Control
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 99 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 50 | 58 | 66 | 91 |
| 1440p QHD | 77 | 88 | 96 | 140 |
| 1080p Full HD | 102 | 115 | 130 | 180 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Control with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a compelling 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, though 4K Ultra demands compromises. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data for this specific combination, interpreting how the CPU and GPU interact across resolutions and settings.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that is firmly GPU-limited at higher resolutions, but with enough CPU headroom to avoid bottlenecking at lower settings. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 115.2 FPS at 1920x1080 to 87.8 FPS at 2560x1440, a 23.8% reduction. Pushing further to 3840x2160 yields 58.1 FPS, which is a 49.6% decrease from the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario; the rendering load increases exponentially with pixel count, and the RX 9070’s compute resources become the limiting factor.
The picture changes dramatically when examining Low settings. Here, the 1080p result of 179.5 FPS drops to 139.6 FPS at 1440p (a 22.2% decline) and then to 91.2 FPS at 4K (a 49.2% decline from 1080p). The absolute frame rates are much higher, but the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is nearly identical to the High preset. This consistency suggests that even at Low settings, the GPU is still the primary constraint at 4K. The Ryzen 7 3700X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, but the sheer pixel throughput required at 4K overwhelms the graphics card regardless of the graphical fidelity.
Notably, the gap between 1440p and 4K is consistently larger than the gap between 1080p and 1440p. For instance, at Medium settings, the transition from 1440p (96 FPS) to 4K (65.7 FPS) represents a 31.6% loss, while the move from 1080p (130.3 FPS) to 1440p is a 26.3% loss. This non-linear scaling is typical of modern GPUs where memory bandwidth and rasterization throughput become increasingly strained as the resolution approaches 4K. The data indicates that 1440p is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a substantial visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining frame rates well above 60 FPS on most presets.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications explain the observed performance envelope. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, the card provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for Control’s texture-heavy environments at 4K, and the measured data shows no catastrophic frame time spikes that would indicate memory capacity issues. The GPU’s boost clock of 2520 MHz, combined with 3584 shading units, delivers the raw compute power necessary for the game’s physics and particle effects.
The GPU’s 79th percentile ranking among all tested GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34780, places it in the upper mid-range tier. Its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are the NVIDIA A2 (deltaPct of -0.2%) and the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (deltaPct of 0.3%), indicating that the RX 9070 sits in a performance class where small percentage differences separate competitors. However, in Control, the real-world results are more favorable than the synthetic averages might suggest. At 1440p High, the combo achieves 87.8 FPS, which is a strong result for a game known for its demanding real-time ray tracing and destructible environments.
The GPU’s 4 nm process node and RDNA 4.0 architecture allow it to maintain high clock speeds without excessive power draw, though the 220 W TDP is significant. The card’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures no bandwidth bottleneck from the CPU, which supports PCIe Gen 4. This forward-looking interface means the GPU can operate at full capacity even with the older Ryzen 7 3700X. The data shows that the GPU is the clear limiting factor at 4K, as reducing settings from High to Low only yields a 57% performance increase (from 58.1 to 91.2 FPS), whereas dropping resolution from 4K to 1080p at High settings yields a 98% increase (from 58.1 to 115.2 FPS). This indicates that resolution scaling has a more profound impact than settings scaling, underscoring the GPU’s role as the primary bottleneck.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 offers the best balance between visual fidelity and performance for this combo. At 1440p Medium, the system achieves 96 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay while still providing a significant visual upgrade over Low settings. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs 8.2 FPS (from 96 to 87.8), a relatively small penalty for improved textures and effects. However, the leap to Ultra at 1440p brings the frame rate down to 77 FPS, which is still playable but begins to approach the threshold where fast-paced action might feel less responsive.
For 4K gaming, the data suggests that High settings are the practical ceiling. The 4K High result of 58.1 FPS is just below the ideal 60 FPS target, but it is playable with adaptive sync technology. Dropping to Medium at 4K yields 65.7 FPS, which provides a more comfortable margin. The 4K Ultra preset is not recommended, as the 49.7 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS threshold and represents a 14.5% performance loss over High settings for what is often a marginal visual gain. At 1080p, all presets are viable, with even Ultra achieving 101.5 FPS. The data shows that the Medium preset at 1080p (130.3 FPS) provides an excellent high-refresh-rate experience, while Low (179.5 FPS) is best suited for competitive play where frame rate is paramount.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete dataset reveals a consistent hierarchy across all resolutions. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 49.7 FPS (Ultra), 58.1 FPS (High), 65.7 FPS (Medium), and 91.2 FPS (Low). The spread between Ultra and Low at 4K is 41.5 FPS, indicating that settings have a substantial impact on performance at this resolution. The Ultra preset’s 49.7 FPS is the only measured result below 50 FPS, highlighting that the most demanding settings are too heavy for this combo at 4K.
At 2560x1440, the results are 77 FPS (Ultra), 87.8 FPS (High), 96 FPS (Medium), and 139.6 FPS (Low). The gap between Medium and Low is particularly large at 43.6 FPS, suggesting that the Low preset significantly reduces shadow quality and post-processing effects that are taxing on the GPU. The 1440p Ultra result of 77 FPS is respectable, though it is 15.4% slower than the High preset.
At 1920x1080, the performance is uniformly high: 101.5 FPS (Ultra), 115.2 FPS (High), 130.3 FPS (Medium), and 179.5 FPS (Low). The 1080p Low result is the highest measured frame rate in the entire dataset, demonstrating that the Ryzen 7 3700X can push the RX 9070 to its limits at this resolution when graphical load is minimized. The scaling from Medium to Low at 1080p is a 37.8% increase, which is the largest relative jump between consecutive settings at any resolution. This suggests that the Low preset removes certain GPU-intensive features that have a disproportionate impact on frame rate.
How This Combo Ranks
In the global database of tested combinations for Control, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and AMD Radeon RX 9070 ranks 538th out of 1636 combos, placing it in the 67th percentile of all systems tested. This is a solid mid-to-upper tier ranking, reflecting the balanced nature of the components. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 28631, indicates that the Ryzen 7 3700X is still a competitive gaming processor. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12600 (deltaPct of -0.1%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (deltaPct of 0.1%), showing that it trades blows with newer mid-range CPUs.
The GPU’s 79th percentile ranking is slightly lower than the CPU’s, suggesting that the RX 9070 is the weaker link in this pairing relative to other components in the database. However, the combo’s overall rank of 538 out of 1636 is better than the individual component percentiles might imply, because Control benefits from the combination of the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s high bandwidth. The 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 3700X handles the game’s physics and AI calculations without bottlenecking, allowing the RX 9070 to focus on rendering. This synergy results in a system that performs better in Control than its average synthetic scores would suggest, making it a reliable choice for this title at 1080p and 1440p, with acceptable 4K performance on High settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Radeon RX 9070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Control
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 91.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 65.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 58.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 139.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 96.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 87.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 179.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 130.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 115.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 101.5 |
Control with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs
See how Control performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Control with RX 9070 + Other CPUs
See how Control performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + RX 9070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.