Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti combination delivers a strong performance profile in Control, with the data showing that the pairing ranks in the top percentile of tested systems. The measured frame rates indicate that this combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming and can handle 4K with settings adjustments. The following analysis breaks down the benchmark data to explain how the CPU and GPU each contribute to the game’s results.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combo for Control?*

A: The combo ranks 133rd out of 1636 tested combinations, placing it in the top 8.1% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 28246, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-13490F and the AMD Ryzen 5 230, and 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS.

Q: What is the performance difference between the RTX 5070 Ti and its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti’s average benchmark score is 52086, which is statistically identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 with a 0.0% delta, while it is 2.5% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A1000.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the measured average frame rate is 114.2 FPS, which provides a smooth experience for most displays.

*Q: Is the RTX 5070 Ti capable of 4K gaming in Control?*

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 77.2 FPS. Dropping to Medium settings raises this to 84.7 FPS, while Low settings push it to 120.1 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance score?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X scores 3603 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1253 in 3DMark single-thread tests, indicating strong performance for games that rely on fewer threads.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. Its base clock is 3.90 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The processor features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, with 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

In Control, the CPU’s role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The game is known to be demanding on both the CPU and GPU, especially during combat sequences with destructible environments. The 9600X’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3603, helps maintain consistent frame pacing. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 further supports its capability in handling the game’s main thread workload.

Multi-threaded performance is also relevant, as the game can offload some tasks to additional cores. The CPU scores 25525 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 15182 in Geekbench multi-core, suggesting that the 6-core/12-thread configuration is sufficient to avoid bottlenecks. The PassMark multithread score of 30027 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7585 indicate that the processor can manage the game’s background tasks without compromising frame rates. The data shows that at lower resolutions, such as 1080p, the CPU becomes more critical, as the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. However, the 9600X’s performance appears to keep up well, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p Low settings (236.1 FPS).

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 9600X and RTX 5070 Ti achieves a rank of 133 out of 1636 tested combos in Control. This places the system in the 91.9th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of systems. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component is severely limiting the other.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 28246 places it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU’s average score of 52086 places it in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. When combined, these components produce a system that is well above average for this specific game. The rank of 133 is notable because Control has a wide range of system requirements, and achieving a top-150 spot indicates that this combo can handle the game’s most demanding scenarios, such as heavy particle effects and physics-based destruction.

The nearest rival CPUs, such as the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Ryzen 5 230, have nearly identical average scores with deltas of just 0.3%, suggesting that the 9600X is in a highly competitive tier. Similarly, the GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 4080, has a 0.0% delta, indicating that the 5070 Ti is performance-equivalent to the previous generation’s high-end offering. This equivalence helps explain why the combo ranks so well, as it combines a top-tier CPU with a GPU that matches the performance of a previous flagship.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Control shows a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers excellent performance across all settings. With Low settings, the average frame rate is 236.1 FPS. This drops to 165.6 FPS on Medium, 151.0 FPS on High, and 127.6 FPS on Ultra. The 1080p results show that the system is severely GPU-bound at this resolution, as the CPU has ample headroom to push frames.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. Low settings produce an average of 179.7 FPS, which is still above the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. Medium settings yield 129.9 FPS, while High settings drop to 114.2 FPS. Ultra settings at 1440p produce an average of 97.8 FPS, which is still very playable for a fast-paced action game. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1440p shows a reduction of approximately 45.6% in frame rate, indicating that the Ultra preset introduces significant GPU load.

At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits. Low settings produce an average of 120.1 FPS, which is excellent for 4K. Medium settings reduce this to 84.7 FPS, while High settings produce 77.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K produces an average of 67.7 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS threshold but may not satisfy users with high-refresh-rate 4K displays. The 4K results demonstrate that the RTX 5070 Ti’s 16 GB of VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the game’s textures, but the GPU’s compute throughput becomes the limiting factor at the highest settings.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and features the GB203 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process. It has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2452 MHz. It is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 28 Gbps.

In Control, the GPU is the dominant factor in determining frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The game features extensive use of ray tracing and advanced lighting effects, which the RTX 5070 Ti handles through its 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 43.94 TFLOPS provides ample compute power for the game’s physics and particle effects. The texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s ensures that the game’s detailed environments and character models are rendered without texture streaming issues.

The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM capacity is a significant advantage for Control at 4K resolution. The game’s high-resolution textures can consume a large amount of memory, and the 5070 Ti’s capacity prevents stuttering or texture pop-in. The 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures that the GPU can quickly access these textures, contributing to the smooth frame rates seen in the 4K benchmarks. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 32974 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6604 indicate strong raw performance, which is reflected in the game’s measured FPS.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080 displays, the Ultra preset is recommended, as the average frame rate of 127.6 FPS is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the best visual quality. Users with 144Hz or 165Hz displays may prefer the High preset, which offers 151.0 FPS, or the Medium preset at 165.6 FPS, to maximize smoothness.

For 2560x1440 displays, the High preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, with an average of 114.2 FPS. This is suitable for 120Hz displays. Users with 144Hz monitors may consider the Medium preset, which delivers 129.9 FPS, though it reduces some visual effects. The Ultra preset at 97.8 FPS is also viable for 60Hz or 100Hz displays, providing the highest visual quality without dropping below 60 FPS.

For 3840x2160 displays, the High preset is the recommended choice for a smooth experience, with an average of 77.2 FPS. This is sufficient for 60Hz displays and offers a good balance of quality and performance. The Medium preset at 84.7 FPS provides a slight performance boost at the cost of some visual detail. The Ultra preset at 67.7 FPS is playable but may show occasional dips below 60 FPS in intense scenes. The Low preset at 120.1 FPS is recommended for users who prioritize frame rate over visual quality on 4K displays, though this is an unusual preference given the GPU’s capability. Overall, the data suggests that the High preset is the sweet spot for most users, as it consistently delivers frame rates above 75 FPS across all resolutions.