Control

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT pairing delivers a strong 1080p and 1440p experience in Control, with the GPU often being the primary driver of frame rates. The data shows a clear scaling pattern from Low to Ultra settings, with the most demanding presets still maintaining playable averages. This combination sits in the upper portion of the database, outperforming a majority of tested configurations while remaining accessible in terms of system balance.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The measured average frame rate is 110.1 FPS, which provides a smooth experience for a fast-paced action adventure title.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 5500 scores 16,429 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core. This places it within 0.2% of the Intel Core i5-12500 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE, while being 0.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7J13.

Q: What is the maximum memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 7800 XT features a 256-bit memory bus with GDDR6 memory, delivering a total bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5500 a 6-core processor?

A: Yes, it has 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz.

Q: What is the best average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 176.1, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This indicates the combo can easily push well beyond standard refresh rates when graphical demands are reduced.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations in Control?*

A: It ranks 584th out of 1,636 total tested combos, placing it in the upper 35% of all entries in the database for this specific game.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is a substantial component in this pairing, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a wide data path, yielding 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is particularly relevant for Control, a game known for its dense visual effects and high-resolution textures, allowing the GPU to maintain consistent frame pacing without choking on asset streaming.

The GPU's clock behavior shows a base speed of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2430 MHz, with a game clock of 2124 MHz. These clocks, combined with 3840 shading units and 60 ray tracing cores, allow the card to handle the game's physics-heavy environments. In practical terms, the data reveals a clear scaling pattern: at 3840x2160, dropping from High to Low settings increases the average FPS from 56.8 to 87.7, a jump of 30.9 FPS. This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is the limiting factor, and reducing visual fidelity directly translates to higher frame rates.

At lower resolutions, the GPU's headroom becomes more apparent. The pixel rate of 233.3 GPixel/s and texture rate of 583.2 GTexel/s are high enough to keep up with the CPU's output at 1080p. The benchmark results show a 78.1 FPS difference between Low (176.1 FPS) and Ultra (98 FPS) at 1920x1080, indicating that even at the highest settings, the GPU is not fully saturated. The card's FP32 performance of 37.32 TFLOPS is a theoretical peak, but the measured frame rates confirm that it comfortably drives Control at mainstream resolutions without needing to rely on upscaling techniques.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 serves as the central processor, offering 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.20 GHz provide adequate single-thread performance for gaming workloads, as reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,319. The processor's 16 MB of L3 cache is a moderate amount for a modern CPU, but it is sufficient for Control's level streaming and AI routines.

The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities are shown in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,429, which places it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This score is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12500, which posts an average score of 20,897 with a delta of -0.1%. In gaming, this means the CPU will rarely become a bottleneck at lower resolutions, but the data suggests it can influence results when the GPU is less stressed.

At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 176.1 FPS, which is a 47 FPS improvement over the High preset. This gap indicates that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough frames to reach high refresh rates, but the GPU's workload becomes lighter, allowing the processor's single-thread performance to matter more. The Ryzen 5 5500's 3dmark single-thread score of 836 supports this, as it shows solid per-core efficiency for a 5000-series chip. However, at 4K Ultra, the CPU's role diminishes, as the GPU's rendering demands dominate the frame time budget.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, providing a comprehensive view of the combo's behavior. At 1920x1080, the results are consistently high: Low settings produce 176.1 FPS, Medium yields 122.8 FPS, High reaches 110.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 98 FPS. The transition from High to Ultra at this resolution costs 12.1 FPS, showing that the Ultra preset introduces additional effects that impact performance without a proportional visual gain.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages remain playable but show a noticeable step down. Low settings deliver 129.4 FPS, Medium achieves 92.4 FPS, High comes in at 85 FPS, and Ultra falls to 71.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium at this resolution is 37 FPS, which is larger than the 53.3 FPS difference seen at 1080p, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth starts to matter more at higher pixel counts.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain high refresh rates but stays above playable thresholds. Low settings yield 87.7 FPS, Medium drops to 63.6 FPS, High reaches 56.8 FPS, and Ultra falls to 47.6 FPS. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU's raw compute power is the limiting factor, as the CPU's influence fades. The difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 40.1 FPS, which is the largest relative drop across all resolutions, confirming that Control's Ultra preset is demanding on the GPU's fill rate.

How This Combo Ranks

In the global database for Control, this specific combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT ranks 584th out of 1,636 total tested combos. This places it in the top 35.7% of all configurations, indicating that it outperforms a majority of systems tested for this game. The rank is a composite measure, likely weighted by average FPS across multiple scenarios, and the data shows this combo is well-suited for the game's requirements.

The GPU's individual performance contributes significantly to this ranking. The Radeon RX 7800 XT holds the 76th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32,619. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro S9300 X2, scores 32,540 with a delta of 0.2%, showing that the RX 7800 XT is just slightly ahead. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking also supports the overall position, as the Ryzen 5 5500's average benchmark score of 20,875 is within 0.1% of the Intel Core i5-12500.

When compared to the entire field, the combo's rank of 584 suggests it is a balanced pairing that does not have a severe bottleneck. The GPU's high memory capacity and bandwidth allow it to handle Control's heavy texture loads, while the CPU's solid multi-threaded performance prevents frame drops in complex scenes. This synergy is reflected in the measured FPS, which shows consistent performance across all tested settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the High preset at 110.1 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, as it stays well above 60 FPS while providing enhanced effects compared to Medium. The Ultra preset at 98 FPS is also viable for those prioritizing visuals, but the 12.1 FPS penalty over High is notable.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 92.4 FPS is the recommended choice for a smooth experience, as it maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The High preset at 85 FPS is still playable, but the drop to 71.5 FPS on Ultra may cause noticeable stutter on high-refresh-rate monitors. For 3840x2160, the Low preset at 87.7 FPS is the only setting that provides a consistently fluid experience, as Medium at 63.6 FPS and High at 56.8 FPS fall below the ideal threshold for fast-paced action.

For users with variable refresh rate displays, the Low preset at any resolution offers the highest headroom, with 176.1 FPS at 1080p and 129.4 FPS at 1440p. The data suggests that this combo is best utilized at 1080p or 1440p, where it can achieve high frame rates across multiple presets, while 4K requires a sacrifice in visual fidelity to maintain playability.