?

A: Yes, the data indicates strong scaling. The 3DMark score for 16 threads is 8484, which is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 8479, showing that the 8-core, 16-thread design is fully utilized. Single-thread performance is also solid at 1049 in 3DMark.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate in the measured data is 182.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This demonstrates the system’s capability for extremely high frame rates when graphical fidelity is lowered.

Q: How does the frame rate scale from High to Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops from 88.7 FPS on High to 77.8 FPS on Ultra, a decrease of 10.9 FPS. This is a relatively modest performance hit for the jump to maximum settings.

Settings Recommendations

For players prioritizing smoothness and responsiveness, the Low preset at 1920x1080 yields the highest measured average of 182.5 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play or very high refresh rate displays. However, this setting sacrifices visual quality. The Medium preset at 1080p provides a more balanced experience at 131 FPS, retaining a significant frame rate cushion while improving visual fidelity over Low.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the sweet spot for a high-refresh experience, averaging 98 FPS. This is 9.3 FPS higher than the High preset’s 88.7 FPS and 20.2 FPS higher than Ultra’s 77.8 FPS. The data suggests that the jump from Medium to High at this resolution incurs a noticeable performance cost of 9.3 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 10.9 FPS. Given that the Medium preset remains above the 90 FPS threshold, it is the recommended choice for 1440p gaming to ensure a stable and fluid experience.

For 4K gaming, the data shows that High settings are the boundary for playability. The average of 57.5 FPS is just below the 60 FPS target, but the Medium preset at 64.8 FPS provides a safer margin. The Ultra preset falls to 50.4 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced action but is less ideal. Players with 4K displays should choose Medium settings to maintain a consistent frame rate above 60 FPS, while those who can tolerate slight dips can use High.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 9070’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a 644.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. This is a critical asset for Control, a game known for its complex physics and detailed environments. The benchmark results show that the GPU’s performance scales predictably with settings, indicating that it is not bottlenecked by the CPU in most scenarios. The boost clock of 2520 MHz and game clock of 2070 MHz highlight the card’s high-frequency design, which contributes to its strong rasterization performance.

The GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 95.5 FPS on Low to 50.4 FPS on Ultra, a 45.1 FPS difference. This variance is primarily due to the increased pixel shading load and memory pressure, which the RX 9070’s ample 16 GB frame buffer handles without capacity issues. The card’s 3584 shading units and 128 ROPs provide the raw compute power necessary to drive these high-resolution workloads.

In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 25381 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6290 indicate a well-rounded performer. The data suggests that the RX 9070 is the primary driver of frame rates in this combo, as the CPU’s performance is sufficient to feed the GPU across all tested settings and resolutions. The GPU’s 79th percentile ranking versus all GPUs reinforces its position as a high-end component capable of handling demanding titles like Control.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers excellent performance across all settings. The Low preset leads with an average of 182.5 FPS, followed by Medium at 131 FPS, High at 114.2 FPS, and Ultra at 101.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 81.3 FPS drop, indicating that the game’s higher presets have a substantial impact on the GPU load.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 139.3 FPS on Low, 98 FPS on Medium, 88.7 FPS on High, and 77.8 FPS on Ultra. The performance gap between Low and Ultra is 61.5 FPS, which is smaller than at 1080p, suggesting that the system is becoming more GPU-bound. The jump from Medium to High is 9.3 FPS, while High to Ultra is 10.9 FPS, showing a consistent cost for each tier of graphical fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the system’s limits are more apparent. The Low preset maintains an average of 95.5 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium drops to 64.8 FPS, and High falls to 57.5 FPS, just under the 60 FPS mark. Ultra is the most demanding, with an average of 50.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 45.1 FPS, highlighting the significant strain that 4K resolution places on the GPU. The data shows that the combo can handle 4K at Low settings easily, but for higher quality presets, players must accept frame rates below 60 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination holds a rank of 522 out of 1636 tested combos in Control. This places it in the top third of all configurations, indicating a strong overall performance level. The rank reflects the synergy between the two components, where the CPU’s high single-thread score of 4136 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s substantial memory bandwidth contribute to a well-balanced system.

The combo’s position suggests that it outperforms the majority of tested systems, likely due to the GPU’s high 79th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 91st percentile ranking among all processors. The CPU’s nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Core i9-13905H, show very close aggregate scores, but the combination with the RX 9070 yields a competitive result in this specific game. The rank of 522 out of 1636 means that 1114 other combinations are slower, which underscores the effectiveness of this pairing for Control.

The data implies that the bottleneck in this system is more likely the GPU at higher resolutions, given the CPU’s robust multi-threaded performance (29302 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. However, the overall ranking confirms that this is a high-performing combo, capable of delivering smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, with playable frame rates at 4K on lower presets. The combination’s rank serves as proof of its suitability for demanding action-adventure titles.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Control

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 95.5
3840x2160 Medium 64.8
3840x2160 High 57.5
3840x2160 Ultra 50.4
2560x1440 Low 139.3
2560x1440 Medium 98.0
2560x1440 High 88.7
2560x1440 Ultra 77.8
1920x1080 Low 182.5
1920x1080 Medium 131.0
1920x1080 High 114.2
1920x1080 Ultra 101.2

Control with Ryzen 7 7700 + Other GPUs

See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Control with RX 9070 + Other CPUs

See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700 + RX 9070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.