Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Radeon RX 7700 combination delivers a highly playable experience in Control, though the data reveals a distinct performance ceiling that shifts depending on resolution. At 1080p, the system produces strong frame rates, but the scaling pattern indicates the GPU becomes the primary constraint as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data, contextualizes the hardware’s role, and provides actionable settings guidance based solely on the provided benchmark figures.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent decline as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, which is typical for a graphically demanding action-adventure title. At High settings, the average frame rate drops from 93 FPS at 1080p to 71 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 22 FPS. Moving to 4K at High settings yields an average of 48 FPS, which is roughly half the 1080p figure. This steep drop-off suggests that the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the limiting component in this configuration; the CPU’s performance headroom is not the bottleneck at higher resolutions.

The pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the system achieves 148 FPS at 1080p, falls to 112 FPS at 1440p, and then to 76 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1440p to 4K represents a 32% performance loss, which is substantial and points directly to the GPU’s rendering limits under increased pixel count. Similarly, at Ultra settings, the average FPS goes from 81 at 1080p to 61 at 1440p and finally 41 at 4K. The 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS is the lowest measured value in the entire dataset, indicating that the combination cannot maintain a smooth experience at maximum fidelity in 4K.

The medium preset data provides the only min/max FPS figures in the pack, offering additional insight into frame pacing. At 1080p Medium, the average is 105 FPS with a minimum of 89 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS. This tight spread suggests consistent frame delivery without severe stutters. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and maximum of 92 FPS. The 4K Medium result shows an average of 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and maximum of 62 FPS. The delta between minimum and average grows slightly at higher resolutions, implying that the GPU’s workload becomes more variable as pixel count increases.

Overall, the resolution scaling analysis indicates that the RX 7700 is the dominant factor in performance. The CPU’s 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, evidenced by the high frame rates, but the GPU’s architecture and memory bandwidth are taxed progressively harder at 1440p and 4K. Users targeting 4K will need to accept lower settings to stay above 60 FPS, as even Medium settings only produce a 54 FPS average.

How This Combo Ranks

In the benchmark database, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Radeon RX 7700 achieves a combo rank of 1294 out of 2888 tested combinations in Control. This places the system in the 55th percentile of all tested combos, meaning it outperforms more than half of the configurations in the database but is not near the top tier. The rank reflects a balanced mid-range setup that handles the game well at mainstream resolutions but does not compete with high-end enthusiast builds.

The combo’s ranking is influenced by both components. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT, has a percentile of 74 against all CPUs, indicating it is a solid performer in synthetic benchmarks. Its average benchmark score is 20733, placing it just below the Intel Core i5-12490F, which scores 20802 with a delta of -0.3%. The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 7700, has a percentile of 58 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 370X, which scores 15862 with a delta of -0.1%, showing the RX 7700 is essentially on par with that older card in aggregate benchmarks, though the RX 7700 is a far more modern design.

The discrepancy between the CPU’s higher percentile (74) and the GPU’s lower percentile (58) suggests that the graphics card is the weaker link in this pairing. The CPU has more headroom relative to its peers, while the GPU sits closer to the middle of the pack. This aligns with the resolution scaling data, where the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The combo rank of 1294 out of 2888 reflects this imbalance: the system is capable, but the GPU prevents it from achieving a higher standing in the database. For Control specifically, the measured FPS figures show that the system is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results are less competitive.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It features a 16 MB L3 cache and operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance, scoring 17272 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7254 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Its single-thread scores are also respectable, with 2438 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 913 in 3DMark single-thread.

For Control, the CPU’s role is to handle game logic, physics, and draw calls, while the GPU renders the frames. The measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 148 FPS, which is a high enough frame rate that the CPU must be able to process frames quickly. The 6 cores and 12 threads are more than adequate for this task, as Control is not a heavily threaded title compared to modern simulators or strategy games. The CPU’s 65W TDP and 7nm process node also indicate efficient power usage, but that is not directly reflected in the FPS numbers.

The nearest CPU rivals in the database, such as the Intel Core i5-12490F (which scores 20802 with a delta of -0.3%) and the Intel Xeon 6325P (20821 with a delta of -0.4%), perform nearly identically to the 5600GT in aggregate benchmarks. This means the CPU is unlikely to be the differentiating factor in Control when paired with the RX 7700. The data shows that the CPU’s performance is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p, where the GPU is already producing over 80 FPS at Ultra settings. At 4K, the CPU’s workload relative to the GPU decreases, as the GPU takes longer to render each frame, further reducing any potential CPU limitation.

The Ryzen 5 5600GT’s integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 7) are irrelevant in this configuration since a discrete GPU is present, but the CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 interface (16 lanes) is worth noting. The RX 7700 supports PCIe 4.0, which is backward-compatible, but the Gen 3 interface could theoretically limit bandwidth in some scenarios. However, the measured FPS data does not show any unusual bottlenecks at 1080p, suggesting the Gen 3 interface is not a practical limitation for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably across all settings. Low settings yield an average of 148 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings produce 105 FPS, with a minimum of 89 FPS and maximum of 121 FPS, indicating smooth frame pacing. High settings drop to 93 FPS, and Ultra settings still maintain a solid 81 FPS. These results show that the system is well-suited for 1080p gaming, with even Ultra settings remaining above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings achieve 112 FPS, which is still very playable. Medium settings average 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS, ensuring no significant drops below the 60 FPS threshold. High settings produce 71 FPS, which is adequate for most players. Ultra settings, however, fall to 61 FPS, which is just above the 60 FPS target but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The 1440p results indicate that the system is capable of handling the resolution at medium to high settings, but Ultra is borderline.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings average 76 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a 4K experience. Medium settings drop to 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, and High settings fall to 48 FPS. Ultra settings produce a 41 FPS average, which is not smooth for an action game. The 4K results confirm that the RX 7700 is the limiting factor, as the GPU cannot render the higher pixel count fast enough to keep up with the CPU’s capabilities.

The data also reveals a consistent pattern where the difference between Low and Ultra settings is significant. At 1080p, the gap is 67 FPS (148 vs 81), at 1440p it is 51 FPS (112 vs 61), and at 4K it is 35 FPS (76 vs 41). This suggests that the GPU has diminishing returns at higher settings, where the extra workload from textures and effects costs more in frame rate than the visual improvement might justify.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the primary driver of the measured FPS results. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2459 MHz and a game clock of 2041 MHz. Its 40 ray accelerators (RT cores) support ray tracing, though the measured FPS data does not specify whether ray tracing was enabled. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 25.18 TFLOPS, which is substantial for a mid-range card.

The GPU’s percentile of 58 against all GPUs places it in the upper half of the database, but its nearest rivals show it is not a top-tier performer. The AMD Radeon R9 370X has an average score of 15862, just 0.1% higher, indicating the RX 7700 is marginally slower in aggregate benchmarks. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, which is 1.7% higher, showing the RX 7700 is slightly behind that popular card. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, 1% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679, 1.1% lower.

In Control, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is likely sufficient for the game’s textures, even at 4K Ultra, as the game was released in 2019 and does not have extreme VRAM demands. The memory bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s is also robust, helping to maintain frame rates at higher resolutions. However, the 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS suggests that the GPU’s raw compute power is the limiting factor, not memory capacity. The pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s are high, but they are not enough to sustain 60 FPS at 4K with all settings maxed.

The GPU’s TDP is 200W, and it requires a 550W power supply, but these are power specifications, not directly related to the FPS data. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface ensures adequate bandwidth for the GPU, assuming the CPU’s PCIe Gen 3 link does not bottleneck it. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the clear bottleneck at 4K, where the CPU has more than enough headroom, but the GPU cannot render frames fast enough.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and frame rate preference. For 1920x1080, the system can comfortably run Ultra settings with an average of 81 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the best visual fidelity. If a higher frame rate is desired, such as for a 144Hz monitor, Medium settings at 105 FPS or Low settings at 148 FPS offer smoother motion at the cost of visual quality. High settings at 93 FPS provide a good balance, but Ultra is recommended for most players given the ample performance headroom.

For 2560x1440, High settings at 71 FPS are the sweet spot, as they offer good visuals while staying above 60 FPS. Medium settings at 80 FPS are also viable if players prefer a higher frame rate margin, while Ultra at 61 FPS is playable but may dip below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. Low settings at 112 FPS are overkill for most 1440p displays, but they ensure maximum smoothness. The data suggests that High settings at 1440p are the best compromise between visual quality and performance.

For 3840x2160, the system cannot achieve 60 FPS at any settings preset. Low settings at 76 FPS are the only option that remains above 60 FPS, but the visual quality is significantly reduced. Medium settings at 54 FPS are below the target, and High at 48 FPS or Ultra at 41 FPS are not recommended for smooth gameplay. Players with 4K displays should either drop to 1440p or accept Low settings at 4K, as the GPU’s limitations are evident at this resolution.

The Medium preset at 1440p provides the best balance of frame rate and stability, with a minimum FPS of 68 that keeps the experience consistent. At 1080p, Ultra is the top recommendation due to the high average FPS. For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, the Low preset at any resolution offers the highest FPS, but the visual downgrade may be noticeable.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p Ultra settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings is 81 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay.

Q: Can this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K?

A: No. The highest 4K average is 76 FPS at Low settings, but Medium settings drop to 54 FPS, and Ultra falls to 41 FPS, all below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-12490F’s score of 20802.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all tested GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has a percentile of 58, meaning it outperforms 58% of all GPUs in the database.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming based on the data?

A: High settings at 1440p produce 71 FPS average, which is above 60 FPS, while Medium settings yield 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS for added stability. High is recommended for visual quality, but Medium offers a safer frame rate margin.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, as the CPU’s performance is sufficient, but the RX 7700’s frame rates drop significantly at 3840x2160, with Ultra settings averaging only 41 FPS.